The Model of Culture Fit postulates that the sociocultural environment affects the internal work culture, which in turn influences human resource management practices. This model was tested by two independent cross-cultural studies comparing Indian and Canadian managers and employees. In assessing sociocultural environment and internal work culture, the “participant” technique was used in Study 1 (the respondents indicated their own beliefs and assumptions), and the “observant” technique was used in Study 2 (the respondents indicated beliefs and assumptions of the majority of individuals in society). In both studies, India scored higher than Canada on paternalism, power distance, uncertainty avoidance, loyalty toward community, reactivity, and futuristic orientation. Indian employees reported having less enriched jobs than did Canadian employees. Mediated multiple regression analyses supported the Model of Culture Fit. Results suggest that the paternalism, self-reliance, and employee participation constructs merit further exploration, as does participant methodology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bailyn, L. (1978). Accommodation of work to family. In R. Rapoport & R. N. Rapoport (Eds.), Working couples. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
2.
Baron, R. M. , & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
3.
Bass, B. M. (1981). Stogdill’s handbook of leadership (rev. ed.). New York: Free Press.
4.
Bond, M. H. (1988). Finding universal dimensions of individual variation in multicultural studies of values: The Rokeach and Chinese value surveys. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 1009-1015.
5.
Chao, Y. T. (1995). Culture and work organizations: The Chinese case. In H.S.R. Kao, D. Sinha, & N. Sek-Hong (Eds.), Effective organizations and social values (pp. 28-37). New Delhi, India: Sage.
6.
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for behavioral science. New York: Academic Press.
7.
Conger, J. A. , & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471-482.
8.
Cotton, J. L. (1993). Employee involvement: Methods for improving performance and work attitudes. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.
Erez, M. , & Earley, P. C. (1987). Comparative analysis of goal-setting strategies across cultures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 658-665.
10.
Hackman, J. R. , & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
11.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12.
Hofstede, G. (1983). Dimensions of national cultures in fifty countries and three regions. In J. Deregowski, S. Dzuirawiec, & R. Annis (Eds.), Expiscations in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 335-355). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
13.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
14.
Kanungo, R. N. , & Hartwick, J. (1987). An alternative to intrinsic-extrinsic reward dichotomy of work rewards. Journal of Management, 13(4), 751-766.
15.
Kanungo, R. N. , & Jaeger, A. M. (1990). Introduction: The need for indigenous management in developing countries. In A. M. Jaeger & R. N. Kanungo (Eds.), Management in developing countries (pp. 1-23). London: Routledge.
16.
Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17.
Khandwalla, P. N. (1988). Organizational effectiveness. In J. Pandey (Ed.), Psychology in India: The state-of-the-art (Vol. 3, pp. 97-216). New Delhi, India: Sage.
18.
Kim, U. M. (1994). Significance of paternalism and communalism in the occupational welfare system of Korean firms: A national survey. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (Cross-Cultural Research and Methodology, No. 18, pp. 251-266). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Kim, U. , Triandis, H. C., Kagitcibasi, C., Choi, S., & Yoon, G. (Eds.). (1994). Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (Cross-Cultural Research and Methodology, No. 18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Kluckhohn, F. R. , & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
21.
Leung, K. (1989). Cross-cultural differences: Individual-level and cultural-level analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 703-719.
22.
Leung, K. , & Bond, M. (1989). On the empirical identification of dimensions for cross-cultural comparisons. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 133-151.
23.
Lewin, K. , & Lippitt, R. (1938). An experimental approach to the study of autocracy and democracy: A preliminary note. Sociometry, 1, 292-300.
24.
Likert, R. (1961). New patterns of management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
25.
Locke, E. A. , & Latham, G. P. (1984). Goal setting: A motivational technique that works. Organizational Dynamics, 8(2), 68-80.
26.
Mathur, P. , Aycan, Z., & Kanungo, R. N. (1996). Indian organizational culture: A comparison between public and private sectors. Psychology and Developing Societies, 8(2), 199-222.
27.
McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.
28.
Mendonca, M. , & Kanungo, R. N. (1994). Managing human resources: The issue of culture fit. Journal of Management Inquiry, 3(3), 189-205.
29.
Parikh, I. J. , & Garg, P. K. (1990). Indian organizations: Value dilemmas in managerial roles. In A. M. Jaeger & R. N. Kanungo (Eds.), Management in developing countries (pp. 175-193). London: Routledge.
30.
Redding, S. G. , & Hsiao, H. M. (1995). An empirical study of overseas Chinese managerial ideology. In H.S.R. Kao, D. Sinha, & N. Sek-Hong (Eds.), Effective organizations and social values (pp. 72-85). New Delhi, India: Sage.
31.
Redding, S. G. , Norman, A., & Schlander, A. (1994). The nature of individual attachment to theory: A review of East Asian variations. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnett, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 674-688). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
32.
Rothbaum, F. M. , Weisz, J. R., & Snyder, S. S. (1982). Changing the world and changing self: A two process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 5-37.
33.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1, No. 609).
34.
Schein, E. H. (1978). Career dynamics: Matching individual and organizational needs. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
35.
Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Cultural dimensions of values: Towards an understanding of national differences. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theoretical and methodological issues (Cross-Cultural Research and Methodology, No. 18, pp. 85-119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
Sinha, J. B. P. (1982). Power in Indian organizations. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 17, 339-352.
38.
Sinha, J. B. P. (1990). Work culture in Indian context. New Delhi, India: Sage.
39.
Sinha, J. B. P. (1995). The cultural context of leadership and power. New Delhi, India: Sage.
40.
Sinha, J. B. P. , & Verma, J. (1987). Structure of collectivism. In C. Kagitcibasi (Ed.), Growth and progress in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 123-129). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
41.
Smith, P. B. , Dugan, S., & Trompenaars, F. (1996). National culture and the values of employees: A dimensional analysis across 43 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27(2), 231-264.
42.
Smith, P. B. ,& Peterson, M. F. (1996, August). Beyond value comparisons: Sources used to give meaning to management work events in thirty countries. Paper presented at the 26th International Congress of Psychology, Montreal.
43.
Stogdill, R. M. (1948). Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of literature. Journal of Psychology, 25, 35-71.
44.
Triandis, H. C. (1982). Review of culture’s consequences: International differences in workrelated values. Human Organization, 41, 86-90.
45.
Triandis, H. C. (1984). Towards a psychological theory of economic growth. International Journal of Psychology, 19, 79-95.
46.
Trompenaars, F. (1993). Riding the waves of culture. London: Brealey.
47.
van de Vijver, F. , & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
Verma, J. (1992). Allocentrism and relational orientation. In S. Iwawaki, Y. Kashima, & K. Leung (Eds.), Innovations in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 152-163). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
