Two experiments examined whether the attributions people made about others from their own or another culture were subject to a positivity bias, and whether these attributions were affected by a positive in-group bias. In Experiment 1, a Japanese sample made attributions to a person from Japan, the United States, or the Third World who was either promoted or demoted. In Experiment 2, a sample from the United States and the Third World made attributions to a person from the United States or the Third World who was either promoted or demoted. The attributions were not subject to a positive in-group bias. However, the attributions made by the Japanese, Americans, and people from the Third World evidenced a positivity bias, although with cultural variation on the measures on which it was obtained.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bond, M. H. (1986). A proposal for cross-cultural studies of attribution. In M. Hewstone (Ed.), Attribution theory: Extensions and applications (pp. 744-757). Oxford: Blackwells.
2.
Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
3.
Condon, J. (1984). With respect to the Japanese. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
4.
Elig, T. W. , & Frieze, I. H. (1979). Measuring causal attributions for success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 621-634.
5.
Inkeles, A. (1983). The third century. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
6.
Kashima, Y. , & Triandis, H. C. (1986). The self-serving bias in attributions as a coping strategy: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17, 83-97.
7.
Kurian, G. T. (1982). Encyclopedia of the Third World (rev. ed.). New York: Facts on File, Inc.
8.
Lannoy, R. (1971). The speaking tree: A study of Indian culture and society. London: Oxford University Press.
9.
Pettigrew, T. F. (1979). The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport's cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 461-476.
10.
Sears, D. O. (1983). The person-positivity bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 233-250.
11.
Smith, S. H. , & Whitehead, G. 1., III. (1984). Attributions for promotion and demotion in the United States and India. Journal of Social Psychology, 124, 27-34.
12.
Smith, S. H. , Whitehead, G. 1., III, & Sussman, N. M. (1984). Perception of female and male success in the United States and Third World nations. Sex Roles, 10, 903-911.
13.
Taub, R. P. (1969). Bureaucrats under stress: Administrator and administration in an Indian state. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
14.
Taub, R. P. , & Taub, D. (1983). Entrepreneurship in a socialist state: Small scale industries in India. Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago.
15.
Taylor, D. M. , & Jaggi, V. (1974). Ethnocentrism and causal attribution in a South Indian context. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5, 162-171.
16.
Taylor, S. E. , & Fiske, S. T. (1975). Point of view and perceptions of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 439-445.
17.
Taylor, S. E. , & Koivumaki, J. H. (1976). The perception of self and others: Acquaintance-ship, affect, and actor-observer differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 403-408.
18.
Watkins, D. (1982). Causal attributions for achievement of Filipino barrio children. Journal of Social Psychology, 118, 149-156.
19.
Weiner, B. , Frieze, I., Kukla, A., Reed, L., Rest, S., & Rosenbaum, R. M. (1972). Perceiving the causes of success and failure. In E. E. Joneset al. (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 95-120). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
20.
Weisz, J. R. , Rothbaum, F. M., & Blackburn, T. C. (1984). Standing out and standing in: The psychology of control in America and Japan. American Psychologist, 39, 955-969.
21.
Whitehead, G. I., III , Andersen, W. F., & Mitchell, K. D. (1987). Children's causal attributions to self and other as a function of outcome and task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 192-194.
22.
Whitehead, G. I., III , & Smith, S. H. (1985). The effects of subject's race, defendant's race, and status on sentencing judgments. Contemporary Social Psychology, 10, 51-52.
23.
Whitehead, G. I., III , Smith, S. H., & Eichhorn, J. A. (1982). The effect of subject's race and other's race on judgments of causality for success and failure. Journal of Personality, 50, 193-202.
24.
Wilkins, E. J. , & deCharms, R. (1962). Authoritarianism and response to power cues. Journal of Personality, 30, 439-457.
