The dual-focus approach to creating bilingual research protocols requires a bilingual/bicultural research team, including indigenous researchers from the cultures being studied. The presence of indigenous researchers as full and equal members of the research team can guard against an unexamined exportation of ideas and methods developed in one culture to other cultural/linguistic communities. The team develops the research plan and a research protocol that express a given concept with equal clarity, affect, and level of usage simultaneously in two languages. The dual-focus method employs a concept-driven rather than a translation-driven approach to attain conceptual and linguistic equivalence. Examples of the application of this approach to creating new measures in Spanish and English, adapting existing measures, revising instructions to research participants, and correcting official translations are provided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alarcón, O. , Erkut, S., García Coll, C., & Vázquez García, H. A. (1994). Engaging in culturallysensitive research on Puerto Rican youth. Wellesly, MA: Wellesley College Research Center for Research on Women, Working Paper No. 275.
2.
Altarriba, J. , & Mathis, K. M. (1997). Conceptual and lexical development in second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 550-568.
3.
Altarriba, J. , & Santiago-Rivera, A. L. (1994). Current perspectives on using linguistic and cultural factors in counseling the Hispanic client. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 25, 388-397.
4.
Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46(1), 5-33.
5.
Betancourt, H. , & Lopez, S. R. (1993). The study of culture, ethnicity, and race in American psychology. American Psychologist, 48(6), 627-637.
6.
Bontempo, R. (1993). Translation fidelity of psychological scales: An item-response theory analysis of an individualism-collectivism scale. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24(2), 149-166.
7.
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185-216.
8.
Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Cross-cultural research methodology series: Vol. 8. Field methods in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 137-164). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9.
Canino, I. A. , & Canino, G. C. (1980). Impact of stress on the Puerto Rican family: Treatment considerations. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 50, 535-541.
10.
Conners, C. K. (1973). Rating scales for use in drug studies with children. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 9, 24-84.
11.
de Groot, A. M. B. (1992). Determinants of word translation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1001-1018.
12.
de Groot, A. M. B. (1993). Word-type effects in bilingual processing tasks: Support for a mixed-representational system. In R. Schreuder & B. Weltens (Eds.), The bilingual lexicon (pp. 27-51). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
13.
DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
Fitzpatrick, J. P. (1987). Puerto Rican Americans: The meaning of migration to the mainland. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15.
Gergen, K. J. , Gulerce, A., Lock, A., & Misra, G. (1996). Psychological science in cultural context. American Psychologist, 51(5), 496-503.
16.
Grosjean, F. (1992). Another view of bilingualism. In R. J. Harris (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals, (pp. 51-62.) Amsterdam: North-Holland.
17.
Harter, S. , & Pike, R. (1983). Procedural manual to accompany: The pictorial scale of perceived competence and social acceptance for young children. Denver, CO: University of Denver.
18.
Hulin, C. L. (1987). A psychometric theory of evaluations of item and scale translations—fidelity across languages. Journal of Cross-Cultural Research, 18(2), 115-142.
19.
Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. London: Tavistock.
20.
Minuchin, S. , Rosman, B. L., & Baker, L. (1978). Psychosomatic families: Anorexia nervosa in context. London: Harvard University Press.
21.
Olmedo, E. L. (1981). Testing linguistic minorities. American Psychologist, 36(10), 1078-1085.
22.
Phinney, J. (1992). Multigroup ethnic identity measure. Journal of Adolescent Research, 1, 156-176.
23.
Rodriguez, C. E. (1989). Puerto Ricans born in the U.S.A. Boston: Unwyn Hyman.
24.
Sechrest, L. , Fay, T. L., & Zaidi, S. M. H. (1972). Problems of translation in cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 3(1), 41-56.
25.
Sinha, J. (1984). Toward partnership for relevant research to the Third World. Indian Journal of Psychology, 19, 169-178.
26.
Sperber, A. D. , DeVellis, R. F., & Boehlecke, B. (1994). Cross-cultural translation: Methodology and validation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25(4), 501-524.
27.
Streiner, D. L. , & Norman, G. R. (1995). Health measurement scales (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
28.
Szalacha, L. (1997, August). A measure of self-esteem for Puerto Rican children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago.
29.
Triandis, H. (1976). Approaches toward minimizing translation. In R. Breslin (Ed.), Translation: Applications and research (pp. 229-243). New York: Wiley/Halstead.
30.
Tropp, L. R. , Erkut, S., García Coll, C., Alarcón, O., & Vázquez García, H. A. (in press). Psychological acculturation: Development of a new measure for Puerto Ricans on the U.S. mainland. Educatonal and Psychological Measurement.
31.
Werner, O. , & Campbell, D. T. (1970). Translating, working through interpreters, and the problem of decentering. In R. Naroll & R. Cohen (Eds.), A handbook of method in cultural anthropology (pp. 398-420). New York: The Natural History Press.
