The rationale for, and steps for executing, an emic (culture-specific) strategy in the identification and assessment of personality dimensions in non-Western cultures is discussed. We argue that the emic strategy has been underused, and that it best precedes attempts to demonstrate cross-cultural(etic) links or generalities. Four steps in the emic strategy are described: (1) identification of emic concepts, (2) generation of culture-relevant items to assess emic concepts,(3) emic validation of emic dimensions, and (4) relating emic and imposed-etic dimensions in a search for etic or universal dimensions. In a Philippine illustration of these steps, emic personality dimensions (scales) tapping Filipino college students' emic concepts of healthy personality showed variable links to existing U.S. personality dimensions, which in turn showed only fair generalizability to the Philippine setting.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ajzen, I. , & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888-918.
2.
Ailport, G. W. , & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psychological study. Psychological Monographs, 47 (1, Whole No. 211).
3.
Berry, J. W. (1969). On cross-cultural comparability. International Journal of Psychology, 4, 119-128.
4.
Berry, J. W. (1984). Towards a universal psychology of cognitive competence. International Journal of Psychology, 19, 335-361.
5.
Bertelson, A. D. , Marks, P. A., & May, G. D. (1982). MMPI and race: A controlled - study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 316-318.
6.
Bijnen, E. J. , Van Der Net, T.Z.J., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1986). On cross-cultural comparative studies with the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17, 3-16.
7.
Bond, M. H. , & Yang, K. S. (1982). Ethnic affirmation versus cross-cultural accommodation: The variable impact of questionnaire language on Chinese bilinguals in Hong Kong. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology13, 169-185.
8.
Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Vol 2. Methodology (pp. 389-444). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
9.
Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 136-164). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10.
Brislin, R. W. , Lonner, W. J., & Thorndike, R. M. (1973). Cross-cultural research methods. New York: John Wiley.
11.
Bulatao, J. C. (1964). Hiya. Philippine Studies, 12, 424-438.
12.
Butcher, J. N. , & Pancheri, P. (Eds.). (1976). A handbook of cross-national MMPI research. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
13.
Campbell, D. T. , & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
14.
Cattell, R. B. (1946). Description and measurement of personality. Yonkers, NY: World Book.
15.
Cattell, R. B. (1957). Personality and motivation structure and measurement. Yonkers, NY: World Book.
16.
Church, A. T. (1987). Personality research in a non-Western culture: The Philippines. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 272-292.
17.
Church, A. T. , Katigbak, M. S., & Castaneda, I. (1984-85). Conceptions of good psychological health and personality functioning of Filipino college students: A multimethod investigation. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 17-18, 15-43.
18.
Church, A. T. , Katigbak, M. S., & Castanleda, I. (1988). The effects of language of data collection on derived conceptions of healthy personality with Filipino bilinguals. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 19 (2), 178-192.
19.
Clark, C. G. , & Miller, H. L. (1971). Validation of Gilberstadt and Duker's 8-6 profile type on a black sample. Psychological Reports, 29, 259-264.
20.
Cronbach, L. J. , & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological test. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
21.
Cross, D. T. , Barclay, A., & Burger, G. K. (1978). Differential effects of ethnic membership, sex and occupation on the California Psychological Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 42, 597-603.
22.
Dahlstrom, W. G. , Lachar, D., & Dahlstrom, L. E. (1986). MMPI patterns of American minorities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
23.
Doi, L. (1974). Amae: A key concept for understanding Japanese personality structure. In R. Levine (Ed.), Culture and personality. Chicago: Aldine.
24.
Enriquez, V. G. (1977). Filipino psychology in the Third World. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 10, 3-18.
25.
Enriquez, V. G. (1978). Kapwa: A core concept in Filipino social psychology. Philippine Social Sciences and Humanities Review, 42, 100-108.
26.
Enriquez, V. G. (1979). Towards cross-cultural knowledge through cross-indigenous methods and perspective. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 12, 9-15.
27.
Enriquez, V. G. (1982). Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Perspektibo at direksyon [Filipino psychology: Perspectives and directions]. In R. Pe-Pua (Ed.), Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Teorya, metodo at gamit (pp. 5-21). Quezon City: Philippine Psychology Research and Training House.
28.
Enriquez, V. G. , & Marcelino, E. P. (1984). Neo-colonial politics and language struggle in the Philippines: National consciousness and language in Philippine psychology. Quezon City: Akademyang Sikolohiyang Pilipino, Philippine Psychology Research and Training House.
29.
Eysenck, H. J. , & Eysenck, S.B.G. (1983). Recent advances in the cross-cultural study of personality. In J. N. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 41-69). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
Fiske, D. W. (1971). Measuring the concepts of personality. Chicago: Aldine.
31.
Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327-358.
32.
Goldberg, L. R. (1982). From ace to zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality. In C. D. Spielberger & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (pp. 203-234). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
Grigoroiu-Serbanescu, M. (1986). Factor structure and validation of the Junior Eysenck Personality Questionnaire based on a Romanian sample. International Journal of Psychology, 21, 141-151.
34.
Guilford, J. P. , & Zimmerman, W. S. (1949). Guilford-Zimmerman Temperament Survey Manual. Beverly Hills, CA: Sheridan Supply Co.
35.
Guthrie, G. M. , Jackson, D. N., Astilla, E., & Elwood, B. (1983). Personality measurement: Do the scale have similar meanings in another culture? In S. H. Irvine & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Human assessment and cultural factors (pp. 377-392). New York: Plenum.
36.
Guthrie, G. M. , & Lonner, W. J. (1986). Assessment of personality and psychopathology. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 231-264). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
37.
Gynther, M. D. (1972). White norms and Black MMPIs: A prescription for discrimination? Psychological Bulletin, 78, 386-402.
38.
Hathaway, S. R. , & McKinley, J. C. (1967). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Manual. New York: Psychological Corporation.
39.
Hui, C. H. , Drasgow, F., & Chang, B-H. (1983). Analysis of the Modernity Scale: An item response theory approach. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14, 259-278.
40.
Hui, C. H. , & Triandis, H. C. (1983). Multistrategy approach to cross-cultural research: The case of locus of control. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14, 65-83.
41.
Hui, C. H. , & Triandis, H. C. (1985). Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: A review and comparison of strategies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16, 131-152.
42.
Irvine, S. H. , & Carroll, W. K. (1980). Testing and assessment across cultures: Issues in methodology and theory. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 181-244). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
43.
Jackson, D. N. (1976). Jackson Personality Inventory Manual. Goshen, NY: Research Psychologists Press.
44.
Jackson, D. N. , Guthrie, G. M., Astilla, E., & Elwood, B. (1983). The cross-cultural generalizability of personality construct measures. In S. H. Irvine & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Human assessment and cultural factors (pp. 365-375). New York: Plenum.
45.
Jones, E. E. , & Zoppel, C. L. (1979). Personality differences among blacks in Jamaica and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 10, 435-456.
46.
Kameoka, V. A. (1985). Construct validation of psychological measures in cross-cultural research: Analysis of linear structural relationships. In R. Diaz Guerrero (Ed.), Cross-cultural and national studies in social psychology (pp. 57-68). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
47.
Katz, Y. J. , & Ronen, M. (1986). A cross-cultural validation of the Conservatism scale in a multi-ethnic society: The case of Israel. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 555-557.
48.
Kaut, C. R. (1961). Utang na loob: A system of contractual obligation among Tagalogs. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 17, 256-272.
49.
Lebra, T. S. (1969). Reciprocity and the asymmetric principle: An analytical reappraisal of the Japanese concept of on. Psychologia, 12, 129-138.
50.
Levin, J. , & Karni, E. S. (1970). Demonstration of cross-cultural invariance of the California Psychological Inventory in America and Israel by the Guttman-Lingoes smallest space analysis. Joumal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 253-260.
51.
Lonner, W. J. (1981). Psychological tests and intercultural counseling. In P. Pedersen, J. G. Draguns, W. J. Lonner, & J. E. Trimble (Eds.), Counseling across cultures (rev. ed., pp. 275-303). Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.
52.
Lynch, F. (1973). Social acceptance reconsidered. In F. Lynch & A. de Guzman II (Eds.), Four readings on Philippine values (4th ed., enlarged, IPC Papers No. 2, pp. 1-68). Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.
53.
Marin, G. , & Triandis, H. C. (1985). Allocentrism as an important characteristic of the behavior of Latin Americans and Hispanics. In R. Diaz Guerrero (Ed.), Cross-cultural and national studies in social psychology (pp. 85-104). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
54.
Marin, G. , Triandis, H. C., Betancourt, H., & Kashima, Y. (1983). Ethnic affirmation versus social desirability: Explaining discrepancies in bilinguals' responses to a questionnaire. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14, 173-186.
55.
Mataragnon, R. H. (1977). A conceptual and psychological analysis of sumpong. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 10, 45-53.
56.
Maznah, I. , & Choo, P. F. (1986). The factor structure of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory (BSRI). International Journal of Psychology, 21, 31-41.
57.
Miller, J. , Slomczynski, K. M., & Schuenberg, R. J. (1981). Assessing comparability of measurement in cross-national research: Authoritarian-conservatism in different sociocultural settings. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 178-191.
58.
Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: John Wiley.
59.
Niles, F. S. (1981). Dimensionality of Rotter's I-E Scale in Sri Lanka. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 12, 473-479.
60.
Passini, F. T. , & Norman, W. T. (1966). A universal conception of personality structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 44-49.
61.
Pritchard, D. A. , & Rosenblatt, A. (1980). Racial bias in the MMPI: A methodological review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology48, 263-267.
62.
Smith, C. P. , & Graham, J. R. (1981). Behavioral correlates for the MMPI standard F scale and for a modified F scale for black and white psychiatric patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 455-459.
63.
Spinks, P. M. (1983). A preliminary culture-specific personality scale. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14, 201-219.
64.
Sundberg, N. D. , & Gonzales, L. R. (1981). Cross-cultural and cross-ethnic assessment: Overview and issues. In P. McReynolds (Ed.), Advances in psychological assessment (Vol. 5, pp. 460-541). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
65.
Tellegen, A. (1982). Brief manual for the Differential Personality Questionnaire. Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota.
66.
Triandis, H. C. (1972). The analysis of subjective culture. New York: John Wiley.
67.
Triandis, H. C. , & Marin, G. (1983). Etic plus emic versus pseudoetic: A test of abasic assumption of contemporary cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14, 489-500.
68.
Triandis, H. C. , Marin, G., Lisansky, J., & Betancourt, H. (1984). Simpatia as a cultural script of Hispanics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1363-1375.
69.
Trimble, J. E. , Lonner, W. J., & Boucher, J. (1983). Stalking the wily emic. In S. H. Irvine & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Human assessment and cultural factors (pp. 259-273). New York: Plenum.
70.
Tsujioka, B. , & Cattell, R. B. (1965). A cross-cultural comparison of second-stratum questionnaire personality factor structures-anxiety and extroversion, in America and Japan. Journal of Social Psychology, 65, 205-219.
