Research on culture and cognition suggests that East Asians are relatively holistic and North Americans are relatively analytic. Social orientation and philosophical traditions have been linked to those differences; collectivism and Confucian tradition are associated with holistic thinking whereas individualism and Western philosophy are associated with analytic thinking. We tested whether Brazilians, who are Western such as North Americans and collectivistic such as East Asians, would more closely resemble U.S. Americans or Chinese participants in various measures of cognitive style. Across five studies, Brazilians were always more holistic than Americans and sometimes more holistic than Chinese participants. Brazilians differed from Chinese participants in that they were particularly optimistic in their judgments about the future (Study 3) and reported varying their emotion expressivity more by context (Study 5). Results build on previous East/West comparisons by identifying a non-Confucian, Western group that may be as holistic as East Asians.
BuenoE. (2003). Brasil: Uma história [Brazil: A history]. São Paulo, Brazil: Ática.
2.
ChoiI.DalalR.Kim-PrietoC.ParkH. (2003). Culture and judgment of causal relevance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 46-59. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.46
3.
ChoiI.KooM.ChoiJ. A. (2007). Individual differences in analytic versus holistic thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 691-705. doi:10.1177/0146167206298568
4.
CohenA. B. (2009). Many forms of culture. American Psychologist, 64, 194-204. doi:10.1037/a0015308
5.
CostaJ. C. (1964). A history of ideas in Brazil: The development of philosophy in Brazil and the evolution of national history. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
DaMattaR. A. (1995). For an anthropology of the Brazilian tradition, or “A virtude está no meio.” In HessD. J.DaMattaR. A. (Eds.), The Brazilian puzzle: Culture on the borderlands of the Western world (pp. 270-292). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
7.
de HolandaS. B. (2004). Raízes do Brasil [Roots of Brazil] (26th ed.). São Paulo, Brazil: Editora Schwarcz Ltda. (Original work published 1936)
8.
DuarteF. (2011). The strategic role of charm, simpatia and jeitinho in Brazilian society: A qualitative study. Asian Journal of Latin American Studies, 24, 29-48. Retrieved from http://www.ajlas.org/v2006/paper/2011vol24no302.pdf
9.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
10.
FestingerL.CarlsmithJ. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203-210.
11.
FreyreG. (2003). Casa-grande & senzala: Formação da família brasileira sob o regime da economia patriarcal [The masters and the slaves] (48th ed.). São Paulo, Brazil: Global Editora e Distribuidora Ltda. (Original work published 1933)
12.
GoodmanJ. K.CryderC. E.CheemaA. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 213-224. doi:10.1002/bdm.1753
13.
HamamuraT.MeijerZ.HeineS. J.KamayaK.HoriI. (2009). Approach—Avoidance motivation and information processing: A cross-cultural analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 454-462. doi:10.1177/0146167208329512
14.
HayesA. F.KrippendorffK. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77-89.
15.
HedgesL. V.OlkinI. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
16.
HeineS. J.LehmanD. R. (1997). Culture, dissonance, and self-affirmation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(4), 389-400. doi:10.1177/0146167297234005
17.
HeineS. J.LehmanD. R.PengK.GreenholtzJ. (2002). What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales? The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 903-918. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.903
18.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.LevinD. T.BanajiM. R. (2011). Evidence for hypodescent and racial hierarchy in the categorization and perception of biracial individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 492-506. doi:10.1037/a0021562
19.
HofstedeG.HofstedeG. J.MinkovM. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). London, England: McGraw-Hill.
20.
HollowayR. A.WaldripA. M.IckesW. (2009). Evidence that a simpático self-schema accounts for differences in the self-concepts and social behavior of Latinos versus Whites (and Blacks). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1012-1028. doi:10.1037/a0013883
21.
InglehartR.CarballoM. (1997). Does Latin America exist? (And is there a Confucian culture?): A global analysis of cross-cultural differences. Political Science & Politics, 30, 34-47. doi:10.1017/S104909650004261X
JiL.-J.ZhangZ.NisbettR. E. (2004). Is it culture or is it language? Examination of language effects in cross-cultural research on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 57-65. doi:S10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.57
25.
KanagawaC.CrossS. E.MarkusH. R. (2001). “Who Am I?” The cultural psychology of the conceptual self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 90-103. doi:10.1177/0146167201271008
26.
KitayamaS.ParkH.SevincerA. T.KarasawaM.UskulA. K. (2009). A cultural task analysis of implicit independence: Comparing North America, Western Europe, and East Asia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 236-255. doi:10.1037/a0015999
27.
KitayamaS.VarnumM. E. W.SevincerA. T. (2014). The frontier: Voluntary settlement and cultural change. In CohenA. B. (Ed.), Culture reexamined: Broadening our understanding of social and evolutionary influences (pp. 93-127). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
28.
KleinmanA. (1986). Social origins of distress and disease: Depression, neurasthenia, and pain in modern China. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29.
LechugaJ.SantosB. M.Garza-CaballeroA. A.VillarrealR. (2011). Holistic reasoning on the other side of the world: Validation of the analysis-holism scale in Mexicans. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 17, 325-330. doi:10.1037/a0023881
30.
LechugaJ.WiebeJ. S. (2011). Culture and probability judgment accuracy: The influence of holistic reasoning. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 1054-1065. doi:10.1177/0022022111407914
31.
LeungK.BondM. H. (1984). The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 793-804. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.47.4.793
32.
LivermoreH. V. (1953). Portuguese history. In LivermoreH. V. (Ed.), Portugal and Brazil: An introduction (pp. 48-81). London, England: Oxford University Press.
33.
MasudaT.EllsworthP.MesquitaB.LeuJ.TanidaS.Van de VeerdonkE. (2008). Placing the face in context: Cultural differences in the perception of facial emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 365-381. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.365
34.
MasudaT.GonzalezR.KwanL.NisbettR. E. (2008). Culture and aesthetic preference: Comparing the attention to context of East Asians and Americans. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1260-1275. doi:10.1177/0146167208320555
35.
MasudaT.NisbettR. E. (2001). Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 922-934. doi:10.1037//0022-35I4.81.5.922
36.
MorlingB.LamoreauxM. (2008). Measuring culture outside the head: A meta-analysis of individualism-collectivism in cultural products. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 199-221. doi:10.1177/1088868308318260
37.
MorrisM. W.PengK. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949-971. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.949
38.
MurataA.MoserJ.KitayamaS. (2013). Culture shapes electrocortical responses during emotion suppression. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8, 595-601. doi:10.1093/scan/nss036
39.
NaJ.GrossmannI.VarnumM. E. W.KitayamaS.GonzalezR.NisbettR. E. (2010). Cultural differences are not always reducible to individual differences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 6192-6197. doi:10.1073/pnas.1001911107
40.
NisbettR. E.PengK.ChoiI.NorenzayanA. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291-310. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291
41.
NisbettR. E.WilsonT. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
42.
Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2017). Educational attainment and labour-force status [Data file]. Available from http://stats.oecd.org
43.
OslandJ. S.De FrancoS.OslandA. (1999). Organizational implications of Latin American culture: Lessons for the expatriate manager. Journal of Management Inquiry, 8, 219-234. doi:10.1177/105649269982018
44.
OysermanD.CoonH. M.KemmelmeierM. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.128.1.3
45.
OysermanD.LeeS. W. S. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 311-342. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.311
46.
PaolacciG.ChandlerJ.IpeirotisP. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411-419. Retrieved from http://journal.sjdm.org/10/10630a/jdm10630a.html
47.
PearsonV.StephanW. G. (1998). Preferences for styles of negotiation: A comparison of Brazil and the U.S. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, 67-83. doi:10.1016/S0147-1767(97)00036-9
48.
PengK.NisbettR. E. (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54, 741-754. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.9.741
49.
RezendeC. B. (2008). Stereotypes and national identity: Experiencing the “Emotional Brazilian.”Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 15, 103-122. doi:10.1080/10702890701801866
50.
RubyM. B.FalkC. F.HeineS. J.VillaC.SilbersteinO. (2012). Not all collectivisms are equal: Opposing preferences for ideal affect between East Asians and Mexicans. Emotion, 12, 1206-1209. doi:10.1037/a0029118
51.
Sanchez-BurksJ.NisbettR. E.YbarraO. (2000). Cultural styles, relational schemas, and prejudice against out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 174-189. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.2.174
52.
SchreierS. S.HeinrichsN.AldenL.RapeeR. M.HofmannS. G.ChenJ.. . .BögelsS. (2010). Social anxiety and social norms in individualistic and collectivistic countries. Depression and Anxiety, 27, 1128-1134. doi:10.1002/da.20746
53.
ShkodrianiG. M.GibbonsJ. L. (1995). Individualism and collectivism among university students in Mexico and the United States. The Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 765-772. doi:10.1080/00224545.1995.9713979
54.
SnibbeA. C.MarkusH. R. (2005). You can’t always get what you want: Educational attainment, agency, and choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 703-720. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.703
55.
SotoJ. A.LevensonR. W.EblingR. (2005). Cultures of moderation and expression: Emotional experience, behavior, and physiology in Chinese Americans and Mexican Americans. Emotion, 5, 154-165. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.2.154
56.
SotoJ. A.PerezC. R.KimY.LeeE. A.MinnickM. R. (2011). Is expressive suppression always associated with poorer psychological functioning? A cross-cultural comparison between European Americans and Hong Kong Chinese. Emotion, 11, 1450-1455. doi:10.1037/a0023340
57.
Spencer-RodgersJ.WilliamsM. J.PengK. (2010). Cultural differences in expectations of change and tolerance for contradiction: A decade of empirical research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 296-312. doi:10.1177/1088868310362982
58.
StephensT. B. (1992). Order and discipline in China: The Shanghai Mixed Court 1911-27. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
59.
TalhelmT.ZhangX.OishiS.ShiminC.DuanD.LanX.KitayamaS. (2014). Large-scale psychological differences within China explained by rice versus wheat agriculture. Science, 344, 603-609. doi:10.1126/science.1246850
60.
TriandisH. C. (2001). Individualism-collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69, 907-924.
61.
TsaiJ. L.LouieJ. Y.ChenE. E.UchidaY. (2007). Learning what feelings to desire: Socialization of ideal affect through children’s storybooks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 17-30. doi:10.1177/0146167206292749
62.
United Nations Development Programme. (2015). Human development index and its components [Data file]. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/en/data
UskulA. K.KitayamaS.NisbettR. E. (2008). Ecocultural basis of cognition: Farmers and fishermen are more holistic than herders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 8552-8556. doi:10.1073/pnas.0803874105
66.
Van der SchalkJ.HawkS.FischerA.DoosjeB. (2011). Moving faces, looking places: Validation of the Amsterdam Dynamic Facial Expression Set (ADFES). Emotion, 11, 907-920. doi:10.1037/a0023853
67.
VarnumM. E. W.GrossmannI.KatunarD.NisbettR. E.KitayamaS. (2008). Holism in a European cultural context: Differences in cognitive style between Central and East Europeans and Westerners. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 8, 321-333. doi:10.1163/156853708X358209
68.
VarnumM. E. W.GrossmannI.KitayamaS.NisbettR. E. (2010). The origin of cultural differences in cognition: The social orientation hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 9-13. doi:10.1177/0963721409359301
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
