Stereologic studies of trabecular architecture suggest that the pig mandibular condyle is strongest when loaded supero-inferiorly, and that stress is concentrated in the antero-inferior region (Teng and Herring, 1995). To test these hypotheses, we investigated the uni-axial mechanical properties of 22 pig mandibular condyles in three loading directions at a mean strain rate of 0.14 (± 0.12)% s-1. A total of 91 rectangular beam specimens (averaging 9.0 mm x 6.0 mm x 5.0 mm) was tested. For each specimen, 5 or 6 nondestructive tests were performed before compressive failure. Strain in both longitudinal and transverse directions was measured by foil strain gauges on the central part of the specimen. Data were normalized at a strain rate of 0.1% s-1, specimen length of 9 mm, and cross-sectional area of 30.25 mm2. Generally, modulus of elasticity (E) and ultimate stress (σu) in the anterior regions of the condyle were greater than those in the posterior. E, σu, and Poisson's ratio (υ) were significantly different among the test directions, but ultimate strain (εu) was not. The highest values of E (4.04 GPa), σu (14.97 MPa), and p (0.81 g/cm3) were seen in the anterior inferior/middle region under supero-inferior loading. The lowest values (0.94 GPa for E, 2.38 MPa for σu, and 0.52 g/cm3 for p) were found in the inferior/posterior region in medio-lateral loading. Although the mechanical properties of the condyle vary depending upon location, these results verify that the condyle is strongest and stiffest under compressive loads in the supero-inferior direction, and that the anterior-inferior region is particularly strong and stiff.
Alexandridis C., Caputo AA, Eliades GC (1991). Functional stress modification after high condylectomy surgery. J Oral Rehabil18:317-326.
2.
Allard RN, Ashman RB (1991). A comparison between cancellous bone compressive moduli determined from surface strain and total specimen deflection. Trans Orthop Res Soc16:151.
3.
Ashman RB, Corin JD, Turner CH (1987). Elastic properties of cancellous bone: measurement by an ultrasonic technique. J Biomechan20:979-986.
4.
Ashman RB, Rho JY, Turner CH (1989). Anatomical variation of orthotropic elastic moduli of the proximal human tibia. J Biomechan22:895-900.
5.
Behrens JC, Walker PS, Shoji H. (1974). Variations in strength and structure of cancellous bone at the knee. J Biomechan7:201-207.
6.
Bertram Jea, Swartz SM (1991). The 'law of bone transformation': a case of crying Wolff? Biol Rev66:245-273.
7.
Boyd RL, Gibbs CH, Mahan PE, Richmond AF, Laskin JL (1990). Temporomandibular joint forces measured at the condyle of Macaca arctoides. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop97:472-479.
8.
Brown TD, Ferguson AB Jr (1978). The development of a computational stress analysis of the femoral head-mapping tensile, compressive and shear stress for the varus and valgus positions. J Bone Joint Surg60(A):619-629.
9.
Brown TD, Ferguson AB Jr (1980). Mechanical property distributions in the cancellous bone of the human proximal femur. Acta Orthop Scand51:429-437.
10.
Carter DR, Hayes WC (1977). The compressive behaviour of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg59(A):954-962.
11.
Caputo AA, Standlee JP (1987). Biomechanics in clinical dentistry. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publ. Co., pp. 37-49.
12.
Ciarelli MJ, Goldstein SA, Kuhn JL, Cody DD, Brown MB (1991). Evaluation of orthogonal mechanical properties and density of human trabecular bone from the major metaphyseal regions with materials testing and computed tomography. J Orthop Res9:674-682.
13.
Cowin SC (1986). Wolff's law of trabecular architecture at remodeling equilibrium. J Biomechan Eng108:83-88.
14.
Dalstra M., Huiskes R., Odgaard A., van Erning L. (1993). Mechanical and textural properties of pelvic trabecular bone. J Biomechan26:523-535.
15.
DuBrul EL (1988). Sicher and DuBrul's oral anatomy. 8th ed. St. Louis, MO: Ishiyaku EuroAmerica, Inc., pp. 107-132.
16.
Ducheyne P., Heymans L., Martens M., Aernoudt E., de Meester P., Mulier JC (1977). The mechanical behavior of intracondylar cancellous bone of the femur at different loading rates. J Biomechan10:747-762.
17.
Evans FG (1969). The mechanical properties of bone. Artif Limbs13:37-48.
18.
Fiala P., Hert J. ( 1993). Principal types of functional architecture of cancellous bone in man. Func Dev Morphol3:91-99.
19.
Ferrario VF, Sforza C. (1994). Biomechanical model of the human mandible in unilateral clench: Distribution of temporomandibular joint reaction forces between working and balancing sides. J Prosthet Dent72:169-176.
20.
Fontenot MG (1995). Temporomandibular joint devices: past, present, and future. In: Temporomandibular disorders and related pain conditions. Sessle BJ, Bryant PS, Dionne RA, editors. Seattle, WA: IASP Press, pp. 309-322.
21.
Galante J., Rostoker W., Ray RD (1970). Physical properties of trabecular bone. Calcif Tissue Res5:236-246.
22.
Goldstein SA (1987). The mechanical properties of trabecular bone: dependence on anatomic location and function. J Biomechan20:1055-1061.
23.
Goldstein SA (1992). Clinical applications of bone remodeling dynamics . In: 18th symposium on craniofacial growth-bone biodynamics in orthodontics and orthopaedic treatment. Carlson DS, Goldstein SA , editors. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, pp. 51-73.
24.
Goulet RW, Goldstein SA, Ciarelli MJ, Kuhn JL, Brown MB, Feldkamp LA (1994). The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. J Biomechan27:375-389.
25.
Harrigan TP, Mann RW ( 1984). Characterization of microstructural anisotropy in orthotropic materials using a second rank tensor. J Mater Sci19:761-767.
26.
Herring SW, Mucci RJ (1991). in vivo strain in cranial sutures: the zygomatic arch. J Morphol207:225-239.
27.
Hofmann AA, Hammon DJ, Daniels AU (1991). Compressive strength mapping of femoral head trabecular bone. J Rehabil Res Dev28:25-32.
28.
Hylander WL (1979). Experimental analysis of temporomandibular joint reaction force in macaques. Am J Phys Anthropol51:433-456.
29.
Hylander WL, Bays R. ( 1979). An in vivo strain-gauge analysis of squamosal-dentary joint reaction force during mastication and incisal biting in Macaca mulatta and Macaca fascicularis. Arch Oral Biol24:689-697.
30.
Jensen NC, Madsen LP, Linde F. (1991). Topographical distribution of trabecular bone strength in the human os calcanei. J Biomechan24:49-55.
31.
Keaveny TM, Borchers RE, Gibson LJ, Hayes WC (1993a). Theoretical analysis of the experimental artifact in trabecular bone compressive modulus. J Biomechan26:599-607.
32.
Keaveny TM, Borchers RE, Gibson LJ, Hayes WC (1993b). Trabecular bone modulus and strength can depend on specimen geometry. J Biomechan26:991-1000.
33.
Keaveny TM, Wachtel EF, Ford CM, Hayes WC (1994). Differences between the tensile and compressive strengths of bovine tibial trabecular bone depend on modulus. J Biomechan27:1137-1146.
34.
Korioth TW, Hannam AG (1990). Effect of bilateral asymmetric tooth clenching on load distribution at the mandibular condyles. J Prosthet Dent64:62-73.
35.
Korioth TW, Hannam AG (1994). Mandibular forces during simulated tooth clenching . J Orofac Pain8:178-189.
36.
Kuhn JL, Goldstein SA, Choi K., London M., Feldkamp LA, Matthews LS (1989). Comparison of the trabecular and cortical tissue moduli from human iliac crests. J Orthop Res7:876-884.
37.
Kuhn JL, Goulet RW, Pappas M., Goldstein SA (1990). Morphometric and anisotropic symmetries of the canine distal femur. J Orthop Res8:776-780.
38.
Lemons JE (1995). Biomaterials and biomechanics of synthetic materials for tissue replacement protheses. In: Temporomandibular disorders and related pain conditions. Sessle BJ , Bryant PS, Dionne RA, editors. Seattle, WA: IASP Press, pp. 293-308.
39.
Linde F. (1994). Elastic and viscoelastic properties of trabecular bone by a compression testing approach. Danish Med Bull41:119-138.
40.
Linde F., Nørgaard P., Hvid I., Odgaard A., Søballe K. (1991). Mechanical properties of trabecular bone. Dependency on strain rate. J Biomechan24:803-809.
41.
Linde F., Hvid I., Madsen F. (1992). The effect of specimen geometry on the mechanical behaviour of trabecular bone specimens. J Biomechan25:359-368.
42.
Mongini F. (1984). The stomatognathic system. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publ. Co., Inc., pp. 45-54.
43.
Oberg T., Carlsson GE, Fajers CM (1971). The temporomandibular joint: a morphologic study on a human autopsy material. Acta Odontol Scand29:349-383.
44.
Odgaard A., Linde F. (1991). The underestimation of Young's modulus in compression testing of cancellous bone
45.
specimens. J Biomechan24:691-698.
46.
Odgaard A., Hvid I., Linde F. (1989). Compressive axial strain distributions in cancellous specimens. J Biomechan22:829-835.
47.
Osborn JW, Baragar FA (1992). Predicted and observed shapes of human mandibular condyles. J Biomechan25:967-974.
48.
Rice JC, Cowin SC, Bowman JA (1988). On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. J Biomechan21:155-168.
49.
Røhl L., Larsen E., Linde F., Odgaard A., Jørgensen J. (1991). Tensile and compressive properties of cancellous bone. J Biomechan24:1143-1149.
50.
Singh I. (1978). The architecture of cancellous bone. J Anat127:305-310.
51.
Smith DM, McLachlan KR, McCall WD Jr (1986). A numerical model of temporomandibular joint loading . J Dent Res65:1046-1052.
52.
Snyder BD, Hayes WC (1990). Multiaxial structure-property relations in trabecular bone. In: Biomechanics of diarthrodial joints. Vol. II. Mow VC, Ratcliffe A, Woo S L-Y, editors. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 31-59.
53.
Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Ralph JP (1981). The condyle as a stress-distributing component of the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Rehabil8:391-400.
54.
Takamura H., Maruyama T. (1980). Studies on the structural changes of the temporomandibular joint-Macroscopic observations. J Jpn Prosthod Soc28:49-58.
55.
Tanaka E., Tanne K., Sakuda M. (1994). A three-dimensional finite element model of the mandible including the TMJ and its application to stress analysis in the TMJ during clenching. Med Eng Phys16:316-322.
56.
Teng S., Herring SW (1995). A stereological study of trabecular architecture in the mandibular condyle of the pig. Arch Oral Biol40:299-310.
57.
Throckmorton GS, Dechow PC (1994). In vitro strain measurements in the condylar process of the human mandible. Arch Oral Biol39:853-867.
58.
Townsend PR, Raux P., Rose RM, Miegel RE, Radin EL (1975). The distribution and anisotropy of the stiffness of cancellous bone in the human patella. J Biomechan8:363-367.
59.
Turner CH (1992). On Wolff's law of trabecular architecture. J Biomechan25:1-9.
60.
Turner CH, Cowin SC, Rho JY, Ashman RB, Rice JC ( 1990). The fabric dependence of the orthotropic elastic constants of cancellous bone. J Biomechan23:549-561.
61.
Vahey JW, Lewis JL, and Vanderby R. Jr (1987). Elastic moduli, yield stress, and ultimate stress of cancellous bone in the canine proximal femur. J Biomechan20:29-34.
62.
van Loon JP, de Bont GM, Boering G. (1995). Evaluation of temporomandibular joint prostheses: review of the literature from 1946 to 1994 and implications for future prosthesis designs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg53:984-996.
63.
Williams JL, Lewis JL (1982). Properties and an anisotropic model of cancellous bone from the proximal tibia epiphysis. J Biomechan Eng104:50-56.
64.
Wixson RL, Elasky N., Lewis J. (1989). Cancellous bone material properties in osteoarthritic and rheumatoid total knee patients. J Orthop Res7:885-892.
