Statistical Models for Evaluating the Penetrating Ability of Endodontic Instruments

Abstract

An in vitro study was conducted to evaluate the penetrating ability of hand instruments (No. 10 K-file and "Pathfinder") and an automated device with a No. 08 (Canal Finder System) file in 270 extracted curved and narrow molar roots. The roots were randomly allocated to six groups, each one corresponding to a different permutation of the three instruments. The experiment was performed in three sequential stages, and Stages II and III were undertaken only in roots where no apical penetration was achieved in the previous stage(s). Statistical models were designed to fit the resulting clinical data. The No. 08 Canal Finder System and No. 10 K-file proved to be similar in their penetrating ability in Stage I (with estimated probabilities of 71.1% and 68.8%, respectively). The No. 08 Canal Finder was found to be the most efficient in Stage II and especially in Stage III, with a probability of penetration of 20.7%, compared with 9.8% for the "Pathfinder" and 7.4% for the No. 10 K-file.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cimis, G.M. ; Boyer, T.J. ; and Pellen, G.B. (1988): Effect of Three File Types on Apical Preparations of Moderately Curved Canals, J Endodon 14:441-444.

Goldman, M. ; White, R.R. ; Moser, C.R. ; and Tenca, J.I. (1988): A Comparison of Three Methods of Cleaning and Shaping of the Root Canal in vitro, J Endodon 14:7-12.

Haberman, S.J. (1978): Analysis of Qualitative Data. Volume 1, Introductory Topics, New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc., pp. 64-69.

Harty, F.J. and Stock, C.J. (1974): The Giromatic System Compared with Hand Instrumentation in Endodontics, Br Dent J 137 :239-244.

Ingle, J.I. (1985): Endodontics, 3rd ed., Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, p. 187.

Levy, G. (1985): Etude Fondamentale sur le Principe de Fonctionnement d'un Systeme Automatise des Traitements Endodontiques le Canal Finder, L 'Information Dentaire 23:2233-2248.

Levy, G. ; Guetta, E. ; Bui, D.L. ; and Serano, P. (1985): Klinische Analyse der Anwendungsmoglichkeiten eines Maschinellen Systems zur Wurzelbehandlung "Das Canal Finder System", Die Quintessenz 10:1823-1836.

Maalouf, E. ; Sader, J. ; and Jabbour, G. (1987): Etude Clinique du "Canal Finder System", Chir Dent France 369 :165-170.

Mandel, E. (1988): Etude Expérimentale de la Dynamique Instrumentale Appliquee a un Systeme Automatise en Endodontie, L'Information Dentaire 7:473-480.

10.

Matloff, I.R. ; Jensen, J.R. ; Singer, L. ; and Tabibi, A. (1982): A Comparison of Methods Used in Root Canal Studies , Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 53:203-208.

11.

Metzger, Z. ; Nissan, R. ; Tagger, M. ; and Tamse, A. (1988): Apical Seal by Customized Versus Standardized Master Cones: A Comparative Study in Flat and Round Canals, J Endodon 14 :381-384.

12.

Miserendino, L.J. ; Miserendino, C.A. ; Moser, J.B. ; Heuer, M.A. ; and Osetek, E.M. (1988): Cutting Efficiency of Endodontic Instruments. Part III. Comparison of Sonic and Ultrasonic Instrument Systems, J Endodon 14:24-30.

13.

O'Connell, D.T. and Brayton, S.M. (1975): Evaluation of Root Canal Preparation with Two Automated Endodontic Handpieces, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 38:298-303.

14.

Rao, C.R. (1973): Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications , 2nd ed., New York, NY: John Wiley, pp. 354-374 and pp. 385-391.

15.

Roane, J.B. ; Sabala, C.L. ; and Duncanson, M.G. (1985): The "Balance Force" Concept for Instrumentation of Curved Canals, J Endodon 11:203-211.

16.

Sabala, C.L. ; Roane, J.B. ; and Southard, L.Z. (1988): Instrumentation of Curved Canals Using a Modified Tipped Instrument : A Comparison Study, J Endodon 14:59-64.

17.

Sepic, A.O. ; Pantera, E.A. ; Neaverth, E.J. ; and Ander-Son, R.W. (1989): A Comparison of Flex-R Files and K-Type Files for Enlarging of Severely Curved Molar Root Canals, J Endodon 15:240-245.

18.

Stamos, D.E. ; Sadeghi, E.M. ; Haasch, G.C. ; and Ger-Stein, H. (1987): An in vitro Comparison Study to Quantitate the Debridement Ability of Hand, Sonic and Ultrasonic Instrumentation, J Endodon 13:434-440.

19.

Tagger, M. ; Tamse, A. ; and Katz, A. (1983): Efficacy of Apical Seal of Engine Plugger Condensed Root Canal Fillings- Leakage to Dyes, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 56:641-646.

20.

Tagger, M. ; Tamse, A. ; Katz, A. ; and Korzen, B.H. (1984): Evaluation of the Apical Seal Produced by a Hybrid Root Canal Filling Method, Combining Lateral Condensation and Thermatic Compaction , J Endodon 10:299-303.

21.

Tamse, A. ; Katz, A. ; and Kurant, M. (1988): The Intentional Instrument Separation Technique Versus the Silver Cone Method: A Comparison of the Apical Seal, Int Endod J 21:268-272.

22.

Tronstad, L. and Niemczyk, S.P. (1986): Efficacy and Safety Tests of Six Automated Devices for Root Canal Instrumentation, Endod Dent Traumatol 2:270-276.

23.

Weine, F.S. ; Kelly, R.F. ; and Bray, K.E. (1976): Effect of Preparation with Endodontic Handpieces on Original Canal Shape, J Endodon 2:298-301.