Using both free-response and ratings methods, we investigated the effects of language of data collection on healthy personality concepts obtained from Filipino bilinguals. We found substantial comparability in Filipino college students' healthy personality concepts as elicited by Tagalog (a native language)and English free-response questionnaires. Importance ratings of equivalent Tagalog and English characteristics for healthy personality were also similar. Some consistent language differences were found across the two methods, and some of these support a cross-cultural accommodation interpretation of language effects (i.e., that language differences reflect underlying cultural value differences). Greater diversity and refinement of healthy personality concepts were provided in the native language. However, because healthy personality concepts in the two languages did not totally overlap, use of both languages may be advantageous for comprehensive personality descriptions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bond, M. H. , & Yang, K. S. (1982). Ethnic affirmation versus cross-cultural accommodation: The variable impact of questionnaire language on Chinese bilinguals in Honk Kong. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13, 169-185.
2.
Botha, E. (1970). The effect of language on values expressed by bilinguals. Journal of Social Psychology, 80, 143-145.
3.
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185-216.
4.
Bulatao, J. C. (1962). Philippine values: The Manileno's mainsprings. Philippine Studies, 10 (1), 48-81.
5.
Bulatao, R. A. (1973). Measures of happiness among Manila residents. Philippine Sociological Review, 21 (4), 229-238.
6.
Church, A. T. (1985). Filipino personality: A review of writings and research (Monograph Series No. 6). Manila: De La Salle University Press.
7.
Church, A. T. (1987). Personality research in a non-Western culture: The Philippines. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 272-292.
8.
Earle, M. J. (1969). A cross-cultural and cross-language comparison of dogmatism scores. Journal of Social Psychology, 79, 19-24.
9.
Enriquez, V. G. (1977). Filipino psychology in the Third World. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 10 (1), 3-18.
10.
Enriquez, V. G. , & Brislin, R. W. (1977). The measurement of affective content in translation and interpretation: American English and Filipino. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 10 (t1), 55-69.
11.
Ervin, S. (1964). Language and TAT content in bilinguals. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 500-507.
12.
Feldman, R.H.L. (1975). The effect of administrator and language on traditional-modern attitudes among Gussi students in Kenya. Journal of Social Psychology, 96, 141-142.
13.
Gavino, J. A. (1968). A comparison of responses to personality test items of English-speaking Filipinos in English and in Pilipino. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 1 (1), 68-70.
14.
Guthrie, G. M. (1970). Thepsychology of modernization in the rural Philippines (IPC Papers No. 8). Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.
15.
Guthrie, G. M. , & Azores, F. M. (1968). Philippine interpersonal behaviorpatterns. In W. F. Bello & A. de Guzman II (Eds.), Modernization: Its impact in the Philippines III (IPC Papers No. 6). Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.
16.
Guthrie, G. M. , & Bennett, A. B., Jr. (1971). Cultural differences in implicit personality theory. International Journal of Psychology, 6 (4), 305-312.
17.
Guthrie, G. M. , & Jacobs, P. J. (1966). Child rearing and personality development in the Philippines. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
18.
Lapuz, L. V. (1978). A study of psychopathology. Quezon City: New Day. (Originally published 1973, University of the Philippines Press.)
19.
Lynch, F. (1973). Social acceptance reconsidered. In F. Lynch & A. de Guzman II (Eds.), Four readings on Philippine values (4th ed., enlarged, IPC Papers No. 2). Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.
20.
Lynch, F. , & Makil, P. Q. (1968). The BRAC 1967 Filipino family survey. Saint Louis Quarterly, 6 (3-4), 293-330.
21.
Marin, G. , Triandis, H. C., Betancourt, H., & Kashima, Y. (1983). Ethnic affirmation versus social desirability: Explaining discrepancies in bilinguals' responses to a questionnaire. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14 (2), 173-186.
22.
Nydegger, W. F. , & Nydegger, C. (1963). Tarong: An Ilocos barrio in the Philippines. In B. B. Whiting (Ed.), Six cultures: Studies in child rearing. New York: John Wiley.
23.
Pascasio, E. M. (Ed.). (1977). The Filipino bilingual: Studies on Philippine bilingualism and bilingual education. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.
24.
Sollee, N. D. (1970). A study of perceptual defense involving bilinguals. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 3 (1), 3-17.
25.
Taylor, D. M. , Dagot, E. P., & Gardner, R. C. (1969). The use of the semantic differential in cross-cultural research. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 2 (1), 43-51.
26.
Tinsley, H.E.A. , & Weiss, D. J. (1975). Inter rater reliability and agreement of subjective judgments. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 22 (4), 358-376.
27.
Ventura, E. R. (1976). Ambiguity values of the Philippine Thematic Apperception Test. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 9 (1-2), 39-56.
28.
Yang, K. S. , & Bond, M. H. (1980). Ethnic affirmation by Chinese bilinguals. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 11, 411-425.
