The Role of the AADR in Promoting Research Integrity: Perspectives and Consensus Statements

Abstract

Keywords

ethics (research)research standards scientific misconduct code of ethics research integrity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bebeau MJ , Davis EL (1996). Survey of ethical issues in dental research. J Dent Res 75:845-855.

Bersoff DN (1996). Process and procedures for dealing with misconduct: A necessity or a nightmare? J Dent Res 75:836-840.

Camenisch PF (1996). The moral foundations of scientific ethics and responsibility. J Dent Res 75:825-831.

Frankel MS (1996). Developing ethical standards for responsible research: Why? Form? Functions? Process? Outcomes? J Dent Res 75:832-835.

Herzberg M. (1995). Editor's report. Proceedings, AADR

Council, 24th Annual Session, p. 46.

Breckenridge EG (1996). Personal communication: Director of Scientific Meetings, IADR/AADR Central Office, Alexandria, VA.

Lederberg J. (1995). Sloppy research exacts a greater toll than misconduct . The Scientist (February 20):13.

Nobel JJ (1990). Comparison of research quality guidelines in

10.

academic and nonacademic environments. J Am Med Assoc 263:1435-1437.

11.

Parker LS , Hollway J. (1993). Professional responsibilities toward incompetent or chemically dependent colleagues. In: Dental ethics. Weinstein BD , editor. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, pp. 101-116.