We investigated lay conceptions of modesty in China (谦虚) using a prototype approach. First, a sample of Chinese participants spontaneously listed the characteristics of modest persons. Independent coders then edited these into 112 exemplars, and further grouped them into 34 categories (Study 1). Categories that subsumed more frequently occurring items were deemed more prototypical. Second, another sample of Chinese participants directly rated these categories for how well they corresponded with the concept of modesty (Study 2). Thereafter, frequencies and ratings were algorithmically integrated, permitting categories to be ranked into three broad divisions: central, peripheral, and marginal. Finally, the ordinal validity of divisions was confirmed by having a third sample of Chinese participants rate the modesty of individuals exhibiting traits from within each division (Study 3). Lay conceptions of modesty in China only partly corresponded to those in previous Western samples. Among those categories that were shared, some were central in both China and the West (FRIENDLY, NOT CONCEITED), others only in China (LOW-KEY, POLITE, EASYGOING, AUTHENTIC). Furthermore, several central categories were unique to China (TAKES-CRITICISM, STEADY, CAUTIOUS, ASPIRING). Our findings inform ongoing conceptualizations of modesty in a cross-cultural context.
AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 751–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751
AshtonM. C.LeeK. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907
4.
AshtonM. C.LeeK.PeruginiM.SzarotaP.de VriesR. E.Di BlasL.BoiesK.De RaadB. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.356
5.
BondM. H.LeungK.WanK. C. (1982). The social impact of self-effacing attributions: The Chinese case. The Journal of Social Psychology, 118(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1982.9922794
6.
CaiH.BrownJ. D.DengC.OakesM. (2007). Self-esteem and culture: Differences in cognitive self-evaluations or affective self-regard?Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10(2), 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2007.00222.x
7.
CaiH.HuangZ.JingY. (2019). Living in a changing world: The change of culture and psychology. In MatsumotoD.HwangH. C. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (2nd ed., pp. 1070–1116). Oxford University Press.
8.
CaiH.KwanV. S.-Y.SedikidesC. (2012). A sociocultural approach to narcissism: The case of modern China. European Journal of Personality, 26(5), 529–535. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.852
9.
CaiH. J.SedikidesC.GaertnerL.WangC.CarvalloM.XuY.O’MaraE. M.JacksonL. E. (2011). Tactical self-enhancement in China: Is modesty at the service of self-enhancement in East-Asian culture?Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(1), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610376599
10.
CaiH. J.ZouX.FengY.LiuY. Z.JingY. M. (2018). Increasing need for uniqueness in contemporary China: Empirical evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 554. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00554
11.
ChenS. X.BondM. H.ChanB.TangD.BuchtelE. E. (2009). Behavioral manifestations of modesty. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(4), 603–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022108330992
12.
ChenS. X.LamB. C. P.BuchtelE. E.BondM. H. (2014). The conscientiousness paradox: Cultural mindset shapes competence perception. European Journal of Personality, 28(5), 425–436. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1923
13.
ChiuC.-Y.WanC.ChengS. Y.-Y.KimY.-H.YangY.-Y. (2011). Cultural perspectives on self-enhancement and self-protection. In AlickeM. D.SedikidesC. (Eds.), Handbook of selfenhancement and self-protection (pp. 425–451). Guilford Press.
14.
CialdiniR. B.WosinskaW.DabulA. J.Whetstone-DionR.HeszenI. (1998). When social role salience leads to social role rejection: Modest self-presentation among women and men in two cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(5), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298245003
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R.DyeD. A. (1991). Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(9), 887–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(91)90177-D
17.
FehrB. (1988). Prototype analysis of the concepts of love and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(4), 557–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.4.557
18.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
19.
FitnessJ.FletcherG. J. O. (1993). Love, hate, anger, and jealousy in close relationships: A prototype and cognitive appraisal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 942–958. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.942
20.
GreggA. P.HartC. M.SedikidesC.KumashiroM. (2008). Lay conceptions of modesty: A prototype analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(7), 978–992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208316734
21.
HanK.-S. (2011). The self-enhancing function of Chinese modesty: From a perspective of social script. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 14(4), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2011.01354.x
22.
HassebrauckM. (1997). Cognitions of relationship quality: A prototype analysis of their structure and consequences. Personal Relationships, 4, 163–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1997.tb00137.x
23.
HeadlandT. N.PikeK. L.HarrisM. E. (1990). Emics and etics: The insider/outsider debate. Sage.
24.
HelfrichH. (1999). Beyond the dilemma of cross-cultural psychology: Resolving the tension between etic and emic Approaches. Culture and Psychology, 5(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9952002
25.
HepperE. G.RitchieT. D.SedikidesC.WildschutT. (2012). Odyssey’s end: Lay conceptions of nostalgia reflect its original Homeric meaning. Emotion, 12(1), 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025167
26.
HolbrookA. L.BerentM. K.KrosnickJ. A.VisserP. S.BoningerD. S. (2005) Attitude importance and the accumulation of attitude-relevant knowledge in memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 749–769. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.749
27.
HoorensV.PandelaereM.OldersmaF.SedikidesC. (2012). The hubris hypothesis: You can self-enhance, but you’d better not show it. Journal of Personality, 80(5), 1237–1274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00759
28.
HowardM. C.Van ZandtE. C. (2020). The discriminant validity of honesty-humility: A meta-analysis of the HEXACO, Big Five, and dark triad. Journal of Research in Personality, 87, 103982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103982
29.
HuX.ChenS. X.ZhangL.YuF.LiuL. (2018). Do Chinese traditional and modern cultures affect young adults’ moral priorities?Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1799. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01799
30.
HuangL. L. (2016). Interpersonal harmony and conflict for Chinese people: A Yin-Yang Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 847. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00847
31.
JohnO. P.AngleitnerA.OstendorfF. (1988). The lexical approach to personality: A historical review of trait taxonomic research. European Journal of Personality, 2(3), 171–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410020302
32.
KelleyT. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. World Book Co.
33.
KimM.HanH. R.PhillipsL. (2003). Metric equivalence assessment in cross-cultural research: Using an example of the Center for Epidemiological Studies–Depression Scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 11(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1891/jnum.11.1.5.52061
34.
KrosnickJ. A. (1989). Attitude importance and attitude accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15(3), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167289153002
35.
KrosnickJ. A.BoningerD. S.ChuangY. C.BerentM. K.CarnotC. G. (1993). Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(6), 1132–1151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1132
36.
KurmanJ.SriramN. (2002). Interrelations among vertical and horizontal collectivism, modesty, and self-enhancement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033001005
37.
LambertN. M.GrahamS. M.FinchamF. D. (2009). A prototype analysis of gratitude: Varieties of gratitude experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(9), 1193–1207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209338071
38.
LarsenK. RBongC. (2016). A tool for addressing construct identity in literature reviews and meta-analyses. MIS Quarterly, 40(3), 529–551. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.3.01
39.
MalleB. F. (2006). The actor-observer asymmetry in attribution: A (surprising) meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), 895–919. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.895
40.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610375557
41.
McCraeR. R.TerraccianoA., & Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2005). Personality profiles of cultures: Aggregate personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.407
42.
MilfontT. L.FischerR. (2015). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.857
43.
MillerC.FurrR. M.KnobelA.FleesonW. (Eds.). (2015). Character: New directions from philosophy, psychology, and theology. Oxford University Press.
44.
MorganB.GullifordL.KristjánssonK. (2014). Gratitude in the UK: A new prototype analysis and a cross-cultural comparison. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(4), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.898321
ReganP. C.KocanE. R.WhitlockT. (1998). Ain’t love grand! A prototype analysis of the concept of romantic love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(3), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407598153006
47.
RobertsB. W.JacksonJ. J.FayardJ. V.EdmondsG.MeintsJ. (2009). Conscientiousness. In LearyM. R.HoyleR. H. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 369–381). Guilford Press.
48.
RoschE. (1978). Principles of categorization. In RoschE.LloydB. B. (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Erlbaum.
49.
RudowiczE.YueX.-D. (2000). Concepts of creativity: Similarities and differences among mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwanese Chinese. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 34(3), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2000.tb01210.x
50.
SchmittD. P.AllikJ.McCraeR. R.Benet-MartínezV. (2007). The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 173–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022106297299
51.
SedikidesC.CampbellW. K. (2017). Narcissistic force meets systemic resistance: The Energy Clash Model. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(3), 400–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617692105
52.
SedikidesC.GaertnerL.CaiH. (2015a). On the panculturality of self-enhancement and self-protection motivation: The case for the universality of self-esteem. Advances in Motivation Science, 2, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2015.04.002
53.
SedikidesC.GreggA. P.HartC. M. (2007). The importance of being modest. In SedikidesC.SpencerS. (Eds.), The self: Frontiers in social psychology (pp. 163–184). Psychology Press.
54.
SedikidesC.HoorensV.DufnerM. (2015b). Self-enhancing self-presentation: Interpersonal, relational, and organizational implications. In GuayF.McInerneyD. M.CravenR.MarshH. W. (Eds.), Self-concept, motivation and identity: Underpinning success with research and practice. International Advances in Self Research (Vol. 5, pp. 29–55). Information Age Publishing.
55.
SeuntjensT. G.ZeelenbergM.BreugelmansS. M.VenN. (2015). Defining greed. British Journal of Psychology, 106(3), 505–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12100
56.
ShaverP.SchwartzJ.KirsonD.O’ConnorC. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1061–1086. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1061
57.
Spencer-OateyH.NgP. (2000). Reconsidering Chinese modesty: Hong Kong and mainland Chinese evaluative judgments of compliment responses. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 11(2), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.11.2.05spe
58.
SternbergR. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.607
59.
StrackF.DeutschR. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 220–247. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1
60.
TingR. S. K.ZhangK. J.HuangQ. B. (2019). Indigenous psychology for all Chinese: Heeding the mind and spirit of ethnic minorities in China. In YehK.-H. (Ed.), Asian indigenous psychologies in global context (pp 249–276). Palgrave Studies in Indigenous Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96232-0_11
61.
Van DammeC.HoorensV.SedikidesC. (2016). Why self-enhancement provokes dislike: The hubris hypothesis and the aversiveness of explicit self-superiority claimsSelf and Identity, 159(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2015.10952325
62.
van der LindenD.DunkelC. S.PetridesK. V. (2016). The General Factor of Personality (GFP) as social effectiveness: Review of the literature. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.020.
63.
van de VijverF.TanzerN. K. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. Review of Applied Psychology, 54(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2003.12.004
64.
XiongM.WangF.CaiR. (2018). Development and validation of the Chinese Modesty Scale (CMS). Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2014. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02014
YangK.-S. (1996). The psychological transformation of the Chinese people as a result of societal modernization. In BondM. H. (Ed.), The Handbook of Chinese Psychology (pp. 479–498). Oxford University Press.
67.
YuF.PengT.PengK.TangS.ChenC. S.QianX.Pei SunQ.HanT.ChaiF. (2015). Cultural value shifting in pronoun use. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(2), 310–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115619230
68.
ZengR.GreenfieldP. M. (2015). Cultural evolution over the last 40 years in China: Using the Google Ngram Viewer to study implications of social and political change for cultural values. International Journal of Psychology, 50(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12125
69.
ZhangR.NoelsK. A.GuanY.WengL. (2017). Making sense of positive self-evaluations in China: The role of sociocultural change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2214
70.
ZhengC.WuY. (2020). The more modest you are, the happier you are: The mediating roles of emotional intelligence and self-esteem. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 21(5), 1603–1615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00144-4
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
