Eight ingredients of composite materials were evaluated individually for pulp irritation. None caused significant inflammation as evidenced by its average response. No abscess formations or lesions predominating in leukocytes occurred.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BOWEN, R. L.: Compatibility of Various Materials with Oral Tissues. I. The Components in Composite Restorations, (In this issue).
2.
Stanley, H.R.; Swerdlow, H.; and Buonocore, M.G.: Pulp Reactions to Anterior Restorative Materials, JADA73: 132-141,1967.
3.
Suarez, C.L.; Stanley, H.R.; and Gil-More, H.W.: Histopathologic Response of the Human Dental Pulp to Restorative Resins, JADA80:792-800, 1970.
4.
Stanley, H.R.; Going, R.E.; and Chauncey, H.H.: Human Pulp Response to Acid Pretreatment of Dentin and Composite Restoration , JADA91:817-825, 1975.
5.
Stanley, H.R.; Myers, L.; Heyde, J.; and Chamberlain, J.: Primate Response to an Ultraviolet Light Cured Restorative Material, J Oral Path1:108-114, 1972.
6.
Myers, L.L.; Stanley, H.R.; Heyde, J.B.; and Chamberlain, J.E. : Primate Pulpal Response to Ultraviolet Light Polymerized Direct Bonding Materials Systems, J Dent Res55:1118-1124, 1976.
7.
Baume, L.J.; and Fiore-Donno, G.: Response of the Human Pulp to a New Restorative Material, JADA76:1016-1022, 1968.
8.
Langeland, K. ; Dogon, L.I.; and Langeland , L.K.: Pulp Protection Requirements for Two Composite Resin Restorative Materials, Australian Dent J15: 349-360, 1970.
9.
Langeland, L.K. ; Guttuso, J.; Jerome, D.R.; and Langeland , K.: Histological and Clinical Comparison of Addent with Silicate Cements and Cold-Curing Materials, JADA72:373-385,1966.
10.
LEE, H.; ORLOWSKI, J.; and KOBASHIG-AWA, A.: Handbook of Dental Composite Restoratives, South El Monte, California: Lee Pharmaceuticals, 1973 .
11.
Buonocore, M.G.: A Simple Method of Increasing the Adhesion of Acrylic Filling Materials to Enamel Surfaces, J Dent Res34:849, 1955.
12.
Swanson, L.T. ; and Beck, J.F.: Factors Affecting Bonding to Human Enamel with Special Reference to a Plastic Adhesive, JADA61:581, 1960.
13.
Mulholland, R.D.; and DeShazer , D.O.: The Effect of Acidic Pretreatment Solutions on the Direct Bonding of Orthodontic Brackets to Enamel , Angle Orthod38: 236,1968.
14.
Gwinnett, A.J. ; and Matsui, A.: A Study of Enamel Adhesives. The Physical Relationship Between Enamel and Adhesive, Arch Oral Biol12:1615, 1967.
15.
Gwinnett, A.J. : Histological Changes in Human Enamel Following Treatment with Acidic Conditioning Agents, Arch Oral Biol16:731, 1971.
16.
Lee, B.D. ; Phillips, R.W.; and Swartz, M.L.: The Influence of Phosphoric Acid Etching on Retention of Acrylic Resin to Bovine Enamel, JADA82:1381, 1971.
17.
Laswell, H.R. ; Welk, D.A.; and Re-Genos , J.W.: Attachment of Resin Restorations to Acid Pretreated Enamel, JADA82: 558, 1971.
Retief, D.H. : Effect of Conditioning the Enamel Surface with Phosphoric Acid, J Dent Res52:333, 1973.
20.
Lee, H.L. ; Cupples, A.L.; Schubert, R.J.; and Swartz, M.L.: An Adhesive Dental Restorative Material , J Dent Res50:125-132,1971.
21.
Unpublished data, H. R. Stanley, 1971.
22.
American Dental Association, Council on Dental Materials and Devices: Recommended Standard Practices for Biological Evaluation of Dental Materials , JADA84 :382-387,1972.
23.
Stanley, H.R. : Design for a Human Pulp Study, Oral Surg25:633-647, April 1968 and 756-764, May 1968.
24.
BOWEN, R. L.: Adhesive Bonding of Various Materials to Hard Tooth Tissues XIX: Solubility of Dentinal Smear Layer in Dilute Acid Buffers, International Dent J, June 1978.
