In ape dentitions the common molar size sequence is assumed to be M3 > M2 > M1. This sequence is held in contrast to the assumed human sequence, M1 > M2 > M3. Using mesiodistal, buccolingual, and cross-sectional area dimensions, this study indicates that the molar size progression in all three great ape species varies extensively from the assumed sequence.
Campbell, B.G. : Human Evolution: An Introduction to Man's Adaptations , 2nd ed., Chicago : Aldine, 1974, p. 197.
3.
Brabant, H. and Twiesselmann, F. : Observations sur l'évolution de la denture permanente humain en Europe occidentale, Bull du Group Inter pour la Res Scient en Stomat7:11-84, 1964.
4.
Brace, C.L. and Mahler, P.E.: Post-Pleistocene Changes in the Human Dentition, Am J Phys Anthrop34:191-204, 1971.
5.
Garn, S.M.; Lewis, A.B.; and Kerewsky, R.: Size Interrelationships of Mesial and Distal Teeth, J Dent Res44:350-354, 1965.
6.
Goaz, P.W.: Molar Size Sequence in the Peruvian Indian, J Dent Res54:1091, 1975.
7.
Goaz, P.W.: Molar Size Sequence in the Tarahumara Indian, J Dent Res55: 168, 1976.
8.
Kraus, B.S. : The Basis of Human Evolution, New York: Harper and Row, 1964, p. 201.
9.
Mahler, P.E. : Metric Variation in the Pongid Dentition , Unpub. Ph.D. Dissert.: The Univ. of Michigan, 1973, pp 6-14 and 374-467.
10.
Schuman, E.L. and Brace, C.L.: Metric and Morphologic Variations in the Liberian Chimpanzee; Comparisons with Anthropoid and Human Dentitions , Hum Biol26 :239-268.
