Improved Sealant Retention with Bonding Agents: A Clinical Study of Two-bottle and Single-bottle Systems

Abstract

Recent in vitro work and a short clinical study suggest that adding a bonding agent layer between sealant and saliva-contaminated enamel allows for adequate bond strength and retention of resin sealants and may improve success of all sealant applications. This five-year clinical study scored 617 occlusal and 441 buccal/lingual molar sealants, with use of a split-mouth design, with half receiving sealant alone and half bonding agent plus sealant. Treatment effects and potential risk factors for sealant failure were tested by means of a Cox regression model. Three bonding agent groups were analyzed for treatment effect: Tenure primer, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, and 3 single-bottle dentin bonding agents as a third group. The single-bottle group was successful in reducing risk of sealant failure, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.53 (p = 0.014) for occlusal and 0.35 (p = 0.006) for buccal/lingual sealants. Scotchbond was detrimental to occlusal sealant success, with a HR of 2.96 (p = 0.0003). Tenure primer was neutral, showing HRs close to 1.0. Variables that affected success differed between occlusal and buccal/lingual sealants, suggesting that failures on these two surfaces may be dependent upon differing factors. Early eruption stage was a significant risk factor for both surfaces (HR = 2.91, p = 0.00001, occlusal; and HR = 1.52, p = 0.015, buccal/lingual). Behavior (HR = 1.96, p = 0.0007), salivary problems (HR = 1.73, p = 0.002), and visually apparent variations in enamel (HR = 1.51, p = 0.018) were significant risk factors for occlusal sealants only. In addition to completing detailed analyses of risk factors for sealant survival, this study shows that single-bottle bonding agents protect sealant survival, yielding half the usual risk of failure for occlusal sealants and one-third the risk of failure for buccal/lingual sealants.

Keywords

sealant survival analysis adhesion bonding agent.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ADA Council on Access, Prevention, and Interprofessional Relations and ADA Council on Scientific Affairs (1997). Dental sealants. J Am Dent Assoc 128:485-488.

Allison PD (1995). Survival analysis using the SAS system: a practical guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.

Barrie AM , Stephen KW , Kay EJ (1990). Fissure sealant retention: a comparison of three sealant types under field conditions. Community Dent Health 7:273-277.

Borem LM , Feigal RJ (1994). Reducing microleakage of sealants under salivary contamination: digital-image analysis evaluation. Quintessence Int 25:283-289.

Brown LJ , Kaste LM , Selwitz RH , Furman LJ (1996). Dental caries and sealant usage in US children, 1988-1991: selected findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Am Dent Assoc 127:335-343.

Choi JW , Drummond JL , Dooley R. , Punwani I. , Soh JM (1997). The efficacy of primer on sealant shear bond strength . Pediatr Dent 19:286-288.

Cooney PV , Hardwick F. (1994). A fissure sealant pilot project in a third party insurance program in Manitoba. J Can Dent Assoc 60:140-141, 144-145.

Dennison JB , Straffon LH , More FG ( 1990). Evaluating tooth eruption on sealant efficacy. JAm Dent Assoc 121:610-614.

Feigal RJ (1998). Sealant and preventive restorations: review of effectiveness and clinical changes for improvement. Pediatr Dent 20:85-92.

10.

Feigal RJ , Hitt J. , Splieth C. (1993). Retaining sealant on salivary contaminated enamel . JAm Dent Assoc 124:88-97.

11.

Fritz UB , Finger WJ , Stean H. (1998). Salivary contamination during bonding procedures with one-bottle adhesive system. Quintessence Int 29:567-572.

12.

Futatsuki M. , Kubota K. , Yeh YC , Park K. , Moss SJ ( 1995). Early loss of pit and fissure sealant: a clinical and SEM study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 19:99-104.

13.

Going RE , Haugh LD , Grainger DA , Conti AJ (1977). Four-year clinical evaluation of a pit and fissure sealant. J Am Dent Assoc 95:972-981.

14.

Hebling J. , Feigal RJ (2000). Reducing sealant microleakage on saliva-contaminated enamel by using one bottle dentin adhesives as an intermediate bonding layer . Am J Dent 13:187-191.

15.

Hitt JC , Feigal RJ (1992). Use of a bonding agent to reduce sealant sensitivity to moisture contamination: an in vitro study. Pediatr Dent 14:41-46.

16.

Holst A. (1988). Behavior management problems in child dentistry. Frequency, therapy, and prediction. Swed Dent J Suppl 54:1-55.

17.

Horowitz AM , Frazier PJ (1982). Issues in the widespread adoption of pit-and-fissure sealants. J Public Health Dent 42:312-323.

18.

Horowitz HS , Heifetz SB , Poulsen S. (1977). Retention and effectiveness of a single application of an adhesive sealant in preventing occlusal caries: final report after five years of a study in Kalispell, Montana. J Am Dent Assoc 95:1133-1139.

19.

Kemp-Scholte CM , Davidson CL (1990). Complete marginal seal of class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 69:1240-1243.

20.

Klein JP , Moeschberger ML (1997). Survival analysis: techniques for censored and truncated data. New York: Springer-Verlag .

21.

Liebenberg WH (1994). The fissure sealant impasse. Quintessence Int 25:741-745.

22.

Messer LB , Calache H. , Morgan MV (1997). The retention of pit and fissure sealants placed in primary school children by Dental Health Services, Victoria. Aust Dent J 42:233-239.

23.

Musherure PR (2000). The effect of adhesive placement on sealant success: a multivariate survival analysis of results from a randomized trial with up to 54 months of follow-up (MS dissertation). Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan.

24.

Pendrys DG (1990). The fluorosis risk index: a method for investigating risk factors. J Public Health Dent 50:291-298.

25.

Rock WP , Bradnock G. (1981). Effect of operator variability and patient age on the retention of fissure sealant resin: 3 year results. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 9:207-209.

26.

SAS Institute Inc. (1997). SAS/STAT software: changes and enhancements through release 6.12. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.

27.

Selwitz RH , Winn DM , Kingman A. , Zion GR ( 1996). The prevalence of dental sealants in the US population: findings from the NHANES III, 1988-91. J Dent Res 75(Spec Iss):652-660.

28.

Straffon LH , Dennison JB , More FG ( 1985). Three-year evaluation of sealant: effect of isolation on efficacy. J Am Dent Assoc 10:714-717.

29.

Swift EJ Jr , Perdigao J. , Heymann HO (1998). Enamel bond strengths of "one-bottle" adhesives . Pediatr Dent 20:259-262.

30.

Symons AL , Chu CY , Meyers IA (1996). The effect of fissure morphology and pretreatment of the enamel surface on penetration and adhesion of fissure sealants. J Oral Rehabil 23:791-795.

31.

US Public Health Service (1991). Healthy people 2000: national health promotion and disease prevention objectives . Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, Publication no. (PHS) 91-50213.

32.

Van Meerbeek B. , Willems G. , Celis JP , Roos JR , Braem M. , Lambrechts P. , et al. (1993). Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res 72:1434-1442.

33.

Van Meerbeek B. , Perdigao J. , Lambrechts P. , Vanherle G. (1998). The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 26:1-20.