Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

An ecological hypothesis related to the Ponzo illusion is that people who show a large susceptibility are misapplying cues that are valid in their natural environments with which they have everyday experience. Past cross-cultural research supporting this hypothesis has been based on two-dimensional stimuli. A better test of the hypothesis would be based on judgments of three-dimensional, natural-world stimuli. Judges from urbanized areas in the United States (N = 21), from the Pacific islands (N = 21), and from urbanized areas in the Philippines (N = 10) viewed a three-dimensional version of the Ponzo illusion from a distance of 13.20 m. As predicted, Pacific Islanders showed less susceptibility to the illusion than judges from either of the two other two groups.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BORING, E. (1942) Sensation and Perception in the History of Experimental Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

BRISLIN, R. (1974) "The Ponzo illusion: additional cues, age, orientation, and culture." J. of Cross-Cultural Psychology 5: 139-161.

BRISLIN, R. and H. LEIBOWITZ (1970) "The effect of separation between test and comparison objects on size constancy at various age levels." Amer. J. of Psychology 83: 372-376.

BRISLIN, R. , W. LONNER , and R. THORNDIKE (1973) Cross-Cultural Research Methods. New York: John Wiley.

CAMPBELL, D. (1964) "Distinguishing differences of perception from failures of communication in cross-cultural studies," pp. 308-336 in F. Northrop and H. Livingston (eds.) Cross-Cultural Understanding: Epistemology in Anthropology. New York: Harper & Row.

DEREGOWSKI, J. (forthcoming) "Perception," in H. Triandis and W. Lonner (eds.) Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology, vol. 2. Boston: Ailyn & Bacon.

GREGORY, R. (1966) Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing. New York: McGraw-Hill.

HANLEY, C. , and D. ZERBOLIO (1965) "Developmental changes in five illusions measured by the up-and-down method." Child Development 36: 437-452.

HUDSON, W. (1960) "Pictorial depth perception in sub-cultural groups in Africa." J. of Social Psychology 52: 183-208.

10.

KILBRIDE, P. , and H. LEIBOWITZ (1976) "The Ponzo illusion among the Baganda of Uganda," in L. Loeb Adler (ed.) Conference on Issues in Cross-Cultural Research. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

11.

LEIBOWITZ, H. and J. JUDISCH (1967) "The relation between age and magnitude of the Ponzo illusion." Amer. J. of Psychology 80: 105-109.

12.

LEIBOWITZ, H. , and H. PICK (1972) "Cross-cultural and educational aspects of the Ponzo illusion." Proceedings of the Twentieth International Congress of Psychology, Tokyo. (also in Perception and Psychophysics, 1972, 12:430-432)

13.

LEIBOWITZ, H. , S. POLLARD , and D. DICKSON (1967) "Monocular and binocular size matching as a function of distance at various age levels." Amer. J. of Psychology 80: 263-268.

14.

LEIBOWITZ, H. , R. BRISLIN , L. PERLMUTTER , and R. HENNESSY (1969) "Ponzo perspective illusion as a manifestation of space perception." Science 166: 1174-1176.

15.

MASON, L. (1968) "The ethnology of Micronesia," pp. 275-298 in A. Vayda (ed.) Peoples and Cultures of the Pacific. Garden City, N.Y.: Natural History Press.

16.

MILLER, R. (1973) "Cross-cultural research in the perception of pictorial materials." Psych. Bull. 80: 135-150.

17.

SEGALL, M. , D. CAMPBELL , and M. HERSKOVITS (1966) The Influence of Culture on Visual Perception. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

18.

SERPELL, R. (1976) Culture's Influence on Behaviour. London: Methuen.

19.

VAYDA, A. [ed.] (1968) Peoples and Cultures of the Pacific. Garden City, N.Y.: Natural History Press.

Cultural Differences in the Perception of a Three-Dimensional Ponzo Illusion

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References