Extreme Response Style in Cross-Cultural Research

Abstract

The neglect of the consequences of the Extreme Response Style (ERS) phenomenon in cross-cultural research is documented through a selective literature review. Consideration of ERS differences permitted derivation of three logical consequences that pertain to (a) differences in group means, (b) the internal consistency of measures and the correlation among measures, and (c) results of dimensional analyses. Comparison of U.S. and Korean student samples on a 1 30-item questionnaire revealed stronger ERS in the U.S. sample. Furthermore, the predictions derived from ERS differences were confirmed, thus demonstrating the credibility of the ERS argument. General implications of ERS for cross-cultural research are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BRENGELMANN, J. C. (1959) "Differences in questionnaire responses between English and German nationals." Acta Psychologica 16: 339-355.

BRISLIN, R. W. , W. J. LONNER , and R. M. THORNDIKE (1973) Cross-cultural Research Methods. New York: John Wiley.

CRANDALL, J. E. (1973) "Sex differences in extreme response style: differences in frequency of use of extreme positive and negative ratings." J. of Social Psychology 89: 281-293.

CRONBACH, L. J. (1950) "Further evidence on response sets and test design." Educ. and Psych. Measurement 10: 3-31.

CRONBACH, L. J. (1946) "Response sets and test validity." Educ. and Psych. Measurement 6: 475-494.

HAMILTON, D. L. (1968) "Personality attributes associated with extreme response style." Psych. Bull. 69: 192-203.

LIGHT, C. S. , M. ZAX , and D. H. GARDINER (1965) "Relationship of age, sex, and intelligence level to extreme response style." J. of Personality and Social Psychology 2: 907-909.

MERRENS, M. (1970) "Generality and stability of extreme response style." Psych. Reports 27: 802-802.

O'DONOVAN, D. (1965) "Rating extremity: pathology or meaningfulness?" Psych. Rev. 72: 358-372.

10.

PEABODY, D. (1962) "Two components in bipolar scales: direction and extremeness." Psych. Rev. 69: 65-73.

11.

ROTTER, J. B. (1967) "A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust." J. of Personality 35: 651-665.

12.

SUZUKI, T. (1973) Personal communication.

13.

TRIANDIS, H. C. (1972) The Analysis of Subjective Culture. New York: John Wiley.

14.

TRIANDIS, H. C. and L. M. TRIANDIS (1962) "A cross-cultural study of social distance." Psych. Monographs 76, 21-21.

15.

TRIANDIS, H. C. , R. S. MALPASS , and A. R. DAVIDSON (1972) "Cross-cultural psychology," pp. 1-84 in B. J. Siegel (ed.) Biennial Review of Anthropology: 1971. Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford Univ. Press.

16.

WRIGHTSMAN, L. S. (1964) "Measurement of philosophies of human nature." Psych. Reports 14: 743-751.

17.

ZAX, M. and S. TAKAHASHI (1967) "Cultural influences on response style: comparisons of Japanese and American college students." J. of Social Psychology 71: 3-10.