Contributions of Facial Morphology,Age,and Gender to EMG Activity Under Biting and Resting Conditions: A Canonical Correlation Analysis

Abstract

Theoretical studies suggest that facial morphology may confer a mechanical advantage to particular individuals during force production, but not during rest. However, prior studies on the relationship between facial morphology and EMG suffer from various methodological limitations. We examined the hypothesis that facial morphology variables contribute significantly and meaningfully to the variance in masticatory muscle EMG when subjects produce specific levels of interocclusal force, but not when subjects are at rest. Measures of facial morphology included gonial angle, ramus height, and maxillary height, as determined from lateral cephalograms. EMG data were obtained from surface electrodes placed on masseter and temporalis sites. Subjects (N = 96) sat in a darkened, sound-attenuated room while they watched a seven-minute segment of a movie. EMG activity obtained during the last two minutes was used as a baseline period. Using the central incisors, subjects then provided five different force levels ranging from 6.5 to 48 1b in random order on a bite-force device while EMG data were collected. A canonical correlation analysis, performed on the set of predictor variables (age, gender, and facial morphology measurements) and the set of criterion variables (EMG data), showed a significant canonical correlation between the two variable sets while biting, but not at rest. Age, but not the facial morphology variables, was highly related to the canonical variate. The data suggest that facial morphology variables examined in this study do not exert a meaningful influence on EMG data, at least when the task involves biting with the incisors over a broad range of bite forces obtained from a sample of subjects who vary deliberately with respect to age and gender.

Keywords

facial morphology bite force canonical correlation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahlgren J. (1986). EMG pattern of temporalis in normal occlusion . Eur J Orthod 8:185-191.

Ahlgren JGA , Ingervall BF , Thilander BL (1973). Muscle activity in normal and postnormal occlusion. Am J Orthod 64:445-456. Ahlgren J, Sonesson B, Blitz M (1985). An electromyographic analysis of the temporalis function of normal occlusion. Am J Orthod 87:230-239.

Bakke M. (1993). Mandibular elevator muscles: Physiology, action, and effect of dental occlusion. Scand J Dent Res 101:314-331.

Bakke M. , Michler L. (1991). Temporalis and masseter muscle activity in patients with anterior open bite and craniomandibular disorders. Scand J Dent Res 99:219-228. Fridlund AJ , Cacioppo JT (1986). Guidelines for human electromyographic research. Psychophysiology 23:567-589. Gay T. , Rendell J. , Majoureau A. , Maloney FT (1994). Estimating human incisal bite forces from the electromyogram/biteforce function . Arch Oral Biol 39:111-115.

Helkimo E. , Carlsson GE , Carmeli Y. (1975). Bite force in patients with functional disturbances of the masticatory system. J Oral Rehabil 2:397-406.

Kawazoe Y. , Kotani H. , Hamada T. (1979). Relation between integrated electromyographic activity and biting force during voluntary isometric contraction in human masticatory muscles. J Dent Res 58:1440-1449.

Lindauer SJ , Gay T. , Rendell J. (1991). Electromyographic-force characteristics in the assessment of oral function. J Dent Res 70:1417-1421.

Lowe AA , Takada K. (1984). Associations between anterior temporal, masseter, and orbicularis oris muscle activity and craniofacial morphology in children . Am J Orthod 86:319-330.

Lowe AA , Takada K. , Taylor LM (1983). Muscle activity during function and its correlation with craniofacial morphology in a sample of subjects with Class II, Division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod 84:204-211.

10.

Maton B. , Rendell J. , Gentil M. , Gay T. (1992). Masticatory muscle fatigue: Endurance times and spectral changes in the electromyogram during the production of sustained bite forces. Arch Oral Biol 37:521-529.

11.

Miralles R. , Hevia R. , Contreras L. , Carvajal R. , Bull R. , Manns A. (1991). Patterns of electromyographic activity in subjects with different skeletal facial types. Angle Orthod 61:277-284. Moller E. (1966). The chewing apparatus: An electromyographic study of the action of the muscles of mastication and its correlation to facial morphology. Acta Physiol Scand 69(Suppl 280):1-229.

12.

Nevakari K. (1956). An analysis of the mandibular movement from rest to occlusal position: A roentgenographiccephalometric investigation. Acta Odontol Scand 14(Suppl 19):1-129.

13.

Okeson JP (1989). Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. 2nd ed. St. Louis : C.V. Mosby, p. 15. Proffit WR , Fields HW , Nixon WL (1983). Occlusal forces in normal- and long-face adults. J Dent Res 62:566-571. Tabachnick BG , Fidell LS (1987). Using multivariate statistics. 2nd ed. New York: Harper & Row .

14.

Takada K. , Lowe AA , Freund VK (1984). Canonical correlations between masticatory muscle orientation and dentoskeletal morphology in children. Am J Orthod 86:331-341.

15.

Teenier TJ , Throckmorton GS , Ellis E. (1991). Effects of local anesthesia on bite force generation and electromyographic activity. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:360-365.

16.

Throckmorton GS , Dean JS ( 1994). The relationship between jaw-muscle mechanical advantage and activity levels during isometric bites in humans. Arch Oral Biol 39:429-437. Throckmorton GS , Finn RA , Bell WH (1980). Biomechanics of differences in lower facial height. Am J Orthod 77:410-420. Wood DP , Floreani KJ , Galil KA , Teteruck WR (1994). The effect of incisal bite force on condylar seating. Angle Orthod 64:53-61.