The distribution and bacterial content of splatter particles emanating from a patient's mouth during dental procedures was studied in a controlled environment operatory. Levels of contamination far exceeding those produced by common oral activities were observed. Suction and preoperative oral hygiene procedures are not effective in reducing contamination from bacterial splatters, and the modification of certain procedures and the use of protective shields or glasses is advised.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Riley, R.L., and O'Grady, F.: Airborne Infection, Riverside, NJ: Macmillan Company, 1961, p 25.
2.
Belting, C.M. ; Haberfeld, G.C.; and Juhl, L.K.: Spread of Organisms from Dental Air Rotor , JADA68:34-47, 1964.
3.
Webster Colloquial Dictionary, Cleveland: World Publishing Company, 1962, pp 94 and 615.
4.
Micik, R.S.; Miller, R.L.; Mazzarella, M.A.; and Ryge, G.: Studies on Dental Aerobiology: I. Bacterial Aerosols Generated During Dental Procedures, J Dent Res48:49-56, 1969.
5.
Wyler, D.; Miller, R.L.; and Micik, R.E.: Efficacy of Self Administered Preoperative Oral Hygiene Procedures in Reducing the Concentration of Bacteria in Aerosols Generated During Dental Procedures, submitted for publication, J Dent Res.
6.
Travaglini, E.A., and Larato, D.C.: A Disposable Face Mask with a Plastic Eye Shield for Operating with the Air Turbine Drill, J Prosth Dent15:525-527, 1965.
7.
Micik, R.E.; Miller, R.L.; and Leong, A.C.: Studies on Dental Aerobiology: III. Efficacy of Surgical Masks in Protecting Dental Personnel from Airborne Bacterial Particles, J Dent Res50:626-630, 1971.
8.
Caldarone, C.V. : A Protective Shield for High Speed Equipment , J. Prosth Dent47: 583-584, 1966.
