To clarify the arguments for and against indigenization, the author constructs a metatheory of cross-cultural comparisons between theories, theorists, and cultures. This metatheory makes clear that cross-cultural psychology encompasses both indigenous and exotic theories; accordingly, indigenous psychologies may be regarded as a subdomain of cross-cultural psychology. The case for indigenization rests on acknowledging a critical point: The conceptualization of psychological phenomena is a psychological phenomenon in itself and is, therefore, subject to investigation. Illustrations are provided on how indigenous theorizing derived from Filipino and Confucian heritage cultures makes a conceptual and methodological contribution. To go beyond indigenization, methodological relationalism is explicated as a conceptual framework originating from Asia toward the realization of a universal psychology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Choi, S.-C. , Kim, U., & Choi, S.-H. (1993). Indigenous analysis of collective representations: A Korean perspective. In U. Kim & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context. (pp. 193-210). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Doi, L. T. (1956). Japanese language as an expression of Japanese psychology. Western Speech, 20, 90-96.
3.
Enriquez, V. G. (1977). Filipino psychology in the Third World. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 10, 3-18.
4.
Enriquez, V. G. (1992). From colonial to liberation psychology: The Phillipine experience. Quezon City, Phillipines: University of the Philippines Press.
5.
Enriquez, V. G. (1993). Developing a Filipino psychology. In U. Kim & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context. (pp. 152-169). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
Gergen, K. J. , Gulerce, A., Lock, A., & Misra, G. (1996). Psychological science in cultural context. American Psychologist, 51, 496-503.
7.
Ho, D.Y.F. (1976). On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 867-884.
8.
Ho, D. Y. F. (1988). Asian psychology: A dialogue on indigenization and beyond. In A. C. Paranjpe, D.Y.F. Ho, & R. W. Rieber (Eds.), Asian contributions to psychology. (pp. 53-77). New York: Praeger.
9.
Ho, D. Y. F. (1992). A metatheory of cross-cultural comparisons: Confronting culturocentrism. In U. P. Gielen, L. L. Adler, & N. A. Milgram (Eds.), Psychology in international perspective: 50 years of the International Council of Psychologist. (pp. 186-198). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
10.
Ho, D.Y.F. (1995). Selfhood and identity in Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism, and Hinduism: Contrasts with the West. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 25, 115-139.
11.
Ho, D.Y.F. (1998). Interpersonal relationships and relationship dominance: An analysis based on methodological relationalism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 1-16.
12.
Kim, U. , & Berry, J. W. (Eds.). (1993). Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13.
Lebra, T. S. (1976). Japanese patterns of behavior. Honolulu, HI: University Press of Hawaii.
14.
Markus, H. R. , & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
15.
Paranjpe, A. C. , Ho, D.Y.F., & Rieber, R. W. (Eds.). (1988). Asian contributions to psychology. New York: Praeger.
16.
Sinha, D. (1997). Indigenizing psychology. In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Vol. 1. Theory and method. (2nd ed., pp. 129-169). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
17.
Torres, A. T. (1982). Pakapa-kapa as an approach in Philippine psychology. In R. Pe-Pua (Ed.), Filipino psychology: Theory, method and applicatio. (pp. 171-174). Quezon City, Phillipines: Philippine Psychology Research and Training House.
18.
Yang, C. F. (1993). Attempting to theorize on how to study Chinese personality: Deriving experience and inspiration from Western studies of personality and social psychology and of culture and personality. In K. S. Yang & A. B. Yue (Eds.), Psychology and behavior of Chinese people: Concepts and method. [In Chinese] (pp. 319-439). Taipei, Taiwan: Kuei Kuan.
19.
Yang, K. S. (1993). The social orientation of Chinese people: A social interaction view. In K. S. Yang & A. B. Yue (Eds.), Psychology and behavior of Chinese people: Concepts and method. [In Chinese] (pp. 87-142). Taipei, Taiwan: Kuei Kuan.
20.
Yang, K. S. , & Ho, D.Y.F (1988). The role of yuan in Chinese social life: A conceptual and empirical analysis. In A. C. Paranjpe, D.Y.F Ho, & R. W. Rieber (Eds.), Asian contributions to psychology (pp. 263-281). New York: Praeger.
