Biomechanical and biological factors can co-dependently influence the establishment of implant-tissue integration; thus, concurrent evaluation of these factors should provide a better understanding of osseointegration. This study aimed to establish and validate an in vivo rat model frequently used in molecular/cellular biology for implant biomechanical studies. We tested the hypotheses that the implant push-in test assesses the degree of osseointegration by the breakpoint load at the implant-tissue interface and that it sensitively differentiates between the effects of different implant surface topographies. The implant push-in test, which produces a consistent load-displacement measurement, was used to test miniature cylindrical titanium implants placed at the distal edge of the adult rat femur. The push-in test values obtained at each post-implantation healing point (weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8) significantly increased in a time-dependent manner. The implant surface after the push-in test was associated with remnant tissues containing host-derived elements, such as calcium, phosphate, and sulfate. In this model, acid-etched implants (average roughness, 0.159 μm) showed significantly greater push-in test values than did turned implants (average roughness, 0.063 μm) throughout the experimental period (p < 0.0001). These results support the validity of the push-in test in rats, which may be used as a rapid and sensitive biomechanical assay system for implant osseointegration research.
Albrektsson T., Hannson HA, Ivarsson B. (1985). Interface analysis of titanium and zirconium bone implants. Biomaterials6:97-101.
2.
Baker D., London RM, O'Neal R. (1999). Rate of pull-out strength gain of dual-etched titanium implants: a comparative study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants14:722-728.
3.
Boyan BD, Lincks J., Lohmann CH, Sylvia VL, Cochran DL, Blanchard CR, et al. (1999). Effect of surface roughness and composition on costochondral chondrocytes is dependent on cell maturation state. J Orthoped Res17:446-457.
4.
Branemark P., Breine U., Adell R., Hansson BO, Lindstrom J., Ohlsson A. (1969). Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg3:81-100.
5.
Branemark R., Ohrnell LO, Nilsson P., Thomsen P. (1997). Biomechanical characterization of osseointegration during healing: an experimental in vivo study in the rat. Biomaterials18:969-978.
6.
Budd TW, Nagahara K., Bielat KL, Meenaghan MA, Schaaf NG (1992). Visualization and initial characterization of the titanium boundary of the bone-implant interface of osseointegrated implants . Int J Maxillofac Implants7:151-160.
7.
Buser D., Schenk RK, Steinemann S., Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. (1991). Influence of surface characteristics on bone intergration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res25:889-902.
8.
Carlsson L., Rostlund T., Albrektsson B., Albrektsson T. (1988). Removable torques for polished and rough titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants3:21-24.
9.
Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A., Higginbottom FL, Buser D. (1997). Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a histometric study in the canine mandible. JBiomed Mater Res40:1-11.
10.
Cooper LF, Masuda T., Whitson SW, Yliheikkila P., Felton DA (1999). Formation of mineralizing osteoblast cultures on machined, titanium oxide grit-blasted, and plasma-sprayed titanium surfaces . Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants14:37-47.
11.
Davis JE, Lowenberg D., Shiga A. (1990). The bone titanium interface in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res24:1289-1306.
Fiorellini JP, Nevins ML, Norkin A., Weber HP, Karimbux NY (1999). The effect of insulin therapy on osseointegration in a diabetic rat model. Clin Oral Implants Res10:362-368.
14.
Guglielmotti MB, Renou S., Cabrini RL (1999). Evaluation of bone tissue on metallic implants by energy-dispersive x-ray analysis: an experimental study. Implant Dent8:303-309.
15.
Hazan R., Brener R., Oron U. ( 1993). Bone growth to metal implants is regulated by their surface chemical properties. Biomaterials14:570-574.
16.
Johansson CB, Albrektsson T. (1987). Integration of screw implants in the rabbit: A 1-yr follow-up of removal torque of titanium implants. Int J Oral Macillofac Implants2:69-75.
17.
Karimbux NY, Sirakian A., Weber HP, Nishimura I. (1995). A new animal model for molecular biological analysis of the implant-tissue interface: spatial expression of type XII collagen mRNA around a titanium oral implant. J Oral Implantol21:107-113.
18.
Kessel RG, Kardon RH (1979). Tissues and organs: a text-atlas of scanning electron microscopy. San Francisco: Freeman and Co.
19.
Klokkevold PR, Nishimura RD, Adachi M., Caputo A. (1997). Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. Clin Oral Implant Res8:442-447.
20.
Kraut RA, Dootson J., McCullen A. (1991). Biomechanical analysis of osseointegration of IMZ implants in goat mandibles and maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants6:187-194.
21.
LeGeros RZ, Craig RG (1993). Strategies to affect bone remodeling: osseointegration . J Bone Miner Res8(Suppl 2):S583-S596.
22.
Masuda T., Yliheikkila PK, Felton DA, Cooper LF (1998). Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. PartI. In vivo studies. Int J Oral Macillofac Implants13:17-29.
23.
Mustafa K., Lopez BS, Hultenby K., Wennerberg A., Arvidson K. (1998). Attachment and proliferation of human oral fibroblasts to titanium surfaces blasted with TiO2 particles. Clin Oral Implant Res9:195-207.
24.
Nanci A., McCarthy GF, Zalzal S., Clokie Cml, Warshawsky H., McKee MD (1994). Tissue response to titanium implants in the rat tibia: ultrastructural, immunocytochemical and lectincytochemical characterization of the bone-titanium interface. Cells and Materials4:1-30.
25.
Ohrnell LO, Branemark R., Nyman J., Nilsson P., Thomsen P. (1997). Effects of irradiation on the biomechanics of osseointegration. An experimental in vivo study in rats. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg31:281-293.
26.
Piattelli A., Manzon L., Scarano A., Paolantonio M., Piattelli M. (1998). Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of the bone response to machined and sandblasted titanium implants: an experimental study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants13:805-810.
27.
Puleo DA, Nanci A. (1999). Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface. Biomaterials20:2311-2321.
28.
Taborelli M., Jobin M., Francois P., Vaudaux P., Tonetti M., Szmukler-Moncler S., et al. (1997). Influence of surface treatments developed for oral implants on the physical and biological properties of titanium. (I) Surface characterization. Clin Oral Implants Res8:208-216.
29.
Takeshita F., Takata H., Ayukawa Y., Suetsugu T. (1997). Histomorphometric analysis of the response of rat tibiae to shape memory alloy (nitinol). Biomaterials18:21-25.
30.
Takeshita F., Murai K., Iyama S., Ayukawa Y., Suetsugu T. (1998). Uncontrolled diabetes hinders bone formation around titanium implants in rat tibiae. A light and fluorescence microscopy, and image processing study. J Periodontol69:314-320.
31.
Turner CH, Burr DB ( 1993). Basic biomechanical measurements of bone: a tutorial . Bone14:595-608.
32.
Vercaigne S., Wolke Jgc, Naert I., Jansen JA (1998). Histomorphometrical and mechanical evaluation of titanium plasma-spray-coated implants placed in the cortical bone of goats . J Biomed Mater Res41:41-48.
33.
Wennerberg A., Alberktsson T. (2000). Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants15:331-344.
34.
Wennerberg A., Alberktsson T., Lausmaa J. (1996). Torque and histomorphometric evaluation of c.p. titanium screws blasted with 25- and 75-μm-size particles of A12O3. J Biomed Mater Res30:251-260.
35.
Wong M., Eulenberger J., Schenk R., Hunzider E. (1995). Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res29:1567-1575.
