BernardoMLuisHMartinMDLerouxBGRueTLeitãoJDeRouenTA. 2007. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 138(6):775–783.
2.
Estupiñán-DaySMilnerTTellezM.2006. Oral health of low income children: procedures for atraumatic restorative treatment (PRAT): final report. Washington (DC): Pan American Health Organization.
3.
Estupiñán-DaySTellezMKaurSMilnerTSolariA.2013. Managing dental caries with atraumatic restorative treatment in children: successful experience in three Latin American countries. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 33(4):237–243.
4.
FrenckenJETaifourDvan’t HofMA. 2006. Survival of ART and amalgam restorations in permanent teeth of children after 6.3 years. J Dent Res. 85(7):622–626.
5.
MolinaGFFaulksDMazzolaIMulderJFrenckenJE. 2014. One year survival of ART and conventional restorations in patients with disability. BMC Oral Health. 14:49.
SonciniJAMaserejianNNTrachtenbergFTavaresMHayesC.2007. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings from the New England Children’s Amalgam Trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 138(6):763–772.
