American Dental Association Specifications for Dental Materials, p. 17. Chicago, A.D.A., 1956.
2.
McDonald, R.E., and Phillips , R.W.Clinical Observations on a Contracting Amalgam Alloy, J. dent. Res., 29:482-85, 1950.
3.
Fischer, C.H. , and Lehwald, H.Neuartige Untersuchungen über die Dimensionsanderungen der Amalgame wahrend der Erhaltung, Dtsch. Zahn-, Mund- u. Kieferheilk., 20:463-80, 1954.
4.
Mitchell, J.A. , Schoonover, I.C., Dickson , G., and Vacher, H.C.Some Factors Affecting the Dimensional Stability of the Ag-Sn-(Cu-Zn) Amalgam, J. dent. Res., 34:273-86, 1955.
5.
Skinner, E.W., and Phillips, R.W.The Science of Dental Materials, p. 366. 5th ed., Philadelphia & London: W. B. Saunders Co., 1960.
6.
Souder, W., and Paffenbarger, G.C.Physical Properties of Dental Materials. (National Bureau of Standards Circular C433.)Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Printing Office, 1942.
7.
Fischer, C.H. , and Franke, K.Vergleichende Untersuchungen über das Dimensionsverhalten von Amalgamen bei verschiedenen Messmethoden, Dtsch. zahnarztl. Z., 9:402-14, 1954.
8.
Fujii, M., Horibe, T., and Kameta, T.Measuring Apparatus for Setting Expansion of Silver-Tin Amalgam, Japanese National Institute of Hygienic Sciences Report, No. 72, pp. 295-300, 1954 (written in Japanese).
9.
Crawford, W.H. , and Larson, J.H.Residual Mercury Determination Process, J. dent. Res., 32: 713, 1953.
Swartz, M.L. , and Phillips, R.W.A Study of Amalgam Condensation Procedures with Emphasis on the Residual Mercury Content of the Increments , J. dent. Res., 33:12-19, 1954.
12.
-. Residual Mercury Content of Amalgam Restorations and its Influence on Compressive Strength, J. dent. Res., 35:458-66, 1956.
13.
Ryge, G.Mercury Analysis by Fluorescent X-ray Spectroscopy, J. dent. Res., 37:359-67, 1958.
14.
Caul, H.J., and Schoonover, I.C.Analysis of Dental Amalgams Containing Mercury, Silver, Gold, Tin, Copper, and Zinc, J. Res. National Bureau of Standards, 26:481, 1941.
15.
Fujii, M., and Tsuji, K.Study of Constant Potential Electrolysis: Part 4; Analysis of Silver, Copper and Mercury by Means of E.D.T.A, J. Japanese Res. Soc. of dent. Materials and Appliances, 6:48-50, 1961 (written in Japanese).
16.
Ward, M.L., and Scott, E. 0. Effect of Variations in Manipulation on Dimensional Change, Crushing Strength, and Flow of Amalgam, J. Amer. dent. Ass., 19:1683-1705, 1932.
17.
Gray, A.W.Metallographic Phenomena Observed in Amalgams, J. nat. dent. Ass., 6:513-31, 909, 1919.
18.
Gayler, M.L.V.Some Factors Affecting the Setting of a Dental Amalgam, Brit. dent. J., 54:267-88, 1933.
19.
Ware, A.L., and Docking, A.R.The Effects of Manipulative Variables on Dental Amalgam, Aust. dent. J., 58:283-360, 1954.
20.
Wilson, R.T. , Phillips, R.W., and Norman, R.D.Influence of Certain Condensation Procedures upon the Mercury Content of Amalgam Restorations, J. dent. Res., 36:458-61, 1957.
21.
Eames, W.B., Skinner, E.W., and Mizera, G.T.Amalgam Strength Values Relative to Mercury Percentages and Plasticity , J. prosth. Dent., 11:765-71, 1961.
22.
Peyton, F.A. , and Liatukas, E.L.Compressive Strength of Amalgam as Influenced by Different Condensation Forces , J. prosth. Dent., 11:934-41, 1961.
23.
Ryge, G., Dickson, G., Smith, D.L., and Schoonover, 1. C. DentalAmalgam: The Effect of Mechanical Condensation on Some Physical Properties , J. Amer. dent. Ass., 45:269-77, 1952.