Abstract
Positive implicit self-esteem has been argued to be a universal characteristic of the human mind. Yet, recent work using U.S. samples finds evidence suggesting that the self is implicitly bivalent. The bivalent-priming elicited by the self was markedly different from the univalent-priming elicited by personally significant, positive objects. The findings of implicit self-bivalence align with theoretical perspectives acknowledging the self’s affective complexity. The present preregistered study examines whether implicit self-bivalence characterizes only Western, individualistic cultures, or if it reflects a more general feature of the human mind that also characterizes Eastern, collectivistic cultures (e.g., China). Replicating past work, in a U.S. sample (N = 125), priming the self in an evaluative priming task (EPT) facilitated both positive and negative target categorization (bivalent-priming), whereas priming a personally significant, liked object only facilitated positive target categorization (univalent-priming). Critically, in a Chinese sample (N = 104), we translated the EPT into Chinese (and validated it through back-translation) and observed the same result pattern. We also explored potential cultural differences in the magnitude of implicit self-bivalence (i.e., implicit self-positivity and self-negativity, respectively) but did not find statistically significant cross-cultural differences. The current work provides the first evidence that implicit self-bivalence is not culturally specific to Western samples. The clear demonstration of implicit self-bivalence in an Eastern sample provides initial evidence of its cross-cultural generality. We discuss the implications for understanding the nature of self-representations, the functions of implicit self-bivalence, and directions for future work.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
