Three recent studies in the United Stats investigated the impact of negative feeling statements in intimate relationships. Accusatory "You" messages were rted as more likely to evoke animosity and antagonistic behavior than were assertive 'T' messages. Statements communicating angry feelings were rated as more likely to evoke animosity and antagonistic behavior than were statements communicating feelings of distress. The present study investigated the applicability of these findings in an Asian culture using a native language. College students in the Philippines rated their likely reactions to negative feeling statements written either in English or Tagalog. Overal findings were consistent with results obtained with American subjects. Effects due to language were not in a consistent direction. The authors conclude that verbalized anger and blame may evoke emotional and behavioral inclinations that are universally antagonistic, and that cultural, gender, and language differences-where they occur-may be in degree rather than direction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alberti, R. R. , & Emmons, M. L (1986). Your perfect right: A guide to assertive living (5th ed.). San Luis Obispo, CA: Impact
2.
Angco, O. R. , Samson, L L, & Albino, T. M. (198O). The saus of women in the Philippines. Quezon City, Philippines: Alemar-Phoenix.
3.
Averill, J. R. (1983). Studies on anger and aggrssion: Implications for theories of emotion. American Psychologist, 38,1145-1160.
4.
Baer, J. (1976). How to be an assertive (not aggressive) woman in life, in love, and on the job: A total guide to se-assertiveness. New York: Signet
5.
Baron, R. A. (1971). Magnitude of victim's pain cues and level of prior anger arousal as determinants of adult aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 236-243.
6.
Berkowitz, L. (1973). Words and symbols as stimuli to aggressive responses. In J. F. Knutson (Ed.), Control of aggression: Implications from basic research. (pp. 113-143). Chicago: Aldine-Aherton.
7.
Berkowitz, L. (1982). Aversive conditions as stimuli to aggression. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 249-288.
8.
Berkowitz, L. (1983). Aversively stimulated aggression: Some parallels and differences in research with animals and humans. American Psychologist, 38, 1135-1144.
9.
Berkowitz, L. (1984). The experience of anger as a paallel process in the display of impulsive 'angry" aggression. In R. G. Geen & E. I. Donnerstein (Eds.), Aggression: Theoretical and empirical review. (Vol. 1, pp. 103-133). New York: Academic Press.
10.
Berkowitz, L. (1989). Frustration-hypothesis: Examination and reformulation.Psychological Bulletin, 106,59-73.
11.
Berkowitz, L. , & Heimer, K. (1989). On the construction of the anger experience: Aversive events and negative priming in the formation of feelings. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. (Vol. 22, pp. 1-37). New York: Academic Press.
12.
Biglan, A. , Rothlind, J., Hops, H., & Sherman, L. (1989). Impact of distressed and aggressive behavior. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98, 218-228.
13.
Bradbury, T. N. (1991, April). Marital satisfaction and appraisals following marital interactions. Paper presented at the Western Psychological Association Convention, San Francisco.
14.
Bradbury, T. N. , & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Assessment of affect in marriage. In K. D. O'Leary(Ed.), Assessment of marital discord: An integration for research and practice. (pp. 59-108). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Bradbury, T. N. , & Fincham, F. D. (1987). Attributions in marriage: Review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 107,3-33.
16.
Brislin, R. (1971). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185-216.
17.
Carlson, M. , Marcus-Newhall, A., & Miller, N. (1990). Effects of situational aggressive cues: A quantitative review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 622-633.
18.
Church, A. T. (1986). Filipino personality: A review of research and writings. Manila: De La Salle University Press.
19.
Delamater, R. J. , & McNamara, J. R. (1986). The social impact of assertiveness: Research findings and clinical implications. Behavior Modification, 10, 139-158.
20.
Ekman, P. (1972). Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In J. Cole (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1972. (Vol. 19). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
21.
Enriquez, V. M. , & Brislin, R. W. (1977). The measurement of affective content in translation and interpretation: American English and Filipino. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 10, 55-69.
22.
Fincham, F. D. , Beach S. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1989). Marital distress, depression, and attributions: Is the marital distress-attribution association an artifact of depression?Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57,768-771.
23.
Frodi, A. (1978). Experiential and physiological responses associated with anger and aggression in women and men. Journal of Research in Personality, 12, 335-349.
24.
Gottman, J. M. (1979). Marital interactions: Experimental investigations. New York: Academic Press.
25.
Gottman, J. M. , & Krokoff, L. J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57,47-52.
26.
Hewes, D. D. (1975). On effective assertive behavior: A brief note. Behavior Therapy, 6, 269-271.
27.
Heyman, R. E., Weiss, R. L., & Eddy, J. M. (1990). Marital Interaction Coding System-IV. Unpublished manuscript, University of Oregon, Eugene.
28.
Hollandsworth, J. G. , (1977). Differentiating assertion and aggression: Some behavioral guidelines. Behavior Therapy, 8, 347-352.
29.
Jakubowski, P. , & Lange, A. (1978). The assertive option: Your rights and responsibilities. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
30.
Kubany, E. S. , Bauer, G. B., Muraoka, M. Y, Richard, D. C., & Read, P. (in press). Impact of labeled anger and blame in intimate relationships. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology.
31.
Kubany, E. S. , Richard, D. C., & Bauer, G. B. (1992a). Impact of assertive and aggressive communication of distress and anger: A verbal component analysis. Aggressive Behavior, 18, 337-347.
32.
Kubany, E. S. , Richard, D. C., & Bauer, G. B. (1992b). Verbalized anger and accusatory "You" messages as cues for anger and antagonism among adolescent girls and boys. Adolescence, 27, 505-516.
33.
Lapuz, L. V. (1977). Filipino marriages in crisis. Quezon City, Philippines: New Day.
34.
Lapuz, L. V. (1978). A study of psychopathology. Quezon City, Philippines: New Day.
35.
Lewis, P. N. , & Gallois, C. (1984). Disagreements, refusals, or negatively assertive messages from friends and strangers. Behavior Therapy, 15, 353-368.
36.
Matsumoto, D. , Kudoh, T., Scherer, K., & Wallbott, H. (1988). Antecedents of and reactions to emotions in the United States and Japan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17,267-285.
37.
Novaco, R. W. (1985). Anger, stress, and coping with provocation: An instructional manual. Irvine: University of California, Irvine.
38.
Rule, B. G. , & Nesdale, A. R. (1976). Emotional arousal and aggressive behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 851-863.
39.
Russell, J. A. (1991). Culture and the categorization of emotions. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 426-450.
40.
SAS. (1985). SAS users guide: Statistics, Version 5 edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
41.
Smith, D. A. , Vivian, D., & O'Leary, K. D. (1990). Longitudinal prediction of marital discord from premarital expressions of affect. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 790-798.
42.
Staats, A. W. (1963). Complex human behavior. New York: SAGE Publications. (With contributions by C. K. Staats)
43.
Staats, A. W. (1975). Social behaviorism. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
44.
Tennen, H. , & Affleck, G. (1990). Blaming others for threatening events. Psychological Bulletin, 108,209-232.
45.
Wallbott, H. G. , & Scherer, K. (1986). How universal and specific is emotional experience? Evidence from 27 counties on five continents. Social Science Information, 25, 763-795.
46.
Weiss, R. L. , & Heyman, R. E. (1990). Observation of marital interaction. In F. D. Fincham, and T. N. Bradbuy (Eds.), The psychology of marriage: Basic issues and applications (pp. 87-117). New York: Guilford.
