Abstract
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bebeau MJ
,
Davis EL
(1996 ). Survey of ethical issues in dental research . J Dent Res
75 :845 -855 .
2.
Bersoff DN
(1996 ). Process and procedures for dealing with misconduct: A necessity or a nightmare ? J Dent Res
75 :836 -840 .
3.
Camenisch PF
(1996 ). The moral foundations of scientific ethics and responsibility . J Dent Res
75 :825 -831 .
4.
Frankel MS
(1996 ). Developing ethical standards for responsible research: Why ? Form? Functions? Process? Outcomes? J Dent Res
75 :832 -835 .
5.
Herzberg M.
(1995 ). Editor's report. Proceedings , AADR
6.Council, 24th Annual Session , p. 46.
7.
Breckenridge EG
(1996 ). Personal communication: Director of Scientific Meetings , IADR/AADR Central Office, Alexandria, VA .
8.
Lederberg J.
(1995 ). Sloppy research exacts a greater toll than misconduct . The Scientist (February 20):13 .
9.
Nobel JJ
(1990 ). Comparison of research quality guidelines in
10.academic and nonacademic environments . J Am Med Assoc
263 :1435 -1437 .
11.
Parker LS
,
Hollway J.
(1993 ). Professional responsibilities toward incompetent or chemically dependent colleagues . In: Dental ethics .
Weinstein BD
, editor. Philadelphia : Lea & Febiger , pp. 101 -116 .