Disparity between Dental Needs and Dental Treatment Provided

Abstract

We hypothesized that more teeth would be treated by fee-for-service dentists than predicted by salaried dentists. In a cohort of 3818 participants, the number of teeth treated was related to the number of teeth with treatment needs by means of a zero-inflated negative binomial model. Among those obtaining dental care within 6 months (study population, n = 1239), the adjusted predicted number of teeth treated was 2 (95%CI = 1.7;2.3) for patients with no treatment needs. The sum of teeth treated by fee-for-service dentists (4374 when considering the whole cohort and 3550 when considering the study population) was much higher than that predicted by salaried dentists (4220 when considering the whole cohort and 1770 when considering the study population). Our findings demonstrate a disparity between dental needs assessment and the dental treatment actually provided.

Keywords

over-treatment fee-for-service needs assessment dental care

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Atchison

Schoen

(1990). A comparison of quality in a dual-choice dental plan: capitation versus fee-for-service. J Public Health Dent 50:186-193.

Birch

(1988). The identification of supplier-inducement in a fixed price system of health care provision. The case of dentistry in the United Kingdom. J Health Econ 7:129-150.

Elderton

(1993). Overtreatment with restorative dentistry: when to intervene? Int Dent J 43:17-24.

Gosden

Forland

Kristiansen

Sutton

Leese

Giuffrida

. (2005). Capitation, salary, fee-for-service, and mixed systems of payment: effects on the behaviour of primary care physicians. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000 3:CD002215.

Grytten

(1992). Supplier inducement—its relative effect on demand and utilization. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 20:6-9.

Hartshorne

Hasegawa

(2003). Overservicing in dental practice—ethical perspectives. S Afr Dent J 58:364-369.

Long

Freese

(2005). Regression model for categorical dependent variables using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.

Nuttall

(1983). Capability of a national epidemiological survey to predict General Dental Service treatment. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 11:296-301.

Nuttall

Pitts

(1990). Restorative treatment thresholds reported to be used by dentists in Scotland. Br Dent J 169:119-126.

10.

Porter

Coyte

Barnsley

Croxford

(1999). The effects of fee bundling on dental utilization. Health Serv Res 34:901-921.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.39 MB