While the movability of the human temporomandibular joint is great, the strains and stresses in the cartilaginous structures might largely depend on the position of the mandible with respect to the skull. This hypothesis was investigated by means of static three-dimensional finite element simulations involving different habitual condylar positions. Furthermore, the influence of several model parameters was examined by sensitivity analyses. The results indicated that the disc moved together with the condyle in the anterior direction without the presence of ligaments and the lateral pterygoid muscle. By adapting its shape to the changing geometry of the articular surfaces, the disc prevented small contact areas and thus local peak loading. In a jaw-closed configuration, the influence of 30° variations of the loading direction was negligible. The load distribution capability of the disc appeared to be proportional to its elasticity and was enhanced by the fibrocartilage layers on the articular surfaces.
Beek M., Koolstra JH, Van Ruijven LJ, Van Eijden Tmgj (2000). Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the human temporomandibular joint disc. J Biomechan33:307-316.
2.
Beek M., Aarnts MP, Koolstra JH, Feilzer AJ, Van Eijden Tmgj (2001). Dynamical properties of the human temporomandibular joint disc. J Dent Res80:876-880.
3.
Chen J., Xu L. (1994). A finite element analysis of the human temporomandibular joint. J Biomech Eng116:401-407.
4.
Chen J., Akyuz U., Xu L., Pidaparti Rmv (1998). Stress analysis of the human temporomandibular joint. Med Eng Phys20:565-572.
5.
Chin Lpy, Aker FD, Zarrina K. (1996). The viscoelastic properties of the human temporomandibular joint disc. J Oral Maxillofac Surg54:315-318.
6.
DeVocht JW, Goel VK, Zeitler DL, Lew D. (1996). A study of the control of disc movement within the temporomandibular joint using the finite element technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg54:1431-1437.
7.
Hansson T., Oberg T., Carlsson GE, Kopp S. ( 1997). Thickness of the soft tissue layers and the articular disc in the temporomandibular joint. Acta Odontol Scand35:77-83.
8.
Huiskes R., Chao Eys (1983). A survey of finite element analysis in orthopedic biomechanics: the first decade. J Biomechan16:385-409.
9.
Koolstra JH, Van Eijden Tmgj (1992). Application and validation of a three-dimensional mathematical model of the human masticatory system in vivo. J Biomechan25:175-187.
10.
Korioth Twp, Versluis A. (1997). Modeling the mechanical behavior of the jaws and their related structures by finite element (FE) analysis. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med8:90-104.
11.
Korioth Twp, Romilly DP, Hannam AG (1992). Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of the dentate human mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol88:69-96.
12.
Kovach IS (1996). A molecular theory of cartilage viscoelasticity . Biophys Chem59:61-73.
13.
Lai WF, Bowley J., Burch JG (1998). Evaluation of shear stress of the human temporomandibular joint disc. J Orofac Pain12:153-159.
14.
Marc (1996). Volume A: theory and user information. Version K6. Palo Alto, CA, USA: MARC Analysis Research Corporation.
15.
McCormack T., Mansour JM (1998). Reduction in tensile strength of cartilage precedes surface damage under repeated compressive loading in vitro. J Biomechan31:55-61.
16.
Mow VC, Ateshian GA, Spilker RL (1993). Biomechanics of diarthrodial joints: a review of twenty years of progress. J Biomech Eng115:460-467.
17.
Nagahara K., Murata S., Nakamura S., Tsuchiya T. (1999). Displacement and stress distribution in the temporomandibular joint during clenching. Angle Orthod69:372-379.
18.
Newberry WN, Mackenzie CD, Haut RC ( 1998). Blunt impact causes changes in bone and cartilage in a regularly exercised animal model. J Orthop Res16:348-354.
19.
Nickel JC, McLachlan KR (1994). In vitro measurement of the frictional properties of the temporomandibular joint disc. Arch Oral Biol39:323-331.
20.
Schreppers Gjma, Sauren Aahj, Huson A. (1990). A numerical model of the load transmission in the tibio-femoral contact area. Proc Inst Mech Eng H-J Eng Med204:53-59.
21.
Soltz MA, Ateshian GA (1998). Experimental verification and theoretical prediction of cartilage interstitial fluid pressurization at an impermeable contact interface in confined compression. J Biomechan31:927-934.
22.
Tanaka E., Tanne K., Sakuda M. (1994). A three-dimensional finite element model of the mandible including the TMJ and its application to stress analysis in the TMJ during clenching. Med Eng Phys16:316-322.
23.
Tanaka E., Tanne M., Miyawaki Y., Tanne K. (1999). Viscoelastic properties of canine temporomandibular joint disc in compressive load-relaxation. Arch Oral Biol44:1021-1026.
24.
Van Eijden Tmgj (2000). Biomechanics of the mandible. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med11:123-136.
25.
Van Ruijven LJ, Beek M., Van Eijden Tmgj (1999). Fitting parametrized polynomials with scattered surface data. J Biomechan32:715-720.
26.
Van Ruijven LJ, Beek M., Donker E., Van Eijden Tmgj (2000). The accuracy of joint surface models constructed from data obtained with an electromagnetic tracking device. J Biomechan33 :1023-1028.
27.
Werner JA, Tillmann B., Schleicher A. (1991). Functional anatomy of the temporomandibular joint. A morphologic study on human autopsy material. Anat Embryol183:89-95.
