This study compared the self-concepts of college students in India to those in the United States by administering the Twenty Statements Test. Self-statements were analyzed in terms of five categories (social identity, ideological beliefs, interests, ambitions, and self-evaluations) and a numberof subcategories (e.g., self-identity, group identity, gender role identity). Results indicated differential use of the categories and subcategories in the two cultures. For example, Americans made more self-evaluation statements, whereas Indians responded more in terms of social identity. Women in both cultures made more frequent use of stereotypical gender characteristics in describing themselves; men had a larger proportion of responses in the self-identity category. However, cross-cultural differences were much greater than gender differences. These findings shed light on major components of the self-concept and underline its culture-specific determinants.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Banaji, M. R. , & Prentice, D. A. (1994). The self in social context. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 297-332.
2.
Belenky, M. , Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N., & Tarule, J. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
3.
Bharati, A. (1985). The self in Hindu thought and action. In A. J. Marsella, G. DeVos, & F.L.K. Hsu (Eds.), Culture and self. Asian and Western perspectives (pp. 185-230). London: Tavistock.
4.
Bond, M. H. , & Tak-sing, C. (1983). College students' spontaneous self-concept: The effect of culture among respondents in Hong Kong, Japan, and the United States. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 14, 153-171.
5.
Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 389-444). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
6.
Cousins, S. D. (1989). Culture and self-perception in Japan and the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 124-131.
7.
Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade's research on gender. American Psychologist, 39, 105-116.
8.
Driver, E. D. (1969). Self-conceptions in India and the United States: A cross-validation of the Twenty Statements Test. Sociological Quarterly, 10, 341-354.
9.
Driver, E. D. , & Driver, A. E. (1983). Gender, society, and self-conceptions: India, Iran, Trinidad-Tobago, and the United States. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 34, 200-216.
10.
Epstein, S. (1980). The self-concept: A review and the proposal of an integrated theory of personality. In E. Staub (Ed.), Personality: Basic aspects and currentresearch (pp. 81-132). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
11.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
12.
Gergen, K. J. (1971). The concept of self. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
13.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
Gordon, C. , & Gergen, K. J. (Eds.). (1968). The self in social interaction. New York: Wiley.
15.
Greenwald, A. G. , & Pratkanis, A. R. (1984). The self. In R. S. Wyer & J. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 129-178). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
Hsu, F.L.K. (1963). Clan, caste, and club: A comparative study of Chinese, Hindu, andAmerican ways of life. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
18.
Jones, C. A. (1980). Observations on the current status of women in India. International Journal of Women's Studies, 3, 1-18.
19.
Jones, R. A. , Sensenig, J., & Haley, J. V. (1974). Self-descriptions: Configurations of content and order effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 36-45.
20.
Kennedy, B. C. (1973). On being a woman-Indian and American: A comparative study. Asian Survey, 13, 833-852.
21.
Kihlstrom, J. F. , & Cantor, N. (1984). Mental representations of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 1-47). New York: Academic Press.
22.
Kuhn, M. H. (1960). Self-attitudes by sex and professional training. Sociological Quarterly, 1, 39-55.
23.
Kuhn, M. H. , & McPartland, T. S. (1954). An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Review, 19, 68-76.
24.
Maccoby, E. E. , & Jacklin, C. N. (1987). Gender segregation in childhood. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 20, 239-287.
25.
Markus, H. (1983). Self-knowledge: An expanded view. Journal of Personality, 51, 543-565.
26.
Markus, H. R. , & Cross, S. E. (1990). The interpersonal self. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 576-608). New York: Guilford.
27.
Markus, H. R. , & Kitayarna, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
28.
Markus, H. , & Smith, J. (1981). The influence of self-schemata on the perception of others. In N. Cantor & J. Kihlstrom (Eds.), Personality, cognition, and social interaction (pp. 233-262). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Marsella, A. J. (1985). Culture, self, and mental disorder. In A. J. Marsella, G. DeVos, & EL.K. Hsu (Eds.), Culture and self. Asian and Western perspectives (pp. 281-307). London: Tavistock.
30.
Marsella, A. J. , DeVos, G., & Hsu, F.L.K. (Eds.). (1985). Culture and self: Asian and Western perspectives. London: Tavistock.
31.
Miller, J. G. (1988). Bridging the content-structure dichotomy: Culture and the self. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The cross-cultural challenge to social psychology (pp. 266-281). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32.
Mines, M. (1981). Indian transitions: A comparative analysis of adult stages of development. Ethos, 9, 95-121.
33.
Roland, A. (1987). The familial self, the individualized self, and the transcendent self: Psychoanalytic reflections on India and America. Psychoanalytic Review, 74, 237-250.
34.
Roseman, I. J. , Dhawan, N., Rettek, S. I., Naidu, R. K., &Thapa, K. (1995). Cultural differences and cross-cultural similarities in appraisals and emotional responses. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 26, 23-48.
35.
Strauss, J. , & Goethals, G. R. (Eds.). (1991). The self Interdisciplinary approaches. New York: Springer-Verlag.
36.
Stryker, S. (1991). Exploring the relevance of social cognition for the relationship of self and society: Linking the cognitive perspective and identity theory. In J. A. Howard & P. L. Callero (Eds.), The self-society dynamic: Cognition, emotion, and action (pp. 19-41). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Suls, J. (Ed.). (1982). Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38.
Suls, J. , & Greenwald, A. G. (Eds.). (1983). Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
Tavris, C. , & Wade, C. (1984). The longest war: Sex differences in perspective. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
40.
Triandis, H. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.
41.
Triandis, H. , McCusker, C., & Hui, C. H. (1990). Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1006-1020.
42.
Wegner, D. M. , & Vallacher, R. R. (Eds.). (1980). The self in social psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
43.
Yardley, K. , & Honess, T. (Eds.). (1987). Self and identity: Psychosocialperspectives. New York: Wiley.
44.
Ziller, R. C. , Long, B. H., Ramana, K. V., & Reddy, V. E. (1968). Self-other orientations of Indian and American adolescents. Journal of Personality, 36, 315-330.
