Cubic splines were fitted to the maxillary dental arches of 27 children with permanent dentitions, all having Class I molar, cuspid, and buccal segment relationships. A set of data points was chosen to represent arch form, and of these points, five were used as knots of the spline. Error of the fit of the curve was evaluated through the analysis of normals to the curve computed from those points not used as knots. Analysis demonstrates that the errors are minimal, and the spline function appears to adequately represent either symmetric or asymmetric dental arch forms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Mills, L.F. and Hamilton, P.M.: Epidemiological Studies of Malalignment, A Method for Computing Dental Arch Circumference, Angle Orthod35:244-248, 1965.
2.
Biggerstaff, R.H.: Three Variations in Dental Arch Form Estimated by a Quadratic Equation, J Dent Res51:1509, 1972.
3.
Currier, J.H. : A Computerized Geometric Analysis of Human Dental Arch Form, Am J Orthod56:164-179, 1969.
4.
Hechter, F.J. : Symmetry and Dental Arch Form of Orthodontically Treated Patients, J Can Dent Assn44:173-184, 1978.
5.
Scott, J.H.: The Shape of the Dental Arches, J Dent Res36:996-1003, 1957.
6.
Burdi, A.R.: Morphogenesis of Mandibular Dental Arch Shape in Human Embryos, J Dent Res47:50-58, 1968.
7.
Burdi, A.R. and Lillie, J.H.: A Catenary Analysis of the Maxillary Dental Arch During Human Embryogenesis , Anat Rec154 :13-20,1966.
8.
MacConaill, M.A. and Scher, E.A.: The Ideal Form of the Human Dental Arcade, with Some Prosthetic Applications, Dent Rec69:285-302,1949.
9.
Pepe, S.H.: Polynomial and Catenary Curve Fits to Human Dental Arches, J Dent Res54:1124-1132,1975.
10.
Izard, G.: New Method for the Determination of the Normal Arch by the Function of the Face, Int J Orthod13:582-595, 1927.
11.
Lavelle, C. and Plant, C.: Comparison Between the Right and Left Sides of the Dental Arch, J Dent Res48:971, 1969.
12.
Handscomb, D.C. : Methods of Numerical Approximation, London: Bell & Bain, Ltd., 1965 .
13.
Shampine, L.F. and Allen, R.C.: Numerical Computing, Philadelphia: Saunders, 1973.
14.
Waldo, C.M. : Orthodontic Research as a Component Part of a Balanced Longitudinal Study of 100 Children, Int J Orthod and Oral Surg22:659-673, 1936.
15.
McDowell, R.M. : The Use of Lateral Head Radiographs for Evaluating Orthodontic Results as Distinguished from Growth Changes, Am J Orthod27:59-74, 1941.
16.
Begole, E.A. : A Computer Program for the Analysis of Dental Arch Form Using the Cubic Spline Function, Comput Program Biomed10:136-142, 1979.
Hellman, M. : Dimension Versus Form in Teeth and their Bearing on the Morphology of the Dental Arch, Int J Orthod and Oral Surg5:615-651, 1919.
19.
Bonwill, W.G.A. : Geometrical and Mechanical Laws of Articulation , Trans Odont Soc Penn, 119-133, 1884-1885.
20.
Broomell, I.N.: Anatomy and Histology of the Mouth and Teeth, Philadelphia : Blakiston, 1902.
21.
Hawley, C.A. : Determination of the Normal Arch and its Application to Orthodontia, Dent Cosmos47:541-552, 1905.
22.
Stanton, F.R. : Arch Predetermination and a Method of Relating the Predetermined Arch to the Malocclusion to Show the Minimum Tooth Movement , Int J Orthod8:757-778, 1922.
23.
Fisk, R.O.: Normal Mandibular Arch Changes Between Ages Nine-16, J Can Dent Assn32: 652-658, 1966.
24.
Lundstrom, A.: Some Asymmetries of the Dental Arches, Jaws, and Skull and their Etiological Significance, Am J Orthod47: 81, 1961.
