Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 2003. Concise international chemical assessment document 50. Elemental mercury and inorganic mercury compounds: human health aspects. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization.
2.
Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry, Public Health Service. 1999. Toxicological profile for mercury. Atlanta (GA): US Department of Health and Human Services.
3.
AggarwalVRPavittSWuJNattressBFranklinPOwenJWoodDVinall-CollierK.2019. Assessing the perceived impact of post Minamata amalgam phase down on oral health inequalities: a mixed-methods investigation. BMC Health Serv Res. 19(1):985.
4.
AjiboyeASDawsonDRFoxCH. 2018. American Association for Dental Research policy statement on community water fluoridation. J Dent Res. 97(12):1293–1296.
AnglenJGruningerSEChouH-NWeuveJTurykMEFreelsSStaynerLT. 2015. Occupational mercury exposure in association with prevalence of multiple sclerosis and tremor among US dentists. J Am Dent Assoc. 146(9):659–668.e1.
7.
BaekH-JKimE-KLeeSGJeongS-HSakongJMerchantATImS-USongK-BChoiY-H. 2016. Dental amalgam exposure can elevate urinary mercury concentrations in children. Int Dent J. 66(3):136–143.
8.
BakhurjiEScottTSohnW. 2019. Factors associated with pediatric dentists’ choice of amalgam: choice-based conjoint analysis approach. JDR Clin Trans Res. 4(3):246–254.
9.
Bedir FindikRCelikHTErsoyAOTasciYMoralogluOKarakayaJ. 2016. Mercury concentration in maternal serum, cord blood, and placenta in patients with amalgam dental fillings: effects on fetal biometric measurements. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 29(22):3665–3669.
10.
BellingerDCTrachtenbergFBarregardLTavaresMCernichiariEDanielDMcKinlayS. 2006. Neuropsychological and renal effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 295(15):1775–1783.
11.
BerdousesEVaidyanathanTKDastaneAWeiselCHouptMSheyZ. 1995. Mercury release from dental amalgams: an in vitro study under controlled chewing and brushing in an artificial mouth. J Dent Res. 74(5):1185–1193.
12.
BernardoMLuisHMartinMDLerouxBGRueTLeitãoJDeRouenTA. 2007. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 138(6):775–783.
13.
CADTH. 2018. Composite resin versus amalgam for dental restorations: a health technology assessment. Ottawa (Canada): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.
14.
DeRouenTAMartinMDLerouxBGTownesBDWoodsJSLeitãoJCastro-CaldasALuisHBernardoMRosenbaumG, et al. 2006. Neurobehavioral effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 295(15):1784–1792.
15.
DyeBASchoberSEDillonCFJonesRLFryarCMcDowellMSinksTH. 2005. Urinary mercury concentrations associated with dental restorations in adult women aged 16–49 years: United States, 1999–2000. Occup Environ Med. 62(6):368–375.
16.
EltahlahDLynchCDChadwickBLBlumIRWilsonNHF. 2018. An update on the reasons for placement and replacement of direct restorations. J Dent. 72:1–7.
17.
FerracaneJL. 2001. Materials in dentistry: principles and applications. Baltimore (MD): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
18.
GoldingJSteerCDGregorySLoweryTHibbelnJRTaylorCM. 2016. Dental associations with blood mercury in pregnant women. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 44(3):216–222.
19.
GoodrichJMChouH-NGruningerSEFranzblauABasuN. 2016. Exposures of dental professionals to elemental mercury and methylmercury. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 26(1):78–85.
20.
HsuY-CChangC-WLeeH-LChuangC-CChiuH-CLiW-YHorngJ-TFuE. 2016. Association between history of dental amalgam fillings and risk of Parkinson’s disease: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Taiwan. PLoS One. 11(12):e0166552.
JamilNBaqarMIlyasSQadirAArslanMSalmanMAhsanNZahidH. 2016. Use of mercury in dental silver amalgam: an occupational and environmental assessment. Biomed Res Int. 2016:6126385.
23.
Khwaja MahmoodANawazSAli SaeedW. 2016. Mercury exposure in the work place and human health: dental amalgam use in dentistry at dental teaching institutions and private dental clinics in selected cities of Pakistan. Rev Environ Health. 31(1):21–27.
24.
LygreGBHaugKSkjærvenRBjörkmanL. 2016. Prenatal exposure to dental amalgam and pregnancy outcome. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 44(5):442–449.
25.
MeyerDMKasteLMLituriKMTomarSFoxCHPetersenPE. 2016. Policy development fosters collaborative practice: the example of the Minamata Convention on Mercury. Dent Clin North Am. 60(4):921–942.
Naimi-AkbarASandborgh-EnglundGEkbomAEkstrandJNäsmanPMontgomeryS. 2014. Mortality among sons of female dental personnel—a national cohort study. J Perinat Med. 42(5):655–661.
National Center for Toxicological Research, US Food and Drug Administration. 2009. White paper: FDA update/review of potentional adverse health risks associated with exposure to mercury in dental amalgam. Jefferson (AR): US Department of Health and Human Services.
30.
PalkovicovaLUrsinyovaMMasanovaVYuZHertz-PicciottoI. 2008. Maternal amalgam dental fillings as the source of mercury exposure in developing fetus and newborn. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 18(3):326–331.
31.
Rasines AlcarazMGVeitz-KeenanASahrmannPSchmidlinPRDavisDIheozor-EjioforZ. 2014. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (3):CD005620.
32.
RitchieKABurkeFJTGilmourWHMacdonaldEBDaleIMHamiltonRMMcGowanDABinnieVCollingtonDHammersleyR. 2004. Mercury vapour levels in dental practices and body mercury levels of dentists and controls. Br Dent J. 197(10):625–632.
SonciniJAMaserejianNNTrachtenbergFTavaresMHayesC. 2007. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings from the New England Children’s Amalgam Trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 138(6):763–772.
35.
SunY-HNforONHuangJYLiawYP. 2015. Association between dental amalgam fillings and Alzheimer’s disease: a population-based cross-sectional study in Taiwan. Alzheimers Res Ther. 7(1):65.
UN Environment. 2019. Global mercury assessment 2018. Geneva (Switzerland): UN Environment Programme, Chemicals and Health Branch.
38.
US Food and Drug Administration. 2019. Epidemiological evidence on the adverse health effects reported in relation to mercury from dental amalgam. Silver Spring (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services.
39.
VähäsarjaNMontgomerySSandborgh-EnglundGEkbomAEkstrandJNäsmanPNaimi-AkbarA. 2016. Neurological disease or intellectual disability among sons of female Swedish dental personnel. J Perinat Med. 44(4):453–460.