Universality and Distinctiveness in Dimensions of Japanese Person Perception

Abstract

Dimensions of Japanese person perception were assessed using Norman's (1963) method and stimulus materials. These dimensions were then compared statistically with results from similar studies involving subjects from the United States and from the Philippines. Students from Japan and the United States grouped the same behaviors into the five factors of extroversion, good-naturedness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, and culture. For all three subject populations, the same behavior descriptions were grouped together to form the high variance dimensions of extroversion, good-naturedness, and conscientiousness. The factors of emotional stability and culture, however, appear to be construed in culturally specific ways. Differences in the relative strength of the first three factors across the three cultures were discussed with the prominence of the extroversion factor in Japan being related to the importance of relative status in Japanese society.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BOND, M. H. and D. SHIRAISHI (1974) "The effect of body lean and status of an interviewer on the non-verbal behavior of Japanese interviewees." International J. of Psychology 9: 117-128.

BOND, M. H. and L. G. TORNATSKY (1973) "Locus of control in students from Japan and the United States: dimensions and levels of response." Psychologia 16: 209-213.

BRISLIN, R. W. (1970) "Back-translation for cross-cultural research." J. of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1: 185-216.

GUTHRIE, G. M. (1970) The Psychology of Modernization in the Rural Philippines. Quezon City, Philippines: Ateno de Manila Univ. Press.

GUTHRIE, G. M. and A. B. BENNETT (1971) "Cultural differences in implicit personality theory." International J. of Psychology 6: 305-312.

HARMAN, H. H. (1960) Modern Factor Analysis. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

IIJIMA, F. (1961) "A factorial study on cognitive structures of inter-personal perception." Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association: 455.

KELLY, G. A. (1963) A Theory of Personality. New York: W. W. Norton.

NAKANE, C. (1970) Japanese Society. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.

10.

NAKAZATO, H. , M. H. BOND , and D. SHIRAISHI (1974) "Dimensions of personality perception." Kwansei Gakuin University. (unpublished, in Japanese)

11.

NORMAN, W. T. (1963) "Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes. Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings." J. of Abnormal and Social Psychology 66: 574-583.

12.

OSGOOD, C. E. , G. J. SUCI , and P. H. TANNENBAUM (1957) The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.

13.

PASSINI, F. T. and W. T. NORMAN (1966) "A universal conception of personality structure?" J. of Personality and Social Psychology 4: 44-49.

14.

PETERSON, D. R. (1967) "Uses and limitation of factor analysis on cross-cultural research on socialization." International J. of Psychology 2: 215-220.

15.

TRIANDIS, H. C. (1972) "A review of the psychological dimensions of modernization." Presented at the International Congress of Psychology, Tokyo.

16.

TRIANDIS, H. C. , Y. TANAKA , and A. V. SHANMUGAM (1966) "Interpersonal attitudes among American, Indian, and Japanese students." International J. of Psychology 1: 177-206.

17.

TRIANDIS, H. C. , V. VASSILIOU , G. VASSILIOU , Y. TANAKA , and A. V. SHANMUGAM (1972) The Analysis of Subjective Culture. New York: John Wiley.

18.

SHAW, M. E. and S. IWAWAKI (1972) "Attribution of responsibility by Japanese and Americans as a function of age." J. of Cross-Cultural Psychology 3: 71-81.