This study examined the relatedness of field-dependence to tasks of cognitive ability and academic achievement. Sixty Anglo American and 60 Mexican American 4th-grade students, whose primary home language was English, served as subjects. Students completed a series of associative-memory and reasoning ability tasks. Field-dependence evidenced a strong relationship with a nonverbal test of reasoning ability as well as with measures of reading and math achievement. Ethnic differences in the field-dependence construct were not found, although ethnic differences in academic achievement were evidenced. Achievement differences between Anglo and Mexican American students became nonsignificant, however, when parental level of education was controlled statistically. Finally, the best predictor of academic achievement was found to be a three-variable combination, which consisted of a field-dependence task, a nonverbal test of reasoning ability, and the student's parental level of education. Results of this study support the hypothesis that field-dependence is better considered as a measure of reasoning ability than of cognitive style although it remains of substantial importance as a nonbiased predictor of school achievement for majority and minority students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alderton, D. L. , & Larson, G. E. (1990). Dimensionality of Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices items. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 887-900.
2.
Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing. (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
3.
Arthur, W. , & Woehr, D. J. (1993). A confirmatory factor analytic study examining the dimensionality of the Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 471-478.
4.
Barona, A. , & Pfeiffer, S. I. (1992). Effects of test administration procedures and acculturation level on achievement scores. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 10, 124-132.
5.
Bouvier, L. F. , & Davis, C. B. (1982). The future racial composition of the United States. Washington, DC: Demographic Information Services Center for the Population Reference Bureau.
6.
Carter, T. P. , & Segura, R. D. (1979). Mexican-Americans in school. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
7.
Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing. (5th ed.). Hillsdale, NY: Harper & Row.
8.
Davis, J. K. (1991). Educational implications of field-dependence. In S. Wapner & J. Demick (Eds.), Field dependence-independence: Cognitive styles across the life span. (pp. 149-176). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Davis, J. K. , & Cochran, K. F. (1989). An information processing view of field dependence-independence. Early Child Development and Care, 43, 129-145.
10.
Duran, R. P. (1989). Assessment and instruction of at-risk Hispanic students. Exceptional Children, 56, 154-158.
11.
Emerling, F. (1990). An investigation of test bias in two nonverbal cognitive measures for two ethnic groups. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 34-41.
12.
Figueroa, R. A. (1980). Field dependence, ethnicity and cognitive styles. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 2, 35-42.
13.
Frank, B. M. (1983). Flexibility of information processing and the memory of field independent and field dependent learners. Journal of Research in Personality, 17, 89-96.
14.
Frank, B. M. , & Davis, J. K. (1982). Effect of field-independence match or mismatch on a communication task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 23-31.
15.
Goldman, S. R. , & Trueba, H. T. (Eds.). (1987). Becoming literate in English as a second language. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
16.
Goodenough, D. R. (1976). The role of individual differences in field-independence as a factor in learning and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 675-694.
17.
Guilford, J. P. (1980). Cognitive styles: What are they?. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40,715-735.
18.
Hagen, J. W. (1967). The effect of distraction on selective attention. Child Development, 38, 685-694.
19.
Hernandez, N. (1973). Variables affecting achievement of middle school Mexican-American students. Review of Educational Research, 43, 1-40.
20.
Inclan, J. , & Hemandez, M. (1992). Cross-cultural perspectives and codependence: The case of poor Hispanics. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 62, 245-255.
21.
Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.
22.
Jolly, P. E. , & Strawitz, B. M. (1984). Teacher-student cognitive style and achievement in biology. Science Education, 68,487-492.
23.
Kagan, S. , & Buriel, R. (1977). Field dependence-independence and Mexican-American culture and education. In J. L. Martinez (Ed.), Chicano psychology. (pp. 279-328). New York: Academic Press.
24.
Knight, G. P. , Bemal, M. E., Garza, C. A., Cota, M. K., & Ocampo, K. A. (1993). Family socialization and the ethnic identity of Mexican-American children. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24, 99-114.
25.
Knight, G. P. , Kagan, S., Nelson, W., & Gumbiner, J. (1978). Acculturation of second and third generation Mexican-American children: Field independence, locus of control, self-esteem, and school achievement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 9, 87-97.
26.
Laosa, L. M. (1982). School, occupation, culture, and family: The impact of parental schooling on the parent-child relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 791-827.
27.
Laosa, L. M. (1984). Ethnic, socioeconomic, and home language influences on early performance on measures of ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1178-1198.
28.
Laosa, L. M. , & DeAvila, E. (1979). Development of cognitive style among Chicanos in traditional and dualistic communities. International Journal of Psychology, 14, 91-98.
29.
Martinez, R. , & Norman, R. D. (1984). Effects of acculturation on field independence among Chicano children. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 6, 113-126.
30.
McNemar, Q. (1975). On so-called test bias. American Psychologist, 30, 848-851.
31.
Mercer, J. R. (1979). In defense of racially and culturally nondiscriminatory assessment. School Psychology Digest, 8, 89-115.
32.
Mickelson, R. (1990). The attitude-achievement paradox among Black adolescents. Sociology of Education, 63, 44-61.
33.
National Assessment of Educational Progress . (1990). The reading report card, 1976-1988. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
34.
Nelson, W. , Knight, G. P., Kagan, S., & Gumbiner, J. (1980). Locus of control, self-esteem, and field independence as predictors of school achievement among Anglo-American and Mexican American children. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 2, 323-335.
35.
Padilla, A. M. , Lindholm, K. J., Chen, A., Duran, R., Hakuta, K., Lambert, W., & Tucker, G. R. (1991). The English-only movement: Myths, reality, and implications for psychology. American Psychologist, 46, 120-130.
36.
Powers, S. , & Barkan, J. H. (1986). Concurrent validity of the Standard Progressive Matrices for Hispanic and non-Hispanic seventh-grade students. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 333-336.
37.
Powers, S. , Barkan, J. H., & Jones, P. B. (1986). Reliability of the Standard Progressive Matrices Test for Hispanic and Anglo-American children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62, 348-350.
38.
Ramirez, M. (1982, March). Cognitive styles and cultural diversity. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Education Research Association, New York.
39.
Ramirez, M. , & Castaneda, A. (1974). Cultural democracy, bicognitive development, and education. New York: Academic Press.
40.
Ramirez, M. , & Price-Williams, D. R. (1974). Cognitive styles of children of three ethnic groups in the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5, 212-219.
41.
Ramirez, M. , & Price-Williams, D. R. (1976). Achievement motivation in children of three ethnic groups in the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 7, 49-60.
42.
Ramirez, M. , Castaneda, A., & Herold, P. L. (1974). The relationship of acculturation to cognitive style among Mexican-Americans. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5, 424-533.
43.
Raven, J. C. , Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1986). Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
44.
Robertson, R. J. , & Alfano, P. (1985). Field dependence as a limiting factor in solving a complex learning problem. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 276-278.
45.
Saracho, O. N. (1983). Cultural differences in the cognitive style of Mexican-American students. Journal of the Association for the Study of Perception, International, 18, 3-10.
46.
Saracho, O. N. (1988). Cognitive styles and young children's learning. Early Child Development and Care, 30, 213-220.
47.
Saracho, O. N. (1991). Teacher expectations and cognitive style: Implications for students' academic achievement. Early Child Development and Care, 77, 97-108.
48.
Saracho, O. N. , & Dayton, C. M. (1980). Relationship of teachers' cognitive styles to pupils' academic achievement gains. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 544-549.
49.
Shade, B. J. (1982). Afro-American cognitive style: A variable in school success. Review of Educational Research, 52, 219-244.
50.
So, A. Y. , & Chan, K. S. (1984). What matters? The relative impact of language background and socioeconomic status on reading achievement. The Journal for the National Association for Bilingual Education, 8, 27-41.
51.
Steinberg, L. , Dombusch, S. M., & Brown, B. B. (1992). Ethnic differences in adolescent achievement: An ecological perspective. American Psychologist, 47,723-729.
52.
Valencia, R. R. (1984). Reliability of the Raven Coloured Progressive Matrices for Anglo and for Mexican-American children. Psychology in the Schools, 21, 49-52.
53.
Valencia, R. R. , Henderson, R. W., & Rankin, R. J. (1981). Relationship of family constellation and schooling to intellectual performance of Mexican American children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 524-532.
54.
Widiger, T. A. , Knudson, R. M., & Rorer, L. G. (1980). Convergent and discriminant validity of measures of cognitive styles and abilities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 116-129.
55.
Witkin, H. A. , & Goodenough, D. R. (1981). Cognitive styles: Essence and origins. New York: International Universities Press.
56.
Witkin, H. A. , Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). A manual for the Embedded Figures Test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists' Press.
57.
Zayas, L. (1988). Puerto Rican familism: Considerations for family therapy. Family Relations, 37, 260-268.
