This study investigates individual and cultural differences in embarrassability (i.e., susceptibility to embarrassment). Three hypotheses are formulated. First, the strength of the independent self-construal (the image of self as separate from others) is negatively correlated with embarrassability. Second, the strength of the interdependent self-construal (the image of self as connected with others) is positively associated with embarrassability. Third, Asian Americans are more susceptible to embarrassment than are Euro-Americans. A total of 503 Euro-American and Asian American -university students completed the Self-Construal Scale and the Embarrassability Scale. Results strongly supported all hypotheses. Further, individual differences in self-construal accounted for cultural differences in embarrassability. Many prior studies have associated embarrassability with social deficiencies; the authors propose that embarrassability be viewed in abroader cultural context that considers its functions as an adaptive mechanism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Argyle, M. , Henderson, M., Bond, M., fizuka, Y., & Contarello, A. (1986). Cross-cultural variations in relationship rules. International Journal of Psychology, 21, 287-315.
2.
Bond, M. H. (1986). The psychology of the Chinese people. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
Bontempo, R. (1993). Translation fidelity of psychological scales. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24, 149-166.
4.
Brislin, R. (1993). Understanding culture's influence on behavior. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
5.
Cross, S. E. , & Markus, H. R. (1991, July). Cultural adaption and the self: Self-construal, coping, and stress. Paper presented at the 99th annual convention of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.
6.
Cupach, W. R. , & Imahori, T. T. (1993). Managing social predicaments created by others: A comparison of Japanese and American facework. Western Journal of Communication, 57, 431-444.
7.
Cupach, W. R. , & Metts, S. (1990). Remedial processes in embarrassing predicaments. In J. A. Anderson (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 13, pp. 323-352). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
Cupach, W. R. , & Metts, S. (1992). The effects of type of predicament and embarrassability on remedial responses to embarrassing situations. Communication Quarterly, 40, 149-161.
9.
Edelmann, R. J. (1987). The psychology of embarrassment. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
10.
Edelmann, R. J. , Asendorpf, J., Contarello, A., Georgas, J., Villanueva, C., & Zammuner, V. (1987). Self-reported verbal and non-verbal strategies for coping with embarrassment in five European cultures. Social Science Information, 26, 869-883.
11.
Edelmann, R. J. , & Iwawaki, S. (1987). Self-reported expression and consequences of embarrassment in the United Kingdom and Japan. Psychologia, 30, 205-216.
12.
Edelmann, R. J. , & McCusker, G. (1986). Introversion, neuroticism, empathy and embarrassability. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 133-140.
13.
Edelmann, R. J. , & Neto, F. (1989). Self-reported expression and consequences of embarrassment in Portugal and the U.K.International Journal of Psychology, 24, 351-366.
14.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18, 213-231.
16.
Goffman, E. (1956). Embarrassment and social organization. American Journal of Sociology, 62,264-274.
17.
Greenwald, A. G. , & Pratkanis, A. R. (1984). The self. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 129-178). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
Hecht, M. L. , Ribeau, S., & Alberts, J. K. (1989). An Afro-American perspective on interethnic communication. Communication Monographs, 56, 385-410.
19.
Ho, D.Y.F (1993). Relational orientation in Asian social psychology. In U. Kim & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 240-259). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21.
Hui, H. C. (1988). Measurement of individualism-collectivism. Journal of Research in Personality, 22, 17-36.
22.
Kagitcibasi, C. (1994). A critical appraisal of individualism-collectivism: Toward a new formulation. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, S.-C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and application (pp. 52-65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
Kihlstrom, J. R. , & Cantor, N. (1984). Mental representations of the self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 17,1-47.
24.
Kim, M. S. (1993). Culture-based interactive constraints in explaining cross-cultural strategic competence. In R. L. Wiseman & J. Koester (Eds.), International and intercultural communication annual (Vol. 17, pp. 132-150). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25.
Kim, M. S. , Sharkey, W. F., & Singelis, T. M. (1994). The relationship between individuals' self-construals and perceived importance of interactive constraints. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 18, 117-140.
26.
Leary, M. R. (1991). Social anxiety, shyness, and related constructs. In J. Robinson, P. Shaver, & L. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 161-194). New York: Academic Press.
27.
Leary, M. R. , & Meadows, S. (1991). Predictors, elicitors, and concomitants of social blushing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 254-262.
28.
Lebra, T. S. (1976). Japanese patterns of behavior. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
29.
Lebra, T. S. (1992). Self in Japanese culture. In N. Rosenberger (Ed.), Japanese sense of self (pp. 105-120). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Markus, H. R. , & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
31.
Markus, H. R. , & Kitayama, S. (1994). Acollective fear of the collective: Implications for selves and theories of selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 568-579.
32.
Markus, H. R. , & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: Asocial psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299-337.
33.
Marsella, A. , DeVos, G., & Hsu, EL.K. (Eds.). (1985). Culture and the self. London: Tavistock.
34.
Miller, R. S. (1987). Empathic embarrassment: Situational and personal determinants of reactions to the embarrassment of another. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1061-1069.
35.
Miller, R. S. , & Leary, M. R. (1992). Social sources and interactive functions of emotion: The case of embarrassment. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Emotion and social behavior (pp. 202-221). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36.
Modigliani, A. (1966). Embarrassment and social influence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Michigan.
37.
Modigliani, A. (1968). Embarrassment and embarrassability. Sociometry, 31, 313-326.
38.
Roland, A. (1988). In search of self in India and Japan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
Rosenthal, R. , & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Sampson, E. E. (1988). The debate on individualism: Indigenous psychologies of the individual and their role in personal and societal functioning. American Psychologist, 43, 15-22.
41.
SAS Institute . (1992). SAS/STAT version 6.08 [computer program]. Cary, NC: Author.
42.
Schlenker, B. R. , & Leary, M. R. (1982). Social anxiety and self-presentation: A conceptualization and model. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 641-669.
43.
Sharkey, W. F. (1992). Use and responses to intentional embarrassment. Communication Studies, 43, 257-275.
44.
Sharkey, W. F. (1993). Who embarrasses whom? Relational and sex differences in the use of intentional embarrassment. In P. Kalbfleisch (Ed.), Interpersonal communication: Evolving interpersonal relationships (pp. 147-168). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45.
Sharkey, W. F. , & Singelis, T. M. (1993, June). Embarrassability and relational orientation. Paper presented at fourth annual conference of the International Network on Personal Relationships, Milwaukee, WI.
46.
Sharkey, W. F. , & Stafford, L. (1990). Responses to embarrassment. Human Communication Research, 17, 315-342.
47.
Shweder, R. A. , & Boume, E. J. (1984). Does the concept of person vary cross-culturally? In R. A. Shweder & R. A. LeVine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self and emotion (pp. 158-199). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48.
Shweder, R. A. , & Sullivan, M. A. (1993). Cultural psychology: Who needs it?Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 497-523.
49.
Silver, M. , Sabini, J., & Parrott, G. (1987). Embarrassment: Adramaturgic account. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 17,47-61.
50.
Singelis, T. M. (1994a, July). Gender, ethno-cultural, and individual differences in emotional contagion. Paper presented to the Intercultural and Developmental Communication Division of the 44th annual conference of the International Communication Association, Sydney, Australia.
51.
Singelis, T. M. (1994b). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580-591.
52.
Singelis, T. M. , & Brown, W. J. (1995). Culture, self, and collectivist communication: Linking culture to individual behavior. Human Communication Research, 21, 354-389.
53.
Sueda, K. , & Wiseman, R. L. (1992). Embarrassment remediation in Japan and the United States. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 16, 159-173.
54.
Tracy, K. (1990). The many faces of facework. In H. Giles & W. P. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 209-226). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
55.
Trafimow, D. , Triandis, H. C., & Goto, S. G. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 649-655.
56.
Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96,506-520.
57.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
58.
Triandis, H. C. , Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323-338.
59.
Triandis, H. C. , Marin, G., Lisansky, J., & Betancourt, H. (1984). Simpatia as a cultural script of Hispanics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1363-1375.
60.
Yamaguchi, S. (1994). Collectivism among the Japanese: Aperspective from the self. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, S.-C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and application (pp. 175-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61.
Yum, J. O. (1988). The impact of Confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in East Asia. Communication Monographs, 55, 374-388.
