Abstract
Despite well-established connections between oral and systemic health, electronic health records (EHRs) and electronic dental records (EDRs) remain largely siloed due to infrastructural and interoperability challenges. This separation limits interdisciplinary care and data-driven research to generate practice-based evidence. We developed and validated 4 algorithmic frameworks specifically designed to link EHR with EDR across nonintegrated systems. Using data from more than 1.7 million medical records and 222,480 dental records spanning a 10-y period at Temple University, we evaluated 4 linkage strategies: (1) direct Social Security number matching, (2) unweighted similarity scoring, (3) weighted average similarity scoring, and (4) a probabilistic expectation-conditional maximization classification model. We compared these approaches using expert-reviewed validation of 1,000 candidate record pairs and selected optimal similarity thresholds for high-fidelity linkages. Our weighted average similarity algorithm demonstrated the best performance with 100% specificity (correctly avoiding false matches), 99% sensitivity (correctly identifying all true matches), and 99% accuracy (proportion of all correct linkages out of total comparisons) at the threshold of 0.82 for successfully linking 121,771 unique patients and 144,229 patients’ linkage with 96% sensitivity, 78% specificity, and 89% accuracy. After linking the datasets, the completeness of key patient demographic information significantly improved, with missing race data reduced from 79% to 11% and missing ethnicity data from 82% to 17%. We designed the algorithm to be transparent and vendor neutral, making it potentially adaptable to any institution or practice regardless of their existing EHR/EDR systems. This provides a foundation for developing a clinical decision support systems that facilitate real-time health information exchange, supporting safer dental procedures, timely medical referrals, and integrative research. Our findings provide a critical bridge between medicine and dentistry, which have remained largely divorced from each other. Future work will focus on multi-institutional validation, implementation, and integration into routine clinical workflows.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
