This study showed a statistically significant difference between the microhardness of reparative and primary dentin at both five- and eight-week intervals. Reparative dentin from occlusal trauma is harder than reparative dentin underlying a cavity preparation at the 99% level. No statistical difference was noted in the hardness of reparative dentin underlying different materials, but trends were observed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Sicher, H.: Orban's Oral Histology and Embryology, 5th ed., St. Louis: C.V. Mosby Co. , 1962, pp. 120-125.
2.
Mjor, I.A.: The Structure of Normal and Experimentally Altered Coronal Dentine , A Symposium on Dentine and Pulp: Their Structure and Reactions , Ed. Dundee: B.B. Symons Co., 1967. pp. 83-113.
3.
Hodge, H.C. and McKay, H.: The Microhardness of Teeth, JADA 20:2, 227-233, 1933.
4.
Burg, F.: Neue Spezielle Härtebestimmungen der Hartsubstanzen des Zahnes, Dissertation, Jena, 1921.
5.
Richter, H.: Härteprufung an Schmelz und Dentine II, Ztschr Stomatol29 :591-606,1931.
6.
Gustafson, G. and Kling, 0.: MicroHardness Measurements in the Human Dental Enamel , Odont Tidskrift 56:1, 24-44, 1948.
7.
Craig, R.G. and Peyton, F.A.: The Microhardness of Enamel and Dentin, J Dent Res37:661-668, 1958.
8.
Craig, R.G.; Gehring, P.E.; and Peyton, F.A.: Relation of Structure to the Microhardness of Human Dentin, J Dent Res38:624-630,1959.
9.
Wyckoff, R.W.G. and Croissant,0.: Microradiography of Dentine Using Characteristic X-rays , Biochemica et Biophysica Acta66:137-143, 1963.
10.
Skogedal, O. and Tronstad, L.: An Attempt to Correlate Dentin and Pulp Changes in Human Carious Teeth, Oral Surg43(1):135-140,1977.
11.
Mjör, I.A. : The Structure of Normal and Experimentally Altered Coronal Dentine, Dentine and Pulp - Their Structure and Reactions , Ed., Dundee: B. B. Symons Co. , 1968, pp. 83-99.
12.
Stanley, H. : The Rate of Tertiary (Reparative) Dentin Formation in the Human Tooth, Oral Path 21:(2):180-189, 1966.
13.
Goto, G.: The Rate of Reparative Dentin Formation in the Human Deciduous Teeth , Bull Tokyo Dent Coll13:251-256, 1972.
14.
Luostarinen, V.: Dental Pulp Response to Trauma: An Experimental Study in the Rat, Suom Hammasläak Toim, Suppl. II67:7-51,1971.
15.
Yoder, E.C.: Effect of Storage Media on the Roughness and Hardness of Root Dentin, Dissertation , Univ. of Mich., Ann Arbor, 1968.
16.
Cox, C.F. ; Heys, D.R.; and Heys, R.J.: A Gravity Perfusion Technique for Lab Animals , Lab Animal6(4): 18-22, Jul-Aug 1977.
17.
Massler, M.: Biologic Considerations in the Selection and Use of Restorative Materials , Dental Clinics of North America, March, 131-147,1965.
18.
Fusayama, T. and Maeda, T.: Effect of Pulpectomy on Dentin Hardness, J Dent Res 48:(3):452-460, 1969.
19.
Avery, J.K.: Theories of Mechanisms of Dentinal Bridge Formation. Pulp Biology Symposium I, 56th General Session, l.A.D.R. , Washington, D.C., 1978 .
20.
Takuma, S.; Yanagisawa, T.; and Lin, W.L.: Ultrastructural and Microanalytical Aspects of Developing Osteodentin in Rat Incisors, Calcif Tiss Res24:215-222, 1977.
