Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A meta-analysis of cross-cultural comparisons of cognitive test scores published between 1973 and 1994 is presented. Larger performance differences were found in cross-national than in intranational (cross-ethnic) comparisons. There was a strong age bias, with an overrepresentation of primary-school-age children. Five models to explain cross-cultural differences in cognitive performance were examined. First, these differences showed a positive relationship with differences in affluence of the cultural groups. Second, performance differences increased with chronological and educational age. Third, only in intranational studies were performance differences positively related to the complexity of stimuli. Fourth, performance differences were larger on common Western tasks than on locally developed non-Western tasks. Finally, performance differences were not larger for abstract thinking than for other cognitive domains. Cross-cultural performance differences were better predicted by task characteristics in intranational comparisons and by population characteristics in cross-national comparisons.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ballantine, J. H. (1993). The sociology of education: A systematic analysis. (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Berk, R. A. (Ed.). (1982). Handbook of methods for detecting test bias. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Berry, J. W. , Poortinga, Y H. , Segall, M. H. , & Dasen, P. R. , (1992). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Born, M. P. , Bleichrodt, N. , & Van der Flier, H. (1987). Cross-cultural comparison of sex-related differences on intelligence tests: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 283-283 14.

Buck-Morss, S. (1975). Socio-economic bias in Piaget's theory and its implications for Cross-Cultural studies. Human Development, 18, 35-49.

Camilli, G. , & Shepard, L. N. (1994). Methods for identifying biased test items. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Ceci, S. J. (1990). On intelligence.. more or less: A bio-ecological treatise on intellectual development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Chapman, M. (1988). Contextuality and directionality of cognitive development. Human Development, 31, 92-106.

10.

Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 145-153.

11.

Hedges, L. V. , & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

12.

Hofstede, G. (198O). Culture's consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

13.

Holland, P. W. , & Wainer, H. (Eds.). (1993). Differential item functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

14.

Irvine, S. H. (1979). The place of factor analysis in cross-cultural methodology and its contribution to cognitive theory. In L. Eckensberger , W. Lonner , & Y H. Poortinga (Eds.), Cross-cultural contributions to psychology. (pp. 300-341). Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

15.

Irvine, S. H. , & Berry, J. W. (1988). The abilities of mankind: A revaluation. In S. H. Irvine & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Human abilities in cultural context. (pp. 3-59). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Jensen, A. R. (1977). Cumulative deficit in intelligence of Blacks in the rural South. Developmental Psychology, 13, 184-191.

17.

Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.

18.

Mercer, J. R. (1984). What is a racially and culturally nondiscriminatory test? In C. R. Reynolds & R. T. Brown (Eds.), Perspectives on bias in mental testing (pp. 293-356). New York: Plenum.

19.

Öngel, U. , & Smith, P. B. (1994). Who are we and where are we going? JCCP approaches its 100th issue. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 25-53.

20.

Rogoff, B. (1981). Schooling and the development of cognitive skills. In H. C. Triandis & A. Heron (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. (Vol. 4, pp. 233-294). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

21.

Rogoff, B. , & Chavajay, P. (1995). What's become of research on the cultural basis of cognitive development? American Psychologist, 50, 859-877.

22.

Segall, M. H. , Dasen, P. R. , Berry, J. W. , & Poortinga, Y H. (1990). Human behavior in global perspective. New York: Pergamon.

23.

Spearman, C. (1923). The abilities of man. New York: Macmillan.

24.

Sternberg, R. J. , & Wagner, R. K. (Eds.). (1986). Practical intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

25.

Tulviste, P. (1991). The cultural-historical development of verbal thinking. Commack, NY: Nova Science.

26.

United Nations . (1988). 1985/1986 statistical yearbook. New York: Author.

27.

Van de Vijver, F.J.R. , & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis of comparative research. In J. W. Berry , Y. H. Poortinga , & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. (2nd ed., vol. 1, pp. 257-300). Chicago: Allyn & Bacon.

28.

Van de Vijver, F.J.R. , & Poortinga, Y H. (1997). Towards an integrated analysis of bias in cross-cultural assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13, 29-37.

29.

Van de Vijver, F.J.R. , & Willemsen, M. E. (1993). Abstract thinking. In J. Altarriba (Ed.), Culture and cognition. (pp. 317-342). Amsterdam: North Holland.

30.

Van der Flier, H. (1980). Vergelijkbaarheid van individuele testprestaties [Comparability of individual test performances]. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

31.

Vernon, P. E. (1950). The structure of human abilities. New York: John Wiley.

32.

Vernon, P. E. (1979). Intelligence: Heredity and environment. San Francisco: Freeman.

Meta-Analysis of Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Cognitive Test Performance

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References