Emic and imposed-etic strategies were applied to the assessment of intelligence in rural Philippine children. Emic (culture-specific) measures assessed children's "intelligence" as conceptualized by rural adults. We concluded that Western-type (imposed-etic) tests measure a concept of intelligence that only partially overlaps emic conceptions. The imposed-etic measures were better than the emic measures as predictors of school performance, which could be viewed as an imposed-etic criterion. Most indigenous (emic) competencies showed no relationship to school performance. Thus what is "intelligent" in everyday barrio functioning ("everyday intelligence') is distinct from "academic intelligence."
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berry, J. W. (1969). On cross-cultural comparability. International Journal of Psychology, 4, 119-128.
2.
Berry, J. W. (1984). Towards a universal psychology of cognitive competence. International Journal of Psychology, 19, 335-361.
3.
Bhatia, C. M. (1955). Performance tests of intelligence under Indian conditions. London: Oxford University Press.
4.
Biesheuvel, S. (1969). Psychological tests and their application to non-European peoples. In D. R. Price-Williams (Ed.), Cross-cultural studies. Middlesex: Penguin.
5.
Biesheuvel, S. (1972). Adaptability: Its measurement and determinants. In L. J. Cronbach & P.J.D. Drenth (Eds.), Mental tests and cultural adaptation (pp. 47-62). The Hague: Mouton.
6.
Chen, M. J. , Braithwaite, V., & Huang, J. R. (1982). Attributes of intelligent behavior: Perceived relevance and difficulty by Australian and Chinese students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13, 139-156.
7.
Church, A. T. , & Katigbak, M. S. (1988). The emic strategy in the identification and assessment of personality dimensions in a non-Western culture: Rationale, steps, and a Philippine illustration. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 19 (2), 140-163.
8.
Church, A. T. , Katigbak, M. S., & Almario-Velazco, G. (1985). Psychometric intelligence and adaptive competence in rural Philippine childrenIntelligence, 9, 317-340.
9.
Cronbach, L. J. , & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
10.
Irvine, S. H. (1983). Testing in Africa and America: The search for routes. In S. H. Irvine & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Human assessment and cultural factors (pp. 45-58). New York: Plenum.
11.
Irvine, S. H. , & Berry, J. W. (Eds.). (1983). Human assessment and culturalfactors. New York: Plenum.
12.
Irwin, M. , Klein, R. E., Engle, P. L., Yarbrough, C., & Nerlove, S. B. (1977). The problem of establishing validity in cross-cultural measurements. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 285, 308-325.
13.
Klein, R. E. , Freeman, J. E., & Millet, R. (1973). Psychological test performance and indigenous conceptions of intelligence. Journal of Psychology, 84, 219-222.
14.
McCleliand, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for "intelligence."American Psychologist, 28, 1-14.
15.
Ord, I. G. (1971). Mental tests for pre-literates: Resulting mainly from New Guinea studies. London: Ginn.
16.
Stemnberg, R. J. (1984). A contextualist view of the nature of intelligence. International Journal of Psychology, 19, 307-334.
17.
Sternberg, R. J. , Conway, B., Ketron, N., & Bernstein, M. (1981). People's conceptions of intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 37-55.
18.
Super, C. M. (1983). Cultural variation in the meaning and uses of children's "intelligence." In J. Deregowski, S. Dziurawiec, & R. Annis (Eds.), Expiscations in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 199-212). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
19.
Wober, M. (1972). Culture and the concept of intelligence. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 3, 327-328.
