Innovations in Materials for Direct Restorations

ADA (2007). Best management practices for amalgam waste. URL accessed 9/3/2013 at: http://www.ada.org/sections/publicResources/pdfs/topics_amalgamwaste.pdf.

Bayne SC (2012). Correlation of clinical performance with ‘in vitro tests’ of restorative dental materials that use polymer-based matrices. Dent Mater 28:52-71.

Bayne SC Petersen PE Piper D Schmalz G Meyer D (2013). The challenge for innovation in direct restorative materials. Adv Dent Res 25:8-17.

Dhima M Paulusova V Lohse C Salinas TJ Carr AB (2013). Practice-based evidence from 29-year outcome analysis of management of the edentulous jaw using osseointegrated dental implants. J Prosthodont [Epub ahead of print 7/26/2013] (in press).

Ferracane J Fisher J Eiselé JL Fox CH (2013). Ensuring the global availability of high-quality dental restoratives. Adv Dent Res 25:41-45.

Hamilton DF Lane JV Gaston P Patton JT Macdonald D Simpson AH . (2013). What determines patient satisfaction with surgery? A prospective cohort study of 4709 patients following total joint replacement. BMJ Open 3(4).pii: e002525.

IADR (2013). Minamata Convention on Mercury Includes Call for Dental Research [press release]. IADR, Alexandria, VA, USA. URL accessed 9/3/2013 at: http://www.iadr.org/files/public/13UNEP_MinamataConvention.pdf.

Ko YL Wu HF Lin PC (2013). A survey of patients’ quality of life and health-care needs prior to undergoing total joint replacement surgery. Int J Nurs Pract 19:415-422.

Malvankar SM Khan WS (2012). An overview of the different approaches used in the development of meniscal tissue engineering. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 7:157-163.

Marques E Noble S Blom AW Hollingworth W (2013). Disclosing total waiting times for joint replacement: evidence from the English NHS using linked HES data. Health Econ [Epub ahead of print 7/20/2013] (in press).

O’Keefe RJ Mao J (2011). Bone tissue engineering and regeneration: from discovery to the clinic—an overview. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 17:389-392.

Petersen PE (2009). Future use of materials for dental restoration. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.

Pitts NB Drummond J Guggenberger R Ferrillo P Johnson S (2013). Incorporating new materials and techniques into clinical practice. Adv Dent Res 25:33-40.

Rekow ED Bayne SC Carvalho RM Steele JG (2013). What constitutes an ideal dental restorative material? Adv Dent Res 25:18-23.

Soler JI Ellacuria J Triana R Guinea E Osborne JW (2002). A history of dental amalgam. J Hist Dent 50:109-116.

Thompson VP Watson TF Marshall GW Blackman BRK Stansbury JW Schadler LS . (2013). Outside-the-(cavity-prep)-box thinking. Adv Dent Res 25:24-32.

UNEP (2013). Report of the intergovernmental negotiating committee to prepare a globally legally binding instrument on mercury on the work of its fifth session. [January 13-18, 2013. An advance copy (English only) of the text of the treaty, as formally approved by the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee at its 5^th session, is attached as an annex to the report of that negotiating session.] URL accessed on 9/3/2013 at: http://www.iisd.ca/mercury/inc5/.

Vogel R Smith-Palmer J Valentine W (2013). Evaluating the health economic implications and cost-effectiveness of dental implants: a literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28:343-356.

World Health Organization (2011). WHO Global Oral Health Data Bank. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.