Tooth enamel is the hardest tissue in the human body and is directly responsible for dental function. Due to its non-regenerative nature, enamel is unable to heal and repair itself biologically after damage. We hypothesized that with its unique microstructure, enamel possesses excellent resistance to contact-induced damage, regardless of loading direction. By combining instrumented indentation tests with microstructural analysis, we report that enamel can absorb indentation energy through shear deformation within its protein layers between apatite crystallites. Moreover, a near-isotropic inelastic response was observed when we analyzed indentation data in directions either perpendicular or parallel to the path of enamel prisms. An “effective” crystal orientation angle, 33°–34°, was derived for enamel microstructure, independent of the loading direction. These findings will help guide the design of the nanostructural architecture of dental restorative materials.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baldassarri M, Margolis HC, Beniash E -2008-. Compositional determinants of mechanical properties of enamel. J Dent Res87:645–649.
2.
Chen H, Tang Z, Liu J, Sun K, Chang SR, Peters MC, et al. -2006-. Acellular synthesis of a human enamel-like microstructure. Advanced Mater18:1846–1851.
3.
Daculsi G, Mentanteau J, Kerebel LM, Mitre D -1984-. Length and shape of enamel crystals. Calcif Tissue Int36:550–555.
4.
Fan Y, Sun Z, Wang RZ, Abbott C, Moradian-Oldak J -2007-. Enamel inspired nanocomposite fabrication through amelogenin supramolecular assembly. Biomaterials28:3034–3042.
5.
Fantner GE, Hassenkam T, Kindt JS, Weaver JC, Birkedal H, Pechenik L, et al. -2005-. Sacrificial bonds and hidden length dissipate energy as mineralized fibrils separate during bone fracture. Nat Mater4:612–616.
6.
Hacker CH, Wagner WC, Razzoog ME -1996-. An in vitro investigation of the wear of enamel on porcelain and gold in saliva. J Prosthet Dent75:14–17.
7.
Hayasaki H, Okamoto A, Iwase Y, Yamasaki Y, Nakata M -2004-. Occlusal contact area of mandibular teeth during lateral excursion. Int J Prosthodont17:72–76.
8.
He LH, Swain MV -2007a-. Contact induced deformation of enamel. Appl Phys Lett90:171916.
He LH, Swain MV -2007c-. Nanoindentation derived stress-strain properties of dental materials. Dent Mater23:814–821.
11.
He LH, Fujisawa N, Swain MV -2006-. Elastic modulus and stress-strain response of human enamel by nanoindentation. Biomaterials27:4388–4398.
12.
Hudson JD, Goldstein GR, Georgescu M -1995-. Enamel wear caused by three different restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent74:647–654.
13.
Imbeni V, Kruzic JJ, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ, Ritchie RO -2005-. The dentin-enamel junction and the fracture of human teeth. Nat Mater4:229–232.
14.
Jones RM -1999-. Mechanics of composite materials, 2nd edition, Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis, Inc., pp. 74–85.
15.
Liu B, Zhang LX, Gao HJ -2006-. Poisson ratio can play a crucial role in mechanical properties of biocomposites. Mechanics of Materials38:1128–1142.
16.
Nanci A -2003-. Ten Cate’s oral histology: development, structure, and function. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Inc. -Elsevier Health Sciences-.
17.
Ramp MH, Suzuki S, Cox CF, Lacefield WR, Koth DL -1997-. Evaluation of wear: enamel opposing three ceramic materials and a gold alloy. J Prosthet Dent77:523–530.
18.
Schneider GA, He LH, Swain MV -2008-. Viscous flow model of creep in enamel. J Appl Phys103:014701.
19.
Shimizu D, Macho GA, Spears IR -2005-. The effect of prism orientation and loading direction on contact stresses in prismatic enamel: implications for interpreting wear patterns. Am J Phys Anthropol126:427–434.
20.
Spears IR -1997-. A three-dimensional finite element model of prismatic enamel: a re-appraisal of the data on the Young’s modulus of enamel. J Dent Res76:1690–1697.
21.
Staines M, Robinson WH, Hood JAA -1981-. Spherical indentation of tooth enamel. J Mater Sci16:2551–2556.
22.
Termine JD, Torchia DA, Conn KM -1979-. Enamel matrix: structural proteins. J Dent Res58-Spec Iss B-:773–781.
23.
Thompson JB, Kindt JH, Drake B, Hansma HG, Morse DE, Hansma PK -2001-. Bone indentation recovery time correlates with bond reforming time. Nature414:773–776.
24.
Waltimo A, Könönen M -1995-. Maximal bite force and its associations with signs and symptoms of craniomandibular disorders in young Finnish non-patients. Acta Odontol Scand53:254–258.
25.
White SN, Luo W, Paine ML, Fong H, Sarikaya M, Snead ML -2001-. Biological organization of hydroxyapatite crystallites into a fibrous continuum toughens and controls anisotropy in human enamel. J Dent Res80:321–326.
26.
Xie Z, Kilpatrick NM, Swain MV, Munroe P, Hoffman M -2008a-. Transmission electron microscope characterisation of molar-incisor-hypomineralisation. J Mater Sci: Mater Med19:3187–3192.
27.
Xie Z, Swain M, Munroe P, Hoffman M -2008b-. On the critical parameters that regulate the mechanical behaviour of tooth enamel. Biomaterials29:2697–2703.
28.
Xie ZH, Hoffman M, Munroe P, Bendavid A, Martin P -2008c-. Deformation mechanisms of TiN multilayer coatings alternated by ductile or stiff interlayers. Acta Mater56:852–861.
29.
Xu HHK, Smith DT, Jahanmir S, Romberg E, Kelly JR, Thompson VP, et al. -1998-. Indentation damage and mechanical properties of human enamel and dentin. J Dent Res77:472–480.
30.
Yamagishi K, Onuma K, Suzuki T, Okada F, Tagami J, Otsuki M, et al. -2005-. A synthetic enamel for rapid tooth repair. Nature433:819.
31.
Zhou J, Hsiung LL -2006-. Biomolecular origin of the rate-dependent deformation of prismatic enamel. Appl Phys Lett89:051904.
