The aim of this study was to investigate bone response to bioactive fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) implants under two polymerization conditions. Glass-fiber-dimethacrylate composite was tested as prepolymerized cylinder-shaped FRC implants and as cylindrical FRC implants polymerized in situ with blue light transmitted and scattered by the glass fibers. Ten FRC implants (6 prepolymerized and 4 in situ-polymerized implants) were placed in the right tibias of 3 pigs by means of a press-fit technique. After 12 weeks, light microscopy revealed only mild foreign-body reaction, with no accumulation of inflammatory cells on both the prepolymerized and the in situ-polymerized implants. The prepolymerized implants appeared to be fully integrated, whereas the in situ-polymerized implants were almost completely surrounded by a fibrous capsule. The present study suggests that in situ polymerization of FRC implants results in fibrous capsule formation and prevents integration with bone.
AlbrektssonTBrånemarkPIHanssonHALindströmJ (1981). Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a longlasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand52:155-170.
2.
AndreassenGSHoinessPRSkraammIGranlundOEngebretsen (2004). Use of a synthetic bone void filler to augment screws in osteopenic ankle fracture fixation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg124:161-165.
3.
BalloAMLassilaLVVallittuPKNärhiTO (2007). Load bearing capacity of bone anchored fiber-reinforced composite device. J Mater Sci Mater Med18:2025-2031.
4.
BalloAMLassilaLVNärhiTOVallittuPK (2008a). In vitro mechanical testing of glass fiber-reinforced composite as dental implants. J Contemp Dent Pract9:41-48.
5.
BalloAMKokkariAKMeretojaVVLassilaLLVallittuPKNärhiTO (2008b). Osteoblast proliferation and maturation on bioactive fiber-reinforced composite surface. J Mater Sci Mater Med19:3169-3177.
6.
BalloAMAkcaEAOzenTLassilaLVallittuPKNärhiTO (2009). Bone tissue responses to glass fiber-reinforced composite implants – a histomorphometric study. Clin Oral Implants Res20:608-615.
7.
BrånemarkPI (1985). Introduction to osseointegration. In: Tissue integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. BrånemarkPIZarbGAAlbrektssonT, editors. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing, pp. 11-76.
8.
BrånemarkPIHanssonBOAdellRBreineULindströmJHallénO. (1977). Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10 year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr SurgSuppl 16:1-132.
9.
BrownBHNeffPATylendaA (1969). Acrylic resin tooth implants in rhesus monkeys: a preliminary report. J Prosthet Dent22:367-370.
10.
ChehroudiBRatkayJBrunetteDM (1992). The role of implant surface geometry on mineralization in vitro and in vivo: a transmission and electronmicroscopic study. Cells Mater2:89-104.
11.
CochranDLSchenkRKLussiAHigginbottomFLBuserD (1998). Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res40:1-11.
12.
CooperLFMasudaTYliheikkiläPKFeltonDA (1998). Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part 2: in vitro studies. J Oral Maxillofac Implants13:163-174.
13.
EhrlichJAzazB (1975). Immediate implantation of acrylic resin teeth into human tooth sockets. J Prosthet Dent33:205-209.
14.
EvansSLHuntCMAhujaS (2002). Bone cement or bone substitute augmentation of pedicle screws improves pullout strength in posterior spinal fixation. J Mater Sci Mater Med13:1143-1145.
15.
HenchLLEthridgeEC, editors (1982). Biomaterials: an interfacial approach. New York: Academic Press.
16.
HodoshMPovarMShklarG (1969). The dental polymer implant concept. J Prosthet Dent22:371-380.
17.
HodoshMPovarMShklarG (1970). Control of porosity in polymer tooth implants. J Prosthet Dent24:453-460.
18.
HodoshMPovarMShklarG (1973). Development of the self supporting polymer tooth implant. J Biomed Mater Res7:205-216.
19.
HulbertSFLevineSNMoyleDD, editors (1973). Prostheses and tissue: the interface problem. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
20.
LastumäkiTMKallioTTVallittuPK (2002). The bond strength of light-curing composite resin to finally polymerized and aged glass fiber-reinforced composite substrate. Biomaterials23:4533-4539.
21.
Le BellAMTannerJLassilaLVKangasniemiIVallittuPK (2003). Depth of light initiated polymerization of glass fiber reinforced composite in a simulated root canal. Int J Prosthodont16:403-408.
22.
LehtinenJLaurilaTLassilaLVVallituPKRätyJHernbergR (2008). Optical characterization of bisphenol-A-glycidyldimethacrylate-triethyleneglycoldimethacrylate (BisGMA/TEGDMA) monomers and copolymer. Dent Mater24:1324-1328.
23.
LinderL (1989). Osseointegration of metallic implants. I. Light microscopy in the rabbit. Acta Orthop Scand60:129-134.
24.
PalussiereJBergeJGangiACottenAPascoABertagnoliR. (2005). Clinical results of an open prospective study of a bis-GMA composite in percutaneous vertebral augmentation. Eur Spine J14:982-991.
25.
TuusaSMPuskaMALassilaLVVallittuPK (2005). Residual monomers released from glass fibre-reinforced composite photopolymerised in contact with bone and blood. J Mater Sci Mater Med16:15-20.
26.
TuusaSMPeltolaMJTirriTLassilaLVVallittuPK (2007). Frontal bone defect repair with experimental glass-fiber-reinforced composite with bioactive glass granule coating. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater82:149-155.
27.
WatzekGHaiderRMensdorff-PouillyNHaasR (1995). Immediate and delayed implantation for complete restoration of the jaw following extraction of all residual teeth: a retrospective study comparing different types of serial immediate implantation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants10:561-567.
28.
WeissCM (1986). Tissue integration of dental endosseous implants: description and comparative analysis of the fibro-osseous integration and osseous integration systems. J Oral Implantol12:169-214.
29.
ZhaoDSMoritzNLaurilaPMattilaRLassilaLVStrandbergN. (2009). Development of a biomechanically optimized multi-component fiber-reinforced composite implant for load-sharing conditions. Med Eng Phys31:461-469.
