Bone condensation is thought to densify interfacial bone and thus improve implant primary stability, but scant data substantiate either claim. We developed a murine oral implant model to test these hypotheses. Osteotomies were created in healed maxillary extraction sites 1) by drilling or 2) by drilling followed by stepwise condensation with tapered osteotomes. Condensation increased interfacial bone density, as measured by a significant change in bone volume/total volume and trabecular spacing, but it simultaneously damaged the bone. On postimplant day 1, the condensed bone interface exhibited microfractures and osteoclast activity. Finite element modeling, mechanical testing, and immunohistochemical analyses at multiple time points throughout the osseointegration period demonstrated that condensation caused very high interfacial strains, marginal bone resorption, and no improvement in implant stability. Collectively, these multiscale analyses demonstrate that condensation does not positively contribute to implant stability.
BlancoJSuárezJNovioSVillaverdeGRamosISegadeLA. 2008. Histomorphometric assessment in human cadavers of the peri-implant bone density in maxillary tuberosity following implant placement using osteotome and conventional techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res. 19(5):505–510.
2.
CehreliMCKökatAMComertAAkkocaoğluMTekdemirIAkçaK. 2009. Implant stability and bone density: assessment of correlation in fresh cadavers using conventional and osteotome implant sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res. 20(10):1163–1169.
3.
DegidiMPerrottiVStrocchiRPiattelliAIezziG. 2009. Is insertion torque correlated to bone-implant contact percentage in the early healing period? A histological and histomorphometrical evaluation of 17 human-retrieved dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 20(8):778–781.
4.
DonatiMBotticelliDLa ScalaVTomasiCBerglundhT. 2013. Effect of immediate functional loading on osseointegration of implants used for single tooth replacement: a human histological study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 24(7):738–745.
5.
FanuscuMIChangTLAkçaK. 2007. Effect of surgical techniques on primary implant stability and peri-implant bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 65(12):2487–2491.
6.
GiesenEBLamerigtsNMVerdonschotNBumaPSchreursBWHuiskesR. 1999. Mechanical characteristics of impacted morsellised bone grafts used in revision of total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 81(6):1052–1057.
7.
HahnJ. 1999. Clinical uses of osteotomes. J Oral Implantol. 25(1):23–29.
8.
HardistyMRZauelRStoverSMFyhrieDP. 2013. The importance of intrinsic damage properties to bone fragility: a finite element study. J Biomech Eng. 135(1):011004.
9.
HayesWCBouxseinML. 1997. Biomechanics of cortical and trabecular bone: implications for assessment of fracture risk. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott-Raven.
10.
HuwaisSMeyerEG. 2017. A novel osseous densification approach in implant osteotomy preparation to increase biomechanical primary stability, bone mineral density, and bone-to-implant contact. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 32(1):27-36.
11.
KabelJOdgaardAVan RietbergenBHuiskesR. 1999. Connectivity and the elastic properties of cancellous bone. Bone. 24(2):115–120.
KilkennyCBrowneWCuthillICEmersonMAltmanDG; National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Amimals in Research. 2011. Animal research: reporting in vivo experiments—the ARRIVE guidelines. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 31(4):991–993.
14.
KoutouzisTKoutouzisGTomasiCLundgrenT. 2011. Immediate loading of implants placed with the osteotome technique: one-year prospective case series. J Periodontol. 82(11):1556–1562.
15.
LanSLuoSHuhBKChandraAAltmanARQinLLiuXS. 2013. 3D image registration is critical to ensure accurate detection of longitudinal changes in trabecular bone density, microstructure, and stiffness measurements in rat tibiae by in vivo microcomputed tomography (μCT). Bone. 56(1):83–90.
16.
LekholmUZarbG. 1985. Patient selection and preparation. Chicago (IL): Quintessence.
17.
MarkovićACalasanDColicSStojcev-StajcicLJanjicBMisicT. 2011. Implant stability in posterior maxilla: bone-condensing versus bone-drilling: a clinical study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 112(5):557–563.
18.
MarkovićAMišićTMiličićBCalvo-GuiradoJLAleksićZÐinićA. 2013. Heat generation during implant placement in low-density bone: effect of surgical technique, insertion torque and implant macro design. Clin Oral Implants Res. 24(7):798–805.
19.
MonjeAGonzález-GarciaRMonjeFChanHLGalindo-MorenoPSuarezFWangHL. 2015. Microarchitectural pattern of pristine maxillary bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 30(1):125–132.
20.
MoriSHarruffRBurrDB. 1993. Microcracks in articular calcified cartilage of human femoral heads. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 117(2):196–198.
21.
MouraretSHunterDJBardetCBrunskiJBBouchardPHelmsJA. 2014. A pre-clinical murine model of oral implant osseointegration. Bone. 58:177–184.
22.
MouraretSHunterDJBardetCPopelutABrunskiJBChaussainCBouchardPHelmsJA. 2014. Improving oral implant osseointegration in a murine model via wnt signal amplification. J Clin Periodontol. 41(2):172–180.
23.
NkenkeEKlossFWiltfangJSchultze-MosgauSRadespiel-TrögerMLoosKNeukamFW. 2002. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic analysis of bone remodelling after installation of implants using an osteotome technique. Clin Oral Implants Res. 13(6):595–602.
24.
NobregaARNortonASilvaJASilvaJPBrancoFMAnituaE. 2012. Osteotome versus conventional drilling technique for implant site preparation: a comparative study in the rabbit. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 32(3):e109–e115.
25.
O’MahonyAMWilliamsJLKatzJOSpencerP. 2000. Anisotropic elastic properties of cancellous bone from a human edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res. 11(5):415–421.
26.
PoundarikAAVashishthD. 2015. Multiscale imaging of bone microdamage. Connect Tissue Res. 56(2):87–98.
27.
ProffPBayerleinTRottnerKMaiRFanghänelJGedrangeT. 2008. Effect of bone conditioning on primary stability of frialit-2 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 19(1):42–47.
28.
ShahNJHyderMNMoskowitzJSQuadirMAMortonSWSeehermanHJPaderaRFSpectorMHammondPT. 2013. Surface-mediated bone tissue morphogenesis from tunable nanolayered implant coatings. Sci Transl Med. 5(191):191ra183.
29.
ShayestehYSKhojastehASiadatHMonzaviABassirSHHossainiMAlikhasiM. 2013. A comparative study of crestal bone loss and implant stability between osteotome and conventional implant insertion techniques: a randomized controlled clinical trial study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 15(3):350–357.
30.
SiddiquiAASosovickaM. 2006. Lateral bone condensing and expansion for placement of endosseous dental implants: a new technique. J Oral Implantol. 32(2):87–94.
SummersRB. 1994. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compendium. 15(2):152, 154–156, 158.
33.
SzabóMEZekonyteJKatsamenisOLTaylorMThurnerPJ. 2011. Similar damage initiation but different failure behavior in trabecular and cortical bone tissue. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 4(8):1787–1796.
34.
TabassumAMeijerGJWalboomersXFJansenJA. 2014. Evaluation of primary and secondary stability of titanium implants using different surgical techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res. 25(4):487–492.
35.
TanoueRKoiKYamashitaJ. 2015. Effect of alendronate on boneformation during tooth extraction wound healing. J Dent Res. 94(9):1251–1258.
36.
TrisiPBerardiniMFalcoAPodaliri VulpianiM. 2016. New osseodensification implant site preparation method to increase bone density in low-density bone: in vivo evaluation in sheep. Implant Dent. 25(1):24–31.
37.
VirdiASIrishJSenaKLiuMKeHZMcNultyMASumnerDR. 2015. Sclerostin antibody treatment improves implant fixation in a model of severe osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 97(2):133–140.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
