Chemical Softening and Wear of Dental Composites

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to determine the influence of chemical food-simulating liquids on the wear of various commercial dental composite restoratives. In many cases, pre-conditioning the restoratives in these liquids for one week produced swelling of the polymer matrix and considerable surface damage. The resulting degradation reduced the hardness and enhanced the wear as measured by a pin-and-disc apparatus. Four kinds of commercial composites were investigated: a conventional quartz-filled, a strontium-glass-filled, a visible-light-activated, and a micro filled composite. The liquids employed were heptane and several aqueous solutions of ethanol with solubility parameters, 8, ranging from δ = 1.5 to 4.8 × 10⁴ J^1/2m^-3/2. With all restoratives, the decline in hardness during pre-conditioning maximized at about δ = 3 × 104, which corresponds to a 75% ethanol solution. The wear behavior was considerably more complicated and variable, as discussed in the text. For the most part, the increase in wear rate from pre-conditioning corresponded to the fall in hardness. A notable exception was for the strontium-glass-filled composite preconditioned in pure water. Here the wear was enhanced considerably, with no decrease in hardness. In this case, the degradation mode is assumed to be different from the others in that it is attributed to stress corrosion of the glass filler.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Society for Testing and Materials ( 1984): Knoop Indentation Hardness of Glass, Vol. 15.02, Designation C730, Philadelphia, PA: ASTM, pp. 421-486.

Atkinson, J.P. ; Brown, K.J. ; and Dowson, D. (1978): The Wear of High Molecular Weight Polyethylene , Trans Am Soc Mech Eng 100:208-218.

Burrell, H. (1975): Solubility Parameter Values. In: Polymer Handbook, J. Brandrup and E.H. Immergut , Eds., New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. iv, 337-359.

Charles, R.J. (1958): Static Fatigue of Glass, I, J Appl Phys 29:1549-1553.

Food and Drug Administration (1976): FDA Guidelines for Chemistry and Technology Requirements of Indirect Additive Petitions, Washington, DC: FDA, March, 1976.

Hildebrand, J.H. and Scott, R.L. (1950): Solubility of Non-Electrolytes, 3rd ed., New York, NY: Reinhold Publishing Co., pp. 424-434.

McKinney, J.E. (1982): Apparatus for Measuring Wear of Dental Restorative Materials, Wear 76:337-347.

McKinney, J.E. and Wu, W. (1982): Relationship Between Subsurface Damage and Wear of Dental Restorative Composites, J Dent Res 61:1083-1088.

Okazaki, M. and Douglas, W.H. (1984): Comparison of Surface Layer Properties of Composite Resins by ESCA, SEM and X-ray Diffractometry, Biomaterials 5:284-288.

10.

Soderholm, K.J. (1981): Degradation of Glass Filler in Experimental Composites , J Dent Res 60:1867-1875.

11.

Soderholm, K.J.M. (1983): Leaking of Fillers in Dental Composites, J Dent Res 62:126-130.

12.

Soderholm, K.J. (1984): Hydrolytic Degradation of Dental Composites, J Dent Res 63:1248-1254.

13.

Wu, W. and Cobb, E. (1981): A Silver Staining Technique for Investigating Wear of Restorative Dental Composites, J Biomed Mater Res 15:343-348.

14.

Wu, W. and McKinney, J.E. (1982): Influence of Chemicals on Wear of Dental Composites , J Dent Res 61:1180-1183.

15.

Wu, W. ; Toth, E.E. ; Moffa, J.F. ; and Ellison, J.A. (1984): Subsurface Damage Layer of in vivo Worn Dental Composite Restorations, J Dent Res 65:675-680.