Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Two studies were conducted to examine the relationship between the dimension of individualism versus collectivism and psychological needs. In the first study Chinese subjects in Hong Kong completed an Individualism-Collectivism Scale and the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule. Collectivism was found to be positively related to the needs for affiliation, succorance, abasement, and nurturance and negatively related to the needs for autonomy, deference, and heterosexuality. In the second study, American subjects in Illinois responded to several scales from the Personality Research Form, (PRF) and a collection of items constructed to measure collectivism. A factor labeled Self-reiliance Versus Interdependence held significant correlations with the autonomy need. It was negatively associated with needs for abasement, affiliation, nurturance, succorance, and desirability, as measured by the PRF. The similarity of correlational patterns observed among Hong Kong Chinese subjects and Illinois subjects suggested that there was some generality in the findings.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Azuma, H. (1984). Secondary control as a heterogeneous category. American Psychologist, 39, 970-971.

Crandall, J. E. (1975). A scale for social interest. Journal of Individual Psychology, 31, 187-195.

Edwards, A. L. (1959). Edwards Personal Preference Schedule. New York: Psychological Corporation.

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Hsu, F. L. K. (1981). American and Chinese: Passage to difference (3rd ed.). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Hui, C. H. (1988). Measurement of individualism-collectivism. Journal of Research in Personality, 22, 17-36.

Hui, C. H. , & Triandis, H. C. (1986). Individualism-collectivism: A study of cross-cultural researchers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17, 225-248.

Jackson, D. N. (1974). Personality Research Form manual. Goshen, NY: Research Psychologists Press.

Jacob, T. (1975) Family interaction in disturbed and normal families: A methodological and substantive review. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 33-65.

10.

Johnson, R. T. , & Johnson, D. W. (1981). Building friendships between handicapped and non-handicapped students: Effects of cooperative and individualistic instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 18, 415-423.

11.

Johnson, R. T. , & Johnson, D. W. (1982) Effects of cooperative and competitive learning experiences on interpersonal attraction between handicapped and non-handicapped students. Journal of Social Psychology, 116, 211-219.

12.

Johnson, R. T. , Johnson, D. W. , & Rynders, J. (1981). Effect of cooperative, competitive and individualistic experiences on self-esteem of handicapped and nonhandicapped students. Journal of Social Psychology, 108, 31-34.

13.

Moos, R. H. , & Moos, B. S. (1976). A typology of family social environments. Family Process, 15, 357-371.

14.

Munro, D. (1985). A free-format values inventory: Explorations with Zimbabwean student teachers. South African Journal of Psychology 15, 33-41.

15.

Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.

16.

Sampson, E. E. (1985). The decentralization of identity: Toward a revised concept of personal and social order. American Psychologist, 40, 1203-1211.

17.

Smith, K. Johnson, D. W. , & Johnson, R. T. (1982). Effects of cooperative and individualistic instruction on achievement of handicapped, regular and gifted students. Journal of Social Psychology, 116, 277-283.

18.

Spence, J. T. (1985). Achievement American style: The rewards and costs of individualism. American vs. idiocentric social behavior: A major cultural difference between Hispanics and the Mainstream (Tech. Rep. No. ONR-16). Urbana: University of Illinois, Department of Psychology.

19.

Triandis, H. C. (in press). Collectivism vs. individualism: A reconceptualization of a basic concept in cross-cultural psychology. In C. Bagley & G. K. Verma (Eds.), Personality, cognition, and value: Cross-cultural perspectives of childhood and adolescence. London: Macmillan.

20.

Triandis, H. C. , Bontempo, R. , & Villareal, M. J. (1987). Probing individualism and collectivism. Manuscript submitted for publication.

21.

Triandis, H.C. , Leung, K. , Villareal, M. J. , & Clark, F. L. (1985). Allocentric vs. idiocentric tendencies: Convergent and discriminant validation. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 395-415.

22.

Waterman, A. S. (1984). The psychology of individualism. New York: Praeger.

23.

Watts, A. (1972). The book: On the taboo against knowing who you are. New York: Vintage Books.

24.

Yang, K. S. (1978). Beyond David McClelland's conception of achievement motivation. Paper presented at the conference of the Hong Kong Psychological Society, Hong Kong.

Individualism-Collectivism and Pyschological Needs

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References