Prevalence and Need for Replacement of Amalgam and Composite Restorations in Dutch Adults

Abstract

In 1986, the'first nationwide epidemiological survey of adult oral health and attitudes to oral health care was carried out in The Netherlands. One of the aims of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and the quality (in terms of need for replacement) of amalgam and composite restorations in the Dutch adult population.

A group of 600 dentate individuals, 20-44 years of age, was examined. Stratified cluster sampling included as factors age, gender, socio-economic status, and area of residence. Two additional parameters were studied: frequency of visiting a dentist and type of health insurance. Oral examinations consisted of direct (mirror and explorer) and indirect (color slides and bite-wing radiographs) observations with use of well-defined criteria.

On average, 13.4 restorations per individual were present, of which 23.3% were classified as unsatisfactory. A great difference in prevalence and quality data was found among several types of restorations. Test results (ANOVA) for effects of age, gender, socio-economic status, area of residence, frequency of visiting a dentist, and insurance on the prevalence of (un)satisfactory restorations resulted nearly always in significant effects of only age and frequency of visits to a dentist. There was a tendency (p<0.05) for the prevalence of (un)satisfactory restorations to be higher with increasing age. For individuals visiting a dentist infrequently (once or not at all in the past two years), the prevalence of restorations was lower, and the percentage of unsatisfactory restorations was higher, in comparison with individuals visiting a dentist frequently. The two major reasons for the scoring of restorations as clinically unacceptable were approximal ledges (43%) in class II restorations and marginal (secondary) caries (57%) in all other types of restorations.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allan, D.N. (1969): The Durability of Conservative Restorations, Br Dent J 126:172-177.

Anusavice, K.J. (1989): Criteria for Selection of Restorative Materials : Properties versus Technique Sensitivity. In: Quality Evaluation of Dental Restorations, K.J. Anusavice , Ed., Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., pp. 15-59.

Cohen, J.A. (1960): A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , Educ Psychol Measurement 20:37-46.

Crabb, H.S.M. (1981): The Survival of Dental Restorations in a Teaching Hospital, Br Dent J 150:315-318.

Dahl, J.E. and Eriksen, H.M. (1978): Reasons for Replacement of Amalgam Dental Restorations , Scand J Dent Res 86:404-407. Elderton, R.J. (1976): The Causes of Failure of Restorations: a Literature Review, J Dent 4:257-262.

Elderton, R.J. (1983): Longitudinal Study of Dental Treatment in the General Dental Service in Scotland, Br Dent J 155:91-96.

Eriksen, H.M. ; Bjertness, E. ; and Hansen, B.F. (1986): Cross-sectional Clinical Study of Quality of Amalgam Restorations, Oral Health and Prevalence of Recurrent Caries, Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 14:15-18.

Goldberg, J. ; Munster, E. ; Rydinge, E. ; Sanchez, L. ; and Lambert, K. (1980): Experimental Design in the Clinical Evaluation of Amalgam Restorations, J Biomed Mater Res 14 :777-788.

Kidd, E.A.M. (1989): Caries Diagnosis within Restored Teeth. In: Quality Evaluation of Dental Restorations, K.J. Anusavice , Ed., Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., pp. 111-123.

10.

Kroeze, H.J.P. (1989): Amalgam and Composite Restorations, Prevalence and Need for Replacement, Thesis, Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands, pp. 5 and 6.

11.

Kroeze, H.J.P. ; Ruiken, H.M.H.M. ; and van 't Hof, M.A. (1988): Evaluation of an Indirect Method for Assessing the Quality of Amalgam Restorations in Epidemiological Studies, Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 16:208-211.

12.

Landis, J.R. and Koch, G.G. (1977): An Application of Hierarchical Kappa Type Statistics in the Assessment of Majority Agreement among Multiple Observers, Biometrics 33:363-374.

13.

Mjor, LA (1981): Placement and Replacement of Restorations, Oper Dent 6:49-54.

14.

Moore, D.L. and Stewart, J.L. (1967): Prevalence of Defective Dental Restorations, J Prosthet Dent 17:372-376.

15.

Richardson, A.S. and Boyd, M.A. (1973): Replacement of Silver Amalgam Restorations by 50 Dentists during 246 Working Days, J Can Dent Assoc 8:556-559.

16.

Rossum, G. and Kalsbeek, H. (1985): Epidemiological Data on Caries and Periodontal Diseases in a Middle-sized Dutch Town. In: Dentist's Attendance and Oral Health, Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands, pp. 204-214.

17.

Rytomaa, I. ; Murtomaa, H. ; Turtola, L. ; and Lind, K. (1984): Clinical Assessment of Amalgam Fillings, Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 12:169-172.

18.

Skogedal, O. and Heloe, L.A. (1979): Clinical Quality of Amalgam Restorations, Scand J Dent Res 87:459-461.

19.

Truin, G.J. ; Burgersdijk, R.C.W. ; Groeneveld, A. ; Heling, G.W.J. ; van 't Hof, M.A. ; Kalsbeek, H. ; and Visser, R.S.M. (1987): Part I, Introduction, Materials and Methods. In: A Nationwide Epidemiological Survey of Adult Oral Health and Attitudes , Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen , The Netherlands.