Mandibular condylar cartilage functions as the load-bearing, shock-absorbing, lubricating material in temporomandibular joints. Little is known about the precise nature of the biomechanical characteristics of this fibro-cartilaginous tissue. We hypothesized that the fixed charge density associated with proteoglycans that introduces an osmotic pressure inside condylar cartilage will significantly increase the tissue’s apparent stiffness. Micro-indentation creep tests were performed on porcine TMJ condylar cartilage at 5 different regions—anterior, posterior, medial, lateral, and central—in physiologic and hypertonic solutions. The intrinsic and apparent mechanical properties, including aggregate modulus, shear modulus, and permeability, were calculated by indentation test data and the biphasic theory. The apparent properties (with osmotic effect) were statistically higher than those of the intrinsic solid matrix (without osmotic effect). Regional variations in fixed charge density, permeability, and mechanical modulus were also calculated for condylar surface. The present results provide important quantitative data on the biomechanical properties of TMJ condylar cartilage.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ateshian GA, Chahine NO, Basalo IM, Hung CT (2004). The correspondence between equilibrium biphasic and triphasic material properties in mixture models of articular cartilage. J Biomech37:391–400.
2.
Athanasiou KA, Rosenwasser MP, Buckwalter JA, Malinin TI, Mow VC (1991). Interspecies comparisons of in situ intrinsic mechanical properties of distal femoral cartilage. J Orthop Res9:330–340.
3.
Bae WC, Lewis CW, Levenston ME, Sah RL (2006). Indentation testing of human articular cartilage: effects of probe tip geometry and indentation depth on intra-tissue strain. J Biomech39:1039–1047.
4.
Bermejo A, Gonzalez O, Gonzalez JM (1993). The pig as an animal model for experimentation on the temporomandibular articular complex. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol75:18–23.
5.
Burrows AM, Smith TD (2007). Histomorphology of the mandibular condylar cartilage in greater galagos (Otolemur spp.). Am J Primatol69:36–45.
6.
Chahine NO, Chen FH, Hung CT, Ateshian GA (2005). Direct measurement of osmotic pressure of glycosaminoglycan solutions by membrane osmometry at room temperature. Biophys J89:1543–1550.
7.
Donnan FG (1924). The theory of membrane equilibria. Chemical Reviews1(1):73–90.
8.
Ehrlich S, Wolff N, Schneiderman R, Maroudas A, Parker KH, Winlove CP (1998). The osmotic pressure of chondroitin sulphate solutions: experimental measurements and theoretical analysis. Biorheology35:383–397.
9.
Flahiff CM, Narmoneva DA, Huebner JL, Kraus VB, Guilak F, Setton LA (2002). Osmotic loading to determine the intrinsic material properties of guinea pig knee cartilage. J Biomech35:1285–1290.
10.
Gu WY, Lai WM, Mow VC (1998). A mixture theory for charged-hydrated soft tissues containing multi-electrolytes: passive transport and swelling behaviors. J Biomech Eng120:169–180.
Hoch DH, Grodzinsky AJ, Koob TJ, Albert ML, Eyre DR (1983). Early changes in material properties of rabbit articular cartilage after meniscectomy. J Orthop Res1:4–12.
13.
Hu K, Radhakrishnan P, Patel RV, Mao JJ (2001). Regional structural and viscoelastic properties of fibrocartilage upon dynamic nanoindentation of the articular condyle. J Struct Biol136:46–52.
14.
Hu K, Qiguo R, Fang J, Mao JJ (2003). Effects of condylar fibrocartilage on the biomechanical loading of the human temporomandibular joint in a three-dimensional, nonlinear finite element model. Med Eng Phys25:107–113.
15.
Huang CY, Mow VC, Ateshian GA (2001). The role of flow-independent viscoelasticity in the biphasic tensile and compressive responses of articular cartilage. J Biomech Eng123:410–417.
16.
Kim KW, Wong ME, Helfrick JF, Thomas JB, Athanasiou KA (2003). Biomechanical tissue characterization of the superior joint space of the porcine temporomandibular joint. Ann Biomed Eng31:924–930.
17.
Korhonen RK, Wong M, Arokoski J, Lindgren R, Helminen HJ, Hunziker EB, et al. (2002). Importance of the superficial tissue layer for the indentation stiffness of articular cartilage. Med Eng Phys24:99–108.
18.
Kuboki T, Shinoda M, Orsini MG, Yamashita A (1997). Viscoelastic properties of the pig temporomandibular joint articular soft tissues of the condyle and disc. J Dent Res76:1760–1769.
19.
Lai WM, Hou JS, Mow VC (1991). A triphasic theory for the swelling and deformation behaviors of articular cartilage. J Biomech Eng113: 245–258.
20.
Lu XL, Sun DD, Guo XE, Chen FH, Lai WM, Mow VC (2004). Indentation determined mechanoelectrochemical properties and fixed charge density of articular cartilage. Ann Biomed Eng32:370–379.
21.
Lu XL, Miller C, Chen FH, Guo XE, Mow VC (2007). The generalized triphasic correspondence principle for simultaneous determination of the mechanical properties and proteoglycan content of articular cartilage by indentation. J Biomech40:2434–2441.
22.
Maroudas A (1979). Physicochemical properties of articular cartilage. In: Adult articular cartilage. Freeman MAR, editor. Kent, UK: Pitman Medical, pp. 215–290.
23.
Maroudas A, Bullough P, Swanson SA, Freeman MA (1968). The permeability of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Br50:166–177.
24.
Mow VC, Kuei SC, Lai WM, Armstrong CG (1980). Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression? Theory and experiments. J Biomech Eng102:73–84.
25.
Mow VC, Gibbs MC, Lai WM, Zhu WB, Athanasiou KA (1989). Biphasic indentation of articular cartilage—II. A numerical algorithm and an experimental study. J Biomech22:853–861.
26.
Mow VC, Ateshian GA, Lai WM, Gu WY (1998). Effects of fixed charges on the stress-relaxation behavior of hydrated soft tissues in a confined compression problem. Int J Solids Struct35:4945–4962.
27.
Mow VC, Gu WY, Chen FH (2005). Structure and function of articular cartilage and meniscus. In: Basic orthopaedic biomechanics and mechano-biology. 3rd ed. Mow VC, Huiskes R, editors. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp. 181–258.
28.
Nicodemus GD, Villanueva I, Bryant SJ (2007). Mechanical stimulation of TMJ condylar chondrocytes encapsulated in PEG hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res A83:323–331.
29.
Tanaka E, Aoyama J, Tanaka M, Van Eijden T, Sugiyama M, Hanaoka K, et al. (2003). The proteoglycan contents of the temporomandibular joint disc influence its dynamic viscoelastic properties. J Biomed Mater Res A65:386–392.
30.
Tanaka E, Yamano E, Dalla-Bona DA, Watanabe M, Inubushi T, Shirakura M, et al. (2006). Dynamic compressive properties of the mandibular condylar cartilage. J Dent Res85:571–575.
31.
Wan LQ, Miller C, Guo XE, Mow VC (2004). Fixed electrical charges and mobile ions affect the measurable mechano-electrochemial properties of charged-hydrated biological tissues: the articular cartilage paradigm. Mech Chem Biosyst1:81–99.
