In order to study possible differential effects of language on reasoning and to control educational factors, bilingual subjects of two linguistic origins (Chinese and South Indian) studying in the same university were asked to solve two-term deductions between quantified sentences in their second language (English or Malay). No systematic differences were observed between subjects whose native languages were different nor between subjects reasoning in different languages. Thus no support was provided for Whorl's hypothesis. The opposing hypothesis, however, received support, that is, that the interpretation of quantified sentences is based on universal grammatical and pragmatic factors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Begg, I. , & Harris, G. (1982). On the interpretation of syllogisms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 595-620.
2.
Brown, C. , Keats, J. A., Keats, D. M., & Seggie, I. (1980). Reasoning about implication. A comparison of Malaysian and Australian subjects. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 11, 395-410.
3.
Castellan, N. J., Jr. (1965). On the partitioning of contingency tables. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 330-338.
4.
Dawe, L. (1983). Bilingualism and mathematical reasoning in English as a second language. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14, 324-353.
5.
Feldman, S. S. (1972). Children's understanding of negation as a logical operator. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 85, 3-49.
6.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics. Vol. 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press.
7.
Horn, L. N. (1972). On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
8.
Kim, K. J. (1985). Development of the concept of truth-functional negation. Developmental Psychology, 21, 462-472.
9.
Newstead, S. E. , & Griggs, R. A. (1983). Drawing inferences from quantified statements: A study of the square of opposition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 534-546.
10.
Politzer, G. (1986). Laws of language use and formal logic. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 47-92.
11.
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought and reality. New York: Wiley.
12.
Zepp, R. (1983). A West-African replication of the four-card problem. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14, 323-327.
13.
Zepp, R. , Monin, J., & Lei, L. (1987). Common logical errors in English and Chinese. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18, 1-17.
