The accuracy of prediction of three mixed dentition analyses was compared. Hixon and Oldfather's method was found to be the most accurate. A simplified version of the analysis obviates referral to a table, allowing assessment of the size of the unerupted teeth prior to eruption of the lateral incisor.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Hixon, E.H., and Oldfather, R.E.: Estimation of the Sizes of Unerupted Cuspid and Bicuspid Teeth, Angle Orthod28:236-240, 1958.
2.
Moyers, R.E. : Handbook of Orthodontics for the Student and General Practitioner (3rd ed), Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1973, p 369.
3.
Tanaka, M.M. , and Johnston, L.E.: The Prediction of the Size of Uneruppted Can-ines and Premolars in a Contemporary Orthodontic Population , JADA88:798, 1974.
4.
Ballard, M.L. , and Wylie, W.L.: Mixed Dentition Case Analysis-Estimating the Size of Unerupted Permanent Teeth, Am J Orthod33:754-759, 1947.
5.
Bolton, W.A. : Disharmony in Tooth Size and Its Relation to the Analysis and Treat; ment of Malocclusion, Angle Orthod28: 113-130, 1958.
6.
Stahle, H.: Determination of Mesiodistal Crown Width of Unerupted Permanent Cuspids and Bicuspids, Helv Odontol Acta3: 14-17, 1959.
