The authors aimed to critically review the literature regarding the relationship between retention of teeth and oral health–related quality of life (OHRQoL) and the extent to which tooth retention can ensure OHRQoL among adults. The authors investigated studies that assessed the relationship between number of teeth and OHRQoL and how the position, type, and/or pattern of the teeth is related to OHRQoL. Relevant papers published in English from January 2004 to September 2015 were searched via PubMed and EMBASE. Twenty-nine papers—including cross-sectional, longitudinal, clinical trial, and case-control studies—were included and categorized according to 4 subthemes to achieve the stated aim: 1) number of teeth or missing teeth and OHRQoL, 2) occluding pairs or functional units and OHRQoL, 3) position of remaining or missing teeth and OHRQoL, and 4) shortened dental arches (SDAs) and OHRQoL. The main findings for each subtheme were as follows: 1) A significant association between number of teeth and OHRQoL was shown in most studies; however, those studies found different cutoff points regarding the number of teeth that affect OHRQoL, after adjusting for other factors in the analyses (e.g., age, sex, cultural background, and study locations). 2) The number of occluding pairs and the location of remaining teeth have great impacts on OHRQoL. 3) Having fewer anterior occluding pairs had a greater negative impact on aesthetics and thus affected OHRQoL. 4) Two randomized clinical trials on SDAs indicated that people with SDAs do not show worse OHRQoL than do those with removable dentures. The only 2 population-based studies on SDAs showed that adults with SDAs have no impaired OHRQoL when compared with those having more natural teeth. To conclude, this review found evidence that retention of teeth is associated with better OHRQoL. The number of occluding pairs and the location of remaining teeth have great impacts on OHRQoL. People with SDAs maintain an acceptable level of OHRQoL.
AbuzarMAHumplikAJShahimN.2015. The shortened dental arch concept: awareness and opinion of dentists in Victoria, Australia. Aust Dent J. 60(3):294–300.
3.
AdulyanonSSheihamA.1997. Oral impacts on daily performances. In: SladeGD, editor. Measuring oral health and quality of life. Chapel Hill (NC): University of North Carolina. p. 152–160.
4.
Al-OmiriMKKarasnehJALynchELameyPJCliffordTJ. 2009. Impacts of missing upper anterior teeth on daily living. Int Dent J. 59(3):127–132.
5.
AllenPFJepsonNJDoughtyJBondS.2008. Attitudes and practice in the provision of removable partial dentures. Br Dent J. 204(1):E2. Erratum in Br Dent J. 2008;204(2):54.
6.
AllenPFO’SullivanMLockerD.2009. Determining the minimally important difference for the Oral Health Impact Profile–20. Eur J Oral Sci. 117(2):129–134.
7.
AnderssonPHakebergMKarlbergGOstbergAL. 2010. Clinical correlates of oral impacts on daily performances. Int J Dent Hyg. 8(3):219–226.
8.
AntunesJLTanHPeresKGPeresMA. 2016. Impact of shortened dental arches on oral health–related quality of life. J Oral Rehabil. 43(3):190–197.
9.
AtchisonKADolanTA. 1990. Development of Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index. J Dent Educ. 54(11):680–687.
10.
AvilaGGalindo-MorenoPSoehrenSMischCEMorelliTWangHL. 2009. A novel decision-making process for tooth retention or extraction. J Periodontol. 80(3):476–91.
11.
BabaKIgarashiYNishiyamaAJohnMTAkagawaYIkebeKIshigamiTKobayashiHYamashitaS.2008a. The relationship between missing occlusal units and oral health–related quality of life in patients with shortened dental arches. Int J Prosthodont. 21(1):72–74.
12.
BabaKIgarashiYNishiyamaAJohnMTAkagawaYIkebeKIshigamiTKobayashiHYamashitaS.2008b. Patterns of missing occlusal units and oral health–related quality of life in SDA patients. J Oral Rehabil. 35(8):621–628.
13.
BatistaMJLawrenceHPde Sousa MdaL.2014. Impact of tooth loss related to number and position on oral health quality of life among adults. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 12:165.
14.
BrennanDSSpencerAJRoberts-ThomsonKF. 2008. Tooth loss, chewing ability and quality of life. Qual Life Res. 17(2):227–235.
15.
DahlKEWangNJSkauIOhrnK.2011. Oral health–related quality of life and associated factors in Norwegian adults. Acta Odontol Scand. 69(4):208–214.
16.
El OstaNTubert-JeanninSHennequinMBou Abboud NaamanNEl OstaLGeahchanN. 2012. Comparison of the OHIP-14 and GOHAI as measures of oral health among elderly in Lebanon. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 10:131.
17.
FejerskovOEscobarGJossingMBaelumV.2013. A functional natural dentition for all—and for life? The oral healthcare system needs revision. J Oral Rehabil. 40(9):707–722.
18.
GagliardiDISladeGDSandersAE. 2008. Impact of dental care on oral health–related quality of life and treatment goals among elderly adults. Aust Dent J. 53(1):26–33.
19.
GerritsenAEAllenPFWitterDJBronkhorstEMCreugersNH. 2010. Tooth loss and oral health–related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 8:126.
20.
HasselAJKokeUSchmitterMRammelsbergP.2006. Factors associated with oral health–related quality of life in institutionalized elderly. Acta Odontol Scand. 64(1):9–15.
21.
HobdellMPetersenPEClarksonJJohnsonN.2003. Global goals for oral health 2020. Int Dent J. 53(5):285–258.
22.
HoushmandMHoltfreterBBergMHSchwahnCMeiselPBiffarRKindlerSKocherT.2012. Refining definitions of periodontal disease and caries for prediction models of incident tooth loss. J Clin Periodontol. 39(7):635–644.
23.
HsuKJLeeHEWuYMLanSJHuangSTYenYY. 2014. Masticatory factors as predictors of oral health–related quality of life among elderly people in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan. Qual Life Res. 23(4):1395–1405.
24.
JohnMTKoepsellTDHujoelPMigliorettiDLLeRescheLMicheelisW.2004. Demographic factors, denture status and oral health–related quality of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 32(2):125–132.
25.
KannoTCarlssonGE. 2006. A review of the shortened dental arch concept focusing on the work by the Kayser/Nijmegen group. J Oral Rehabil. 33(11):850–862.
26.
KhanSMusekiwaAChikteUMOmarR.2014. Differences in functional outcomes for adult patients with prosthodontically-treated and -untreated shortened dental arches: a systematic review. PLoS One. 9(7):e101143.
27.
KordunerEKSoderfeldtBKronstromMNilnerK.2006. Attitudes toward the shortened dental arch concept among Swedish general dental practitioners. Int J Prosthodont. 19(2):171–176.
28.
LahtiSSuominen-TaipaleLHausenH.2008. Oral health impacts among adults in Finland: competing effects of age, number of teeth, and removable dentures. Eur J Oral Sci. 116(3):260–266.
29.
LeaoASheihamA.1995. Relation between clinical dental status and subjective impacts on daily living. J Dent Res. 74(7):1408–1413.
30.
LockerD. 1988. Measuring oral health: a conceptual framework. Community Dent Health. 5(1):3–18.
31.
LockerDJokovicAClarkeM.2004. Assessing the responsiveness of measures of oral health–related quality of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 32(1):10–18.
32.
McGrathCBediR.2004. Why are we “weighting”? An assessment of a self-weighting approach to measuring oral health–related quality of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 32(1):19–24.
33.
McKennaGAllenFWoodsNO’MahonyDCroninMDaMataCNormandC.2014. Cost-effectiveness of tooth replacement strategies for partially dentate elderly: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 42(4):366–374.
34.
MesasAEde AndradeSMCabreraMA. 2008. Factors associated with negative self-perception of oral health among elderly people in a Brazilian community. Gerodontology. 25(1):49–56.
35.
MordohaiNReshadMJivrajSA. 2005. To extract or not to extract? Factors that affect individual tooth prognosis. J Calif Dent Assoc. 33(4):319–28.
36.
Nowjack-RaymerRESheihamA.2007. Numbers of natural teeth, diet, and nutritional status in US adults. J Dent Res. 86(12):1171–5.
37.
OstbergALNyholmMGullbergBRastamLLindbladU.2009. Tooth loss and obesity in a defined Swedish population. Scand J Public Health. 37(4):427–433.
38.
PallegedaraCEkanayakeL.2008. Effect of tooth loss and denture status on oral health–related quality of life of older individuals from Sri Lanka. Community Dent Health. 25(4):196–200.
39.
PereraREkanayakeL.2011. Number of natural teeth and oral impacts: a study on Sri Lankan adults. Int J Dent. 2011:809620.
40.
PereraREkanayakeL.2012. Oral impacts and their association with tooth loss in Sri Lankan adults. Community Dent Health. 29(3):214–218.
41.
PetersenPEKjøllerMChristensenLBKrustrupU.2004. Changing dentate status of adults, use of dental health services, and achievement of national dental health goals in Denmark by the year 2000. J Public Health Dent. 64(3):127–35.
42.
PetersenPEYamamotoT.2005. Improving the oral health of older people: the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 33(2):81–92.
43.
ShimazakiYSohISaitoTYamashitaYKogaTMiyazakiHTakeharaT.2001. Influence of dentition status on physical disability, mental impairment, and mortality in institutionalized elderly people. J Dent Res. 80(1):340–345.
44.
SischoLBroderHL. 2011. Oral health–related quality of life: what, why, how, and future implications. J Dent Res. 90(11):1264–1270.
45.
SladeGDSandersAE. 2011. The paradox of better subjective oral health in older age. J Dent Res. 90(11):1279–1285.
46.
SladeGDSpencerAJ. 1994. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health. 11(1):3–11.
47.
SladeGDSpencerAJRoberts-ThomsonKF. 2007. Australia’s dental generations: the National Survey of Adult Oral Health 2004–06. Canberra (Australia): Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. AIHW Catalog No. DEN 165.
48.
SomsakKKaewplungO.2014. The effects of the number of natural teeth and posterior occluding pairs on the oral health–related quality of life in elderly dental patients. Gerodontology [epub ahead of print 6 Mar 2014].
49.
SteeleJGSandersAESladeGDAllenPFLahtiSNuttallNSpencerAJ. 2004. How do age and tooth loss affect oral health impacts and quality of life? A study comparing two national samples. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 32(2):107–114.
50.
SwobodaJKiyakHAPerssonREPerssonGRYamaguchiDKMacEnteeMIWyattCC. 2006. Predictors of oral health quality of life in older adults. Spec Care Dentist. 26(4):137–144.
51.
TanHPeresKGPeresMA. 2015. Do people with shortened dental arches have worse oral health–related quality of life than those with more natural teeth? A population-based study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 43(1):33–46.
52.
TsakosGAllenPFSteeleJGLockerD.2012. Interpreting oral health–related quality of life data. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 40(3):193–200.
53.
TsakosGMarcenesWSheihamA.2004. The relationship between clinical dental status and oral impacts in an elderly population. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2(3):211–220.
54.
TsakosGSteeleJGMarcenesWWallsAWSheihamA.2006. Clinical correlates of oral health–related quality of life: evidence from a national sample of British older people. Eur J Oral Sci. 114(5):391–395.
55.
WalterMHWoronukJITanHKLenzUKochRBoeningKWPinchbeckYJ. 2007. Oral health related quality of life and its association with sociodemographic and clinical findings in 3 northern outreach clinics. J Can Dent Assoc. 73(2):153.
56.
WitterDJvan Palenstein HeldermanWHCreugersNHKayserAF. 1999. The shortened dental arch concept and its implications for oral health care. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 27(4):249–258.
57.
WolfartSMullerFGerssJHeyedckeGMarreBBoningKWöstmannBKernMMundtTHannakW. 2014. The randomized shortened dental arch study: oral health–related quality of life. Clin Oral Investig. 18(2):525–533.
58.
ZengXSheihamABernabeETsakosG.2010. Relationship between dental status and Oral Impacts on Daily Performances in older Southern Chinese people. J Public Health Dent. 70(2):101–107.
59.
ZhangQWitterDJGerritsenAEBronkhorstEMCreugersNH. 2013. Functional dental status and oral health–related quality of life in an over 40 years old Chinese population. Clin Oral Investig. 17(6):1471–1480.
60.
ZhaoLLinHCLoECWongMC. 2011. Clinical and socio-demographic factors influencing the oral health–related quality of life of Chinese elders. Community Dent Health. 28(3):206–210.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
