This study uses bioecological and identity theories to explore associations among maternal education and employment, fathers’ gender role beliefs and identities, and fathers’ caregiving and nurturing involvement in a Turkish context. The study sample was derived from data collected in 2016 from 1,102 fathers of children between birth and 3 years of age. We used path analysis in structural equation modeling to test direct and indirect associations. Direct paths between maternal education and employment and fathers’ caregiving and nurturing behaviors were not significant; however, some fathers’ gender role beliefs mediated the associations. Modernity beliefs mediated the association between education and caregiving, and fathers’ emotional closeness mediated the association between maternal education and fathers’ nurturing behaviors. Furthermore, maternal employment was indirectly associated with fathers’ caregiving via his beliefs about the equality of sons and daughters and division of labor at home. Father identity development was not associated with maternal education or employment, and only mediated associations between fathers’ beliefs about emotional closeness and their caregiving and nurturing involvement. The current findings suggest that cultural norms and beliefs likely play themselves out via parenting styles and family structures (the microsystems for children), and therefore these family variables may contain very valuable cultural information in understanding the processes of father identity construction, masculinity beliefs, and father involvement behaviors.
AdamsonsK.JohnsonS. K. (2013). An updated and expanded meta-analysis of nonresident fathering and child well-being. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(4), 589–599. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033786
AldousJ.MulliganG. M.BjarnasonT. (1998). Fathering over time: What makes the difference?Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 809–820. https://doi.org/10.2307/353626
5.
AratY. (2010). Religion, politics and gender equality in Turkey: Implications of a democratic paradox?Third World Quarterly, 31(6), 869–884. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2010.502712
6.
BanaszakL. A.PlutzerE. (1993). Contextual determinants of feminist attitudes: National and subnational influences in Western Europe. American Political Science Review, 87(1), 147–157.
7.
BarclayL.DonovanJ.GenoveseA. (1996). Men’s experiences during their partner’s first pregnancy: A grounded theory analysis. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 13(3), 12–24.
8.
BaruchG. K.BienerL.BarnettR. C. (1987). Women and gender in research on work and family stress. American Psychologist, 42(2), 130–136.
9.
BelskyJ.KellyJ. (1994). The transition to parenthood. Delacorte.
10.
BolzendahlC. I.MyersD. J. (2004). Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Opinion change in women and men, 1974-1998. Social Forces, 83(2), 759–789. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2005.0005
11.
BonneyJ. F.KelleyM. L.LevantR. F. (1999). A model of fathers’ behavioral involvement in child care in dual-earner families. Journal of Family Psychology, 13(3), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.13.3.401
12.
BoratavH. B.FişekG. O.ZiyaH. E. (2014). Unpacking masculinities in the context of social change: Internal complexities of the identities of married men in Turkey. Men and Masculinities, 17(3), 299–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X14539511
13.
BrandthB.KvandeE. (1998). Masculinity and child care: The reconstruction of fathering. Sociological Review, 46(2), 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954x.00120
14.
BrannonR.DavidD. S. (1976). The male sex role: Our culture’s blueprint of manhood, and what it’s done for us lately. In DavidD. S.BrannonR. (Eds.), The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role (pp. 1–48). Addison-Wesley.
15.
BronfenbrennerU.MorrisP. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In DamonW.LernerR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Volume 1: Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 993–1028). Wiley.
16.
BuistA.MorseC. A.DurkinS. (2003). Men’s adjustment to fatherhood: Implications for obstetric health care. JOGN Nursing; Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 32(2), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0884217503252127
CabreraN. J.ShannonJ. D.Tamis-LeMondaC. (2007). Fathers’ influence on their children’s cognitive and emotional development: From toddlers to Pre-K. Applied Developmental Science, 11(4), 208–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888690701762100
CassidyM. L.WarrenB. O. (1996). Family employment status and gender role attitudes: A comparison of women and men college graduates. Gender & Society, 10(3), 312–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124396010003007
22.
ChesleyN. (2011). Stay-at-home fathers and breadwinning mothers: Gender, couple dynamics, and social change. Gender & Society, 25(5), 642–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243211417433
23.
CiabattariT. (2001). Changes in men’s conservative gender ideologies: Cohort and period influences. Gender & Society, 15(4), 574–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124301015004005
24.
ColeyR. L.Lewin-BizanS.CarranoJ. (2011). Does early paternal parenting promote low-income children’s long-term cognitive skills?Journal of Family Issues, 32(11), 1522–1542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x11402175
25.
ColtraneS. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 1208–1233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01208.x
26.
CondonJ. T.BoyceP.CorkindaleC. J. (2004). The first-time fathers study: A prospective study of the mental health and wellbeing of men during the transition to parenthood. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 38, 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1614.2004.01298.x
27.
CowanC. P.CowanP. A. (1997). Becoming a parent. In SkolnickA. S.SkolnickJ. H. (Eds.), Family in transition (pp. 201–213). Longman.
28.
CraigL.MullanK. (2010). Parenthood, gender and work-family time in the United States, Australia, Italy, France, and Denmark. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(5), 1344–1361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00769.x
DohertyW. J.KouneskiE. F.EricksonM. F. (1998). Responsible fathering: An overview and conceptual framework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/353848
31.
FanP. L.MariniM. M. (2000). Influences on gender-role attitudes during the transition to adulthood. Social Science Research, 29(2), 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1006/ssre.1999.0669
32.
GerstelN.GallagherS. K. (2001). Men’s caregiving: Gender and the contingent character of care. Gender & Society, 15(2), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124301015002003
33.
GlauberR.GozjolkoK. L. (2011). Do traditional fathers always work more? Gender ideology, race, and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(5), 1133–1148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00870.x
34.
Gutierrez-DomenechM. (2010). Parental employment and time with children in Spain. Review of Economics of the Household, 8(3), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-010-9096-z
35.
HawkinsA.BradfordK.PalkovitzR.ChristiansenS.DayR.CallV. (2002). The inventory of father involvement: A pilot study of a new measure of father involvement. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 10(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.1002.183
36.
HawkinsA.PalkovitzR. (1999). Beyond ticks and clicks: The need for more diverse and broader conceptualizations and measures of father involvement. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 8, 11–32. https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.0801.11
37.
HenleyK.PasleyK. (2005). Conditions affecting the association between father identity and father involvement. Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research & Practice about Men as Fathers, 3(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.3149/fth.0301.59
38.
HofferthS. L.GoldscheiderF. (2010). Family structure and the transition to early parenthood. Demography, 47(2), 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X11425779
39.
HookJ. L.WolfeC. M. (2012). New fathers? Residential fathers’ time with children in four countries. Journal of Family Issues, 33(4), 415–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X11425779
40.
Ihinger-TallmanM.PasleyK.BuehlerC. (1993). Developing a middle-range theory of father involvement postdivorce. Journal of Family Issues, 14(4), 550–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251393014004005
KaufmanG.UhlenbergP. (2000). The influence of parenthood on the work effort of married men and women. Social Forces, 78(3), 931–947. https://doi.org/10.2307/3005936
44.
KitterødR. H.PettersenS. V. (2006). Making up for mothers’ employed working hours? Housework and childcare among Norwegian fathers. Work Employment & Society, 20(3), 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017006066997
45.
KusculG. H.AdamsonsK. (2022). A personal and relational model of father identity construction. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 14, 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12451
46.
LambM. E. (1987). Predictive implications of individual differences in attachment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(6), 817–824.
47.
LambM. E. (1997). The development of father–infant relationships. In LambM. E. (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (pp. 104–120). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
48.
LambM. E.LewisC. (2010). The development and significance of father-child relationships in two-parent families. In LambM. E. (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (pp. 94–153). Wiley.
49.
LevantR. F. (1996). The new psychology of men. Professional Psychology Research and Practice, 27(3), 259–265.
50.
LevantR. F.HirschL. S.CelentanoE.CozzaT. M. (1992). The male role: An investigation of contemporary norms. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 14, 325–337.
51.
LevantR. F.McDermottR.ParentM. C.AlshabaniN.MahalikJ. R.HammerJ. H. (2020). Development and evaluation of a new short form of the conformity to masculine norms inventory (CMNI-30). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 67(5), 622–636. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000414
52.
LiaoT. F.CaiY. (1995). Socialization, life situations, and gender-role attitudes regarding the family among white American women. Sociological Perspectives, 38(2), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.2307/1389292
53.
MahalikJ. R.CournoyerR. J. (2000). Identifying gender role conflict messages that distinguish mildly depressed from nondepressed men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 1(2), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.1.2.109
54.
MahalikJ. R.LockeB. D.LudlowL. H.DiemerM. A.ScottR. P. J.GottfriedM.FreitasG. (2003). Development of the conformity to masculine norms inventory. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 4(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.4.1.3
55.
MarsiglioW.AmatoP.DayR. D.LambM. E. (2000). Scholarship on fatherhood in the 1990s and beyond. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 1173–1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01173.x
56.
MattheyS.BarnettB.UngererJ.WatersB. (2000). Paternal and maternal depressed mood during the transition to parenthood. Journal of Affective Disorders, 60, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(99)00159-7
57.
McGillB. S. (2014). Navigating new forms of involved fatherhood: Employment, fathering needs and father involvement. Journal of Family Issues, 35, 1089–1106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x14522247
58.
MetindoganA. (2015). Fathering in Turkey. In RoopnarineJ. (Ed.), Fathers across cultures: The importance, roles, and diverse practices of dads; the importance, roles and diverse practices of dads (pp. 327–349). ABC-CLIO LLC.
59.
O’NeilJ. M. (2015). Men’s gender role conflict: Psychological costs, consequences, and an agenda for change. American Psychological Association.
PalkovitzR. (1997). Reconstructing “involvement”: Expanding conceptualizations of men’s caring in contemporary families. In HawkinsA. J.DollahiteD. C. (Eds.), Generative fathering: Beyond deficit perspectives (pp. 200–216). Sage.
62.
PasleyK.MintonC. (1997). Generative fathering after divorce and remarriage: Beyond the “disappearing dad. In HawkinsA. J.DollahiteD. C. (Eds.), Generative fathering: Beyond deficit perspectives (pp. 118–133). SAGE.
63.
PettsR. J.ShaferK. M.EssigL. (2018). Does adherence to masculine norms shape fathering behavior?Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(3), 704–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12476
64.
PleckJ. H. (2010). Paternal involvement; revised conceptualization and theoretical linkages with child outcomes. In LambM. E. (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (5th ed., pp. 58–93). Wiley.
65.
RaleyS.BianchiS. M.WangW. (2012). When do fathers care? Mothers’ economic contribution and fathers’ involvement in child care. American Journal of Sociology, 117(5), 1422–1459. https://doi.org/10.1086/663354
66.
RhodebeckL. A. (1996). The structure of men's and women's feminist orientations: Feminist identity and feminist opinion. Gender & Society, 10(4), 386–403.
67.
RoetersA.van der LippeT.KluwerE. S. (2009). Parental work demands and the frequency of child-related routine and interactive activities. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(5), 1193–1204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00663.x
SayerL. C.GauthierA. H.FurstenbergF. F. (2004). Educational differences in parents’ time with children: Cross-national variations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(5), 1152–1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00084.x
70.
Schoppe-SullivanS.McBrideB.HoM.-H. (2004). Unidimensional versus Multidimensional Perspectives on Father Involvement. Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice about Men as Fathers, 2(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.3149/fth.0202.147
71.
ShwalbD. W.ShwalbB. J.LambM. E. (Eds.). (2013). Fathers in cultural context. Routledge.
72.
StrykerS. (1968). Identity salience and role performance: The relevance of symbolic interaction theory for family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 30, 558–564.
73.
StrykerS. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Company.
74.
StrykerS. (1987). Identity theory: Developments and extensions. John Wiley & Sons.
75.
StykesJ. B. (2015). What matters most? Money, relationships, and visions of masculinity as key correlates of father involvement. Fathering, 13(1), 6.
76.
SunarD. (2002). Change and continuity in the Turkish middle class family. In ÖzdalgaE.LiljestromR. (Eds.), Autonomy and dependence in family: Turkey and Sweden in critical perspective (pp. 217–238). Swedish Research Institute.
77.
SunarD.FisekG. (2005). Contemporary Turkish families. In GielenU.RoopnarineJ. (Eds.), Families in global perspective (pp. 169–183). Allyn & Bacon/Pearson.
YagmurluB.SansonA. (2009). Parenting and temperament as predictors of prosocial behaviour in Australian and Turkish Australian children. Australian Journal of Psychology, 61(2), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530802001338
