The influence of dentinal fluid and of a number of stress procedures on the quality of the margins of class V restorations located in both enamel and dentin was quantitatively assessed in vitro with the aid of a scanning electron microscope. The materials tested were GLUMA 2000 experimental, Prisma Universal Bond 3, and Syntac, together with the fine hybrid composites supplied by the respective manufacturers (Pekafill, AP.H, and Tetric). All materials achieved over 95% of "continuous margin" in enamel before and after stressing. In dentin, the initial values, with as well as without dentinal fluid simulation, were situated between 93.2 and 98.2%. With GLUMA 2000 experimental after stressing, a "continuous margin" occurred in only 50.2%, but with Prisma Universal Bond 3 and Syntac, the value was 79.0%. The influence of dentinal fluid simulation was dependent on the dentinal adhesive used. The effects of the various stress procedures were not significantly different.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Airoldi R., Krejci I., Lutz F. ( 1992). In vitro evaluation of actual dentin bonding agents in mixed class V cavities. Quint Int23:355-362.
2.
Blunck U., Pohl M., Dieker A. (1990). Extraktionszeitpunkt und kavitatenlage bei der in-vitro-prüfung von dentinhaftmitteln. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z45:639-642.
3.
Braem M., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G. (1986). Clinical evaluation of dental adhesive systems. II. A scanning electron microscopy study. J Prosthet Dent55:551-560.
4.
Darbyshire PA, Messer LB, Douglas WH (1988). Microleakage in class II composite restorations bonded to dentin using thermal and load cycling. J Dent Res67:585-587.
5.
Feilzer AJ (1989). Polymerization shrinkage stress in dental composite resin restorations (thesis). Amsterdam (The Netherlands) : Katholieke Universiteit.
6.
Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL (1987). Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res66:1636-1639.
7.
Fogel HM, Marshall FJ, Pashley DH (1988). Effects of distance from the pulp and thickness on the hydraulic conductance of human radicular dentin. J Dent Res67:1381-1385.
8.
Haller B., Klaiber B., Duerner U., Hofmann N. (1992). Dentinpermeabilitat nach behandlungmit cleanern und primern. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z47:171-175.
9.
Hansen EK (1986). Effect of cavity depth and application technique on marginal adaptation of resins in dentin cavities. J Dent Res65:1319-1321.
10.
Hasegawa Z., Manabe A., Itoh K., Wakumoto S. (1989). Investigation of self-etching dentin primers. Dent Mater J5:408-410.
11.
Kim S., Edwall L., Trowbridge H., Chien S. (1984). Effects of local anesthetics on pulpal blood flow in dogs. J Dent Res63:650-652.
12.
Krejci I., Reich T., Lutz F., Albertoni M. (1990). In-vitro-testverfahren zur evaluation dentaler restaurationssysteme. 1. Computergesteuerter kausimulator. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed100:953-960.
13.
Krejci I., Sagesser D., Lutz F. ( 1992). Optimierung der dentinhaftung in gemischten Klasse-V-kavitäten . Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed102:32-37.
14.
Lutz F. ( 1980). Beitrage zur entwicklung von seitenzahnkomposits (PhD thesis). Zurich (Switzerland): KAR/PAR/PZM .
15.
Mandras RS, Retief DH, Russell CM (1991). The effects of thermal and occlusal stresses on the microleakage of the Scotchbond 2 dentinal bonding system. Dent Mater7:63-67.
16.
McCabe JF, Carrick TE (1989). Output from visible-light activation units and depth of cure of light-activated composites. J Dent Res68:1534-1539.
17.
McGuckin RS, Tao L., Thompson WO, Pashley DH (1991). Shear bond strength of Scotchbond in vivo. Dent Mater7:50-53.
18.
Mitchem JC, Terkla LG, Gronas DG (1988). Bonding of resin dentin adhesives under simulated physiological conditions. Dent Mater4:351-353.
19.
Munksgaard EC, Itoh K., Jørgensen KD (1985). Dentin-polymer bond in resin fillings tested in vitro by thermo- and load-cycling. J Dent Res64:144-146.
20.
Nelsen RJ, Wolcott RB, Paffenbarger GC (1952). Fluid exchange at the margins of dental restorations . JAm Dent Assoc44:288-295.
21.
Olgart L., Gazelius B. (1977). Effect of adrenaline and felypressin (octapressin) on blood flow and sensory nerve activity in the tooth. Acta Odontol Scand35:69-75.
22.
Pashley DH, Kehl T., Pashley EL, Palmer P. (1981a). Comparison of in vitro and in vivo dog dentin permeability. J Dent Res60 :763-768.
23.
Pashley DH, Nelson R., Williams EC, Kepler EE (1981b). Use of dentine-fluid protein concentrations to measure pulp capillary reflection coefficients in dogs. Arch Oral Biol26:703-706.
24.
Pashley DH, Pashley EL (1991). Dentin permeability and restorative dentistry: A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent4:5-9.
25.
Prati C., Pashley DH, Montanari G. (1991). Hydrostatic intrapulpal pressure and bond strength of bonding systems. Dent Mater7 :54-58.
26.
Qvist V. (1983). The effect of mastication on marginal adaptation of composite restorations in vivo. J Dent Res62:904-906.
27.
Qvist V., Qvist J. (1985). Replica patterns on composite restorations performed in vivo with different acid-etch restorative procedures. Scand J Dent Res93:360-370.
28.
Ryge G., Cvar JF ( 1971). Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. San Francisco (CA): United States Dental Health Center, Government Printing Office, Publication No. 7902244.
29.
Soh G., Henderson LJ (1990). The influence of preparation site on the effectiveness of two dentine adhesives. Int J Prosthodont3:59-63.
30.
Tao L., Pashley DH (1989). Dentin perfusion effects on the shear bond strengths of bonding agents to dentin. Dent Mater5:181-184.
31.
Taylor MJ, Lynch E. (1992). Microleakage. J Dent20:3-10.
32.
Uno S., Asmussen E. (1991). Marginal adaptation of restorative resin polymerized at reduced rate. Scand J Dent Res99:440-444.
33.
Wu W., McKinney JE (1982). Influence of chemicals on wear of dental composites . J Dent Res61:1180-1183.
