Effects of Food Texture and Sample Thickness on Mandibular Movement and Hardness Assessment during Biting in Man

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the relationship among jaw movements, physical characteristics of food, and sensory perception of hardness in man. Vertical movements of the mandible were recorded with an infrared tracking device in humans during biting on two test foods, carrot and cheese. Samples of standard length (2 cm) and width (2 cm) were prepared in three different thicknesses (0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 cm). Nine subjects were asked to perform two types of bite with their incisor teeth. In the first, they cut through the food, then stopped and spat out the pieces (bite alone); in the second, biting was followed by mastication and swallowing (bite+chew). The 12 conditions (thickness x3, food x2, and bite x2) were presented in a random order within each block, and blocks were repeated five times (60 trials per subject). Subjects also estimated the hardness of the samples twice for each condition on visual analogue scales (VAS) 100 mm long. The duration, vertical amplitude, and maximum vertical velocity of the mandible during biting were calculated by computer for the three phases of the movements (opening, and fast and slow closing). Multilevel statistical models were used for data analysis. The estimated hardness scores associated with the first bite of thin carrot (59.0 VAS units) was significantly greater than for cheese (16.8 VAS units). The type of bite had no significant effect on these scores, but the estimate of hardness was significantly greater for the thickest sample (+13.3 VAS units). Food type had its strongest effect on the slow-closing phase. In particular, the peak velocity that followed the fracturing of the food sample was much greater for carrot than for cheese (thin, 34.1 mm.s^-1 vs. 26.6 mm.s^-1), and the difference between foods increased with thickness. The amplitude of opening was significantly greater for the thickest sample than for the other two. There were no significant relationships between VAS scores and the movement parameters. These results suggest that, when humans bite food: (1) changing the thickness of food has a greater effect on movement parameters than changing from soft to hard food, (2) the parameters of biting change little if biting is followed by mastication, (3) hardness perception is dependent on the thickness of food, (4) hardness perception is not different when food is removed from the mouth than when it is chewed and swallowed, and (5) there is no relationship between any of the parameters of movement that change with food type and the perceived hardness of food.

Keywords

mandibular movements biting food texture hardness assessment.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amerine MA , Pangborn RM , Roessler EB (1965). Principles of sensory evaluation of food. New York and London: Academic Press, pp. 1-602.

Boyd JV , Sherman P. (1975). A study of force-compression conditions associated with hardness evaluation in several foods. J Texture Stud 6:507-522.

Brandt MA , Skinner EZ , Coleman JA (1963). Texture profile method. J Food Sci 28:404-409.

Cardello AV , Segars RA (1989). Effects of sample size and prior mastication on texture judgments. J Sensory Stud 4:1-18.

Christensen CM (1984). Food texture perception. Adv Food Res 29:159-199.

De Grandmont P. , Feine JS , Tache R. , Boudrias P. , Donohue WB , Tanguay R. , et al. (1994). Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular protheses: psychometric evaluation. J Dent Res 73:1096-1104.

Diaz-Tay J. , Jayasinghe N. , Lucas PW , McCallum JC , Jones JT (1991). Association between surface electromyography of human jaw-closing muscle and quantified food breakdown. Arch Oral Biol 36:893-898.

Feine JS , Maskawi K. , De Grandmont P. , Donohue WB , Tanguay R. , Lund JP ( 1994). Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses: evaluation of masticatory function. J Dent Res 73:1646-1656.

Goldstein H. (1986). Multilevel mixed linear model analysis using iterative generalized least squares. Biometrika 73:43-56.

10.

Goldstein H. (1987). Multilevel model in educational and social research . London: Griffins.

11.

Horio T. , Kawamura Y. (1989). Effect of texture of food on chewing patterns in the human subject. J Oral Rehabil 16:177-183.

12.

Lucas PW , Ow RK , Ritchie GM , Chew CL , Keng SB ( 1986). Relationship between jaw movement and food breakdown in human mastication. J Dent Res 65:400-404.

13.

Mongini F. , Tempia-Valenta G. , Benvegnu G. (1986). Computer-based assessment of habitual mastication . J Prosthet Dent 55:638-649.

14.

Morimoto T. , Inoue T. , Nakamura T. , Kawamura Y. (1984). Frequency-dependent modulation of rhythmic human jaw movements. J Dent Res 63:1310-1314.

15.

Ostry DJ , Flanagan JR (1989). Human jaw movement in mastication and speech. Arch Oral Biol 9:685-693. Ottenhoff FA , van der Bilt A. , van der Glas HW , Bosman F. (1993). Control of human jaw elevator muscle activity during simulated chewing with varying bolus size. Exp Brain Res 96:501-512.

16.

Peyron MA , Mioche L. , Culioli J. (1994). Bite force and sample deformation during hardness assessment of viscoelastic models of foods. J Texture Stud 25:59-76.

17.

Peyron MA , Mioche L. , Renon P. (1996). Effects of various food textures on human mandibular movement. Food Quality and Preference 7:229-237.

18.

Plesh 0 , Bishop B. , McCall WD Jr (1986). Effect of gum hardness on chewing pattern. Exp Neurol 92:502-512.

19.

Plesh 0 , Bishop B. , McCall WD Jr (1987). Mandibular movements and jaw muscles' activity while voluntarily chewing at different rates. Exp Neurol 98:285-300.

20.

Plesh 0 , Bishop B. , McCall WD Jr (1988). Comparison of automatic and voluntary chewing patterns and performance. Exp Neurol 99:326-341.

21.

Plesh 0 , Bishop B. , McCall WD Jr (1993). Kinematics of jaw movements during chewing at different frequencies. Biomechanics 26:243-250.

22.

Schwartz G. , Enomoto S. , Valiquette C. , Lund JP ( 1989). Mastication in the rabbit: a description of movement and muscle activity. J Neurophysiol 62:273-287.

23.

Sherman P. (1988). Rheological evaluation of the textural properties of foods. Rheolog Acta 26(Suppl):44-53.

24.

Steiner JE , Michman J. , Litman A. (1974). Time sequence of the activity of the temporal and masseter muscles in healthy young human adults during habitual chewing of different test foods. Arch Oral Biol 19:29-34.

25.

Stohler CS (1986). A comparative electromyographic and kinesiographic study of deliberate and habitual mastication in man. Arch Oral Biol 31:669-678.

26.

Strenio J. , Weisberg HI , Bryk AS ( 1983). Empirical Bayes estimation of individual growth curve parameters and their relationship to covariates. Biometrics 39:71-86.

27.

Szczesniak AS (1963). Classification of textural properties. J Food Sci 28:385-389.

28.

Szczesniak AS (1987). Correlating sensory with instrumental texture measurements-an overview of recent developments. J Texture Stud 18:1-15.

29.

Thexton AJ , Hiiemae KM , Crompton AW (1980). Food consistency and bite size as regulators of jaw movement during feeding in the cat. J Neurophysiol 44:456-474.

30.

Touraille C. (1988). Evaluation sensorielle descriptive: relation entre approche sensorielle et instrumentale. L'alimentation et la vie: Analyse sensorielle, recents développements et perspectives d'avenir 74:21-28.

31.

Vickers ZM , Christensen CM (1980). Relationships between sensory crispness and other sensory and instrumental parameters. J Texture Stud 11:291-307.

32.

Wang JS , Stohler CS (1991). Predicting foodstuff from jaw dynamics during masticatory crushing in man. Arch Oral Biol 3:239-244.