This investigation examined Japanese and American children's styles of processing computerized geometric matrices with a true/false and 1-3 elements and 0-2 transformations. Effectiveness of training in visual animation/construction or in verbal labeling was also considered. Prior to training, the 209 Japanese and American 7-, 10-, and 13-year-olds completed the Raven's Progressive Matrices and tests of perceptual reasoning and spatial relations. No outstanding differences were apparent. However, on the test of 108 figural matrices, speed/accuracy trade-off decisions differed for the two cultures. In contrast to American children, Japanese children's error decrease was accompanied by relatively little latency increase between the ages of 7and 10. This finding is attributed to Japanese children's expeditious style of considering task-related information. Moreover, this Japanese style appears to temper traditional gender differences in effectiveness of visual versus verbal training and in encoding spatial rotations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Azuma, H. (1984). Psychology in a non-Western country. International Journal of Psychology, 19, 45-55.
2.
Bond, M. H. , & Tornatzsky, L. G. (1973). Locus of control in students from Japan and the United States: Dimensions and levels of response. Psychologia, 16, 209-213.
3.
Brown, A. L. , & DeLoache, J. S. (1978). Skills, plans, and self-regulation. In R. S. Siegler (Ed.), Children's thinking: What develops? (pp. 3-36). New York: Wiley.
4.
Cronbach, L. J. , & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods. New York: Irvington Press.
5.
Dickson, W. P. , Miyake, N., & Muto, T. (1977). Referential relativity: Culture-boundedness of analytic and metaphoric communication. Cognition, 5, 215-233.
6.
Evans, H. M. (1981). Internal-external locus of control and word association: Research with Japanese and American students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 12, 372-382.
7.
Foorman, B. R. , & Kinoshita, Y. (1983). Linguistic effects on children's encoding and decoding performance in Japan, the United States, and England. Child Development, 54, 69-77.
8.
Foorman, B. R. , Sadowski, B. R., & Basen, J. A. (1985). Children's solutions for figural matrices: Developmental differences in strategies and effects of matrix characteristics. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 107-130.
9.
Hess, R. D. , Azuma, H., Kashiwagi, K., Dickson, W. P., Nagano, S., Holloway, S., Miyake, K., Price, G., Hatano, G., & McDevitt, T. (1986). Family influences on school readiness and achievement in Japan and the United States: An overview of a longitudinal study. In H. W. Stevenson, H. Azuma, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan. New York: W. H. Freeman.
10.
Lewis, C. (1984). Cooperation and control in Japanese nursery schools. Comparative Education Review, 28, 69-84.
11.
Lynn, R. (1982). IQ in Japan and the United States shows a growing disparity. Nature, 297, 222-223.
12.
Maccoby, E. E. , & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13.
Mahler, I. (1974). A comparative study of locus of control. Psychologia, 17, 135-138.
14.
McGinnies, E. I. , Nordholm, C., Ward, C. D., & Bhanthumnavin, D. (1974). Sex and cultural differences in perceived locus of control among students in five countries. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 451-455.
15.
Mulholland, T. M. , Pellegrino, J. W., & Glaser, R. (1980). Components of geometric analogy solution. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 252-284.
16.
Parsons, O. A. , & Schneider, J. M. (1974). Locus of control in university students from Eastern and Western societies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 456-461.
17.
Pascual-Leone, Y. (1969). The Figural Intersection Test. Toronto: York University.
18.
Pellegrino, J. W. , & Glaser, R. (1982). Analyzing aptitudes for learning: Inductive reasoning. In R. Glaser (Ed.),Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 269-345). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19.
Raven, J. C. (1956). Standard Progressive Matrices. London: Lewis.
20.
Salkind, N. J. , Kojima, H., & Zelniker, T. (1978). Cognitive tempo in American, Japanese, and Israeli children. Child Development, 49, 1024-1027.
21.
Siegler, R. S. (1978). The origins of scientific reasoning. In R. S. Siegler (Ed.), Children's thinking: What develops? (pp. 109-150). New York: Wiley.
22.
Smith, J. D. , & Caplan, J. (1988). Cultural differences in cognitive style development. Developmental Psychology, 24, 46-52.
23.
Snow, R. E. (1980). Aptitude processes. In R. Snow, P. A. Federico, & W. Montague (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24.
Sternberg, R. J. , & Nigro, G. (1980). Developmental patterns in the solution of verbal analogies. Child Development, 51, 27-38.
25.
Sternberg, R. J. , & Rifkin, B. (1979). The development of analogical reasoning processes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 27, 195-237.
26.
Stevenson, H. W. , Azuma, H., & Hakuta, K. (Eds.). (1986). Child development and education in Japan. New York: W. H. Freeman.
27.
Stevenson, H. W. , Lee, S., & Stigler, J. W. (1986). Mathematics achievement of Chinese, Japanese, and American children. Science, 231, 693-699.
28.
Stevenson, H. W. , Stigler, J. W., & Lee, S. (1986). Achievement in mathematics. In H. W. Stevenson, H. Azuma, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan. New York: W. H. Freeman.
29.
Stone, B. , & Day, M. C. (1981). A developmental study of the processes underlying solution of figural matrices. Child Development, 52, 359-362.
30.
Thurstone, L. L. , & Thurstone, T. G. (1949). Primary Mental Abilities Test. Chicago: Science Research Associates.
31.
Weisz, J. R. , Rothbaum, F. M., & Blackburn, T. C. (1984). Standing out and standing in: The psychology of control in America and Japan. American Psychologist, 39, 955-969.
